To evaluate the cardiovascular risk of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), we investigated lipid profile, metabolic pattern, and echocardiography in 30 young women with PCOS and 30 healthy age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched women. PCOS women had higher fasting glucose and insulin levels, homeostasis model assessment score of insulin sensitivity, total cholesterol (TC) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, and TC/high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio and lower HDL-C levels than controls. Additionally, PCOS women had higher left atrium size (32.0 ± 4.9 vs. 27.4 ± 2.1 mm; P < 0.0001) and left ventricular mass index (80.5 ± 18.1 vs. 56.1 ± 5.4 g/m2; P < 0.0001) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (64.4 ± 4.1 vs. 67.1 ± 2.6%; P = 0.003) and early to late mitral flow velocity ratio (1.6 ± 0.4 vs. 2.1 ± 0.2; P < 0.0001) than controls. When patients and controls were grouped according to BMI [normal weight (BMI, >18 and <25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI, 25.1–30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI, >30 kg/m2)], the differences between PCOS women and controls were maintained in overweight and obese women. In normal weight PCOS women, a significant increase in left ventricular mass index and a decrease in diastolic filling were observed, notwithstanding no change in TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TC/HDL-C ratio, and TG compared with controls. In conclusion, our data show the detrimental effect of PCOS on the cardiovascular system even in young women asymptomatic for cardiac disease.

THE POLYCYSTIC OVARY syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrine diseases in women, affecting up to 10% of women in reproductive age (1, 2). PCOS is characterized by chronic anovulatory cycles, oligo- or amenorrhea, hirsutism, and insulin resistance; obesity is also common (35). PCOS not only has a negative effect on fertility, but it is also considered a clear-cut plurimetabolic syndrome (2, 4, 6), being associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia (79). Insulin resistance is probably the major risk factor for the occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) in PCOS (3).

The risk of coronary artery disease (1012) and myocardial infarction (13) has been reported to be increased in patients with PCOS compared with regularly cycling women even if mortality because of circulatory disease does not seem to be increased (1416). In PCOS women, endothelial and diastolic dysfunction have been shown and associated with both elevated androgen levels and insulin resistance (17, 18). Recently, together with classical CV risk factors, such as total (TC) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, obesity, homocysteine, and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) (19) have been shown to be independently associated with an increased CV risk. LVH is an important predictor of CV morbidity and mortality (20, 21), but determinants of LV mass (LVM) in nonhypertensive subjects are still incompletely understood (2224).

The present study aims at further investigating the CV risk of young women with PCOS. We 1) studied the prevalence of LVH and altered diastolic filling and systolic performance by echocardiography, and 2) analyzed any potential relationship between cardiac and metabolic parameters, such as insulin secretion and lipid profile, in a selected cohort of 30 young women with PCOS.

Subjects and Methods

Subjects

Thirty young (<35 yr) women with PCOS and 30 age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls were enrolled in this pilot study. The controls were defined as age- and BMI-matched with cases when the number of years ± age of cases and the BMI (kilograms per meter squared) of cases were less than to 2 yr and less than to 1 kg/m2, respectively.

PCOS was defined according to clinical [Ferriman-Gallwey score, >8) (25) oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea > 6 months; biological LH/FSH ratio, >2; hyperandrogenism] and ultrasonographic (26, 27) findings. In Table 1 are shown the clinical and biochemical diagnostic features of the PCOS women.

TABLE 1.

Clinical and biochemical diagnostic features of the 30 PCOS studied women

FeaturesNo. (%)
Anovulatory infertility30 (100)
Normal FSH levels30 (100)
Oligo/amenorrheaa30 (100)
Clinical hyperandrogenisma26 (86.7)
Hirsutismb26 (86.7)
Acne9 (30)
Biochemical hyperandrogenisma15 (50)
    T > 2 nmol/liter12 (40)
    A > 15 nmol/liter11 (36.7)
    DHEA-S > 10 μmol/liter12 (40)
LH/FSH ratio >227 (90)
Polycystic ovary at TV-USG24 (80)
FeaturesNo. (%)
Anovulatory infertility30 (100)
Normal FSH levels30 (100)
Oligo/amenorrheaa30 (100)
Clinical hyperandrogenisma26 (86.7)
Hirsutismb26 (86.7)
Acne9 (30)
Biochemical hyperandrogenisma15 (50)
    T > 2 nmol/liter12 (40)
    A > 15 nmol/liter11 (36.7)
    DHEA-S > 10 μmol/liter12 (40)
LH/FSH ratio >227 (90)
Polycystic ovary at TV-USG24 (80)

T, Testosterone; A, androstenedione; DHEA-S, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; TV-USG, transvaginal ultrasonography.

a

NIH PCOS criteria.

b

As evaluated by Ferriman-Gallwey score.

TABLE 1.

Clinical and biochemical diagnostic features of the 30 PCOS studied women

FeaturesNo. (%)
Anovulatory infertility30 (100)
Normal FSH levels30 (100)
Oligo/amenorrheaa30 (100)
Clinical hyperandrogenisma26 (86.7)
Hirsutismb26 (86.7)
Acne9 (30)
Biochemical hyperandrogenisma15 (50)
    T > 2 nmol/liter12 (40)
    A > 15 nmol/liter11 (36.7)
    DHEA-S > 10 μmol/liter12 (40)
LH/FSH ratio >227 (90)
Polycystic ovary at TV-USG24 (80)
FeaturesNo. (%)
Anovulatory infertility30 (100)
Normal FSH levels30 (100)
Oligo/amenorrheaa30 (100)
Clinical hyperandrogenisma26 (86.7)
Hirsutismb26 (86.7)
Acne9 (30)
Biochemical hyperandrogenisma15 (50)
    T > 2 nmol/liter12 (40)
    A > 15 nmol/liter11 (36.7)
    DHEA-S > 10 μmol/liter12 (40)
LH/FSH ratio >227 (90)
Polycystic ovary at TV-USG24 (80)

T, Testosterone; A, androstenedione; DHEA-S, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; TV-USG, transvaginal ultrasonography.

a

NIH PCOS criteria.

b

As evaluated by Ferriman-Gallwey score.

The control group consisted of 30 healthy volunteer females with regular menstrual cycles. Their healthy state was determined by medical history, physical and pelvic examination, and complete blood chemistry. The normal menstrual cycle was diagnosed after a 3-month prestudy period. During this period, all healthy women recorded in a daily diary the characteristics of their menses. A normal menstrual cycle was defined as cyclic uterine bleedings with a duration of 4–5 d and a frequency of 26–32 d/month. The quantity of blood flow was defined as normal subjectively by each woman and objectively using a serum hemoglobin assay. At the entry, the normal ovulatory state was confirmed by transvaginal ultrasonography and plasma progesterone levels during the luteal phase of the cycle.

Exclusion criteria for all subjects included age less than 18 or more than 30 yr, pregnancy, hypothyroidism, hyperprolactinemia, Cushing’s syndrome, nonclassical congenital adrenal hyperplasia, and current or previous (within the last 6 months) use of oral contraceptives, glucocorticoids, antiandrogens, ovulation induction agents, antidiabetic and antiobesity drugs, or other hormonal drugs. The presence of hyperprolactinemia was excluded with a single assay of plasma prolactin (PRL) levels (normal, <25 ng/ml) (28). In women with a serum PRL levels greater than 25 ng/ml, hyperprolactinemia was excluded considering the average value of serum PRL assayed at 0800 h for three times every 15 min. Nonclassical congenital adrenal hyperplasia was excluded with a single measure of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone levels (normal, <6.0 nmol/liter) (29).

Women with clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism alone were excluded from the control group. None of the patients was affected by any neoplastic or cardiovascular disorder, and none of the women (PCOS and controls) had hypertension or used any drug during the 3 months preceding the study. None of the women had a BMI less than 18 kg/m2.

The study was performed according to the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration on human experimentation and was approved by the local ethics committee of University Federico II of Naples. All patients gave their written informed consent before the study.

Study protocol

According to a previous study protocol (30) all patients and controls were submitted to a three-step study.

Clinical study.

Height, weight, BMI, waist to hip ratio, and measurements of heart rate, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure were evaluated by standard methods. BMI was measured as the ratio between the weight and the square of the height. A BMI between 25 and 30 kg/m2 was considered an index of overweight whereas a BMI greater than 30 kg/m2 was considered an index of obesity (31). The waist to hip ratio was measured as the ratio between the waist, considered to be the smallest circumference of torso between the 12th rib and the iliac crest, and the circumference of the hip, considered as the maximal extension of the buttocks. All measurements were performed when the patients were in a standing position with relaxed abdomen, arms at their sides, and joined feet (32). Blood pressure was measured in the right arm, with the subjects in a relaxed sitting position. The average of six measurements (three taken by each of two examiners) with a mercury sphygmomanometer was used.

Biochemical study.

Fasting glucose, triglycerides (TG), TC, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and HDL-C levels were measured by standard procedures in the morning between 0800 and 0900 h after an overnight fast and resting in bed during early follicular phase (d 2–5) of the spontaneous or progesterone-induced withdrawal bleeding. Samples were performed 10 min after needle insertion in duplicate and immediately centrifuged, and the serum was stored at −80 C until analysis. The TC/HDL-C ratio was also calculated for each woman (33). Hypertriglyceridemia was diagnosed when triglycerides levels were greater than 250 mg/dl (34), whereas hypercholesterolemia was diagnosed when total cholesterol levels were greater than 240 mg/dl (35). Impaired glucose tolerance was diagnosed after an oral glucose tolerance test (75 g glucose diluted in 250 ml saline solution, measuring blood glucose every 30 min for 2 h). In line with World Health Organization criteria, diabetes mellitus was diagnosed when fasting blood glucose levels were greater than 126 mg/dl in two consecutive determinations or 200 mg/dl or more 2 h after oral glucose; reduced glucose tolerance was diagnosed when blood glucose levels were 126–200 mg/dl 2 h after oral glucose (36). Fasting and glucose load-stimulated insulin levels were measured in patients and controls to estimate the insulin sensitivity; the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index, which is considered an index of insulin resistance (37), was also calculated.

Echocardiographic study.

M-Mode, two-dimensional, and pulsed Doppler echocardiography studies were performed by one operator (L.S.), who was blind with respect to the presence of metabolic abnormalities or arterial hypertension, using ultrasound systems (Apogee CX, Interspec, Inc., Ambler, PA) with a 3.5-mHz transducer during at least three consecutive cardiac cycles. All patients were studied in the left lateral position after a 10-min resting period according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography (38). The following measurements were recorded on M-mode tracing: interventricular septum and LV posterior wall thickness. The frequency-normalized mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV and ESV) and ejection fraction [EF = EDV − ESV/EDV (%)] were estimated according to the Quinones method (39). The LV ejection fraction (LVEF) is normal when it is above 50%. The LVM was calculated by Devereux’s formula according to Penn’s convention with the following regression-corrected cube formula: LVM = 1.04[(ISV + LVID + PWT)3 − (LVID)3] − 14 g. LVH was diagnosed when LVM values, corrected for body surface area [LVM index (LVMi)], were 135 g/m2 or greater in males and 110 g/m2 or greater in females (40). Doppler studies provided indexes of ventricular filling that were derived from the mitral flow velocities curves, i.e. maximal early diastolic flow velocity (E; centimeters per second), maximal late diastolic flow velocity (A; centimeters per second), and the ratio between E and A curves (E/A; normal, >1).

Assays

Plasma LH, FSH, PRL, estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, Δ4-androstenedione, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate were measured by specific RIA as previously described (41, 42). Serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone levels were determined by RIA (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, TX) with a sensitivity of 0.01 ng/ml and intra- and interassay coefficients of variation of 8.9% and 9.0%, respectively. SHBG levels were measured using an immunoradiometric assay, as previously described (28, 43). In each woman the free androgen index (FAI) was calculated using the following formula: testosterone (nmol/liter)/SHBG × 100 (44).

Serum insulin was measured by a solid phase chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay using commercially available kits (Immunolite, Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA). Blood glucose levels were determined by the glucose oxidase method. Serum TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and TG levels were measured with an autoanalyzer (Monarch 1000, Instrumentation Laboratory, Milan, Italy) using commercially available kits (IL TEST, Instrumentation Laboratory) as previously reported (45, 46). Serum LDL-C was evaluated using Friedewald’s formula: TC − HDL-C − 1/5 TG (47).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 11.5.2.1 package (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Data were expressed as the mean ± sd. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relative importance of LVMi, as a dependent variable, against predictor variables: age, BMI, HOMA, FAI, lipid profile, SBP, DBP, and number of cigarettes smoked daily. Differences in physical activity and smoking habitus (percentage of women smoking) were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U test and χ2 test, respectively. The other comparisons between patients and controls were performed using a t test for unpaired data. Significance was set at 5%.

Results

Clinical study (Table 2)

TABLE 2.

Demographic and endocrine profile in 30 young patients with clinical, ultrasonographic, and endocrine diagnosis of PCOS and 30 age- and BMI-matched controls

 PCOSControlsPa
Age (yr)24.3 ± 5.624.8 ± 4.20.70
BMI (kg/m2)28.7 ± 6.727.3 ± 5.00.36
WHR0.94 ± 0.230.87 ± 0.060.11
Physical activity scoreb2.1 ± 0.42.0 ± 0.30.27
Smoking habitus   
    No. of smokers (%)c10 (33.3)8 (26.7)0.57
    No. of cigarettes daily4.2 ± 1.35.6 ± 1.40.15
HR (beats/min)78.3 ± 5.976.2 ± 4.40.12
SBP (mm Hg)112 ± 3.0110 ± 3.80.6
DBP (mm Hg)72 ± 8.167.0 ± 6.00.005
DP (mm Hg)40.1 ± 10.244.7 ± 10.80.26
MBP (mm Hg)84.9 ± 8.380.5 ± 5.70.04
Serum hormone levels   
    FSH (IU/liter)7.8 ± 4.59.1 ± 0.60.15
    LH (IU/liter)23.5 ± 4.59.1 ± 1.5<0.0001
    PRL (μg/liter)14.0 ± 9.212.3 ± 1.10.24
    E2 (pmol/liter)55.8 ± 24.352.2 ± 2.20.32
    17-OH-P (nmol/liter)2.8 ± 3.50.7 ± 0.20.005
    T (nmol/liter)2.4 ± 1.30.5 ± 0.2<0.0001
    A4 (nmol/liter)4.1 ± 1.91.0 ± 0.3<0.0001
    DHEA-S (μmol/liter)4.4 ± 1.34.0 ± 1.00.17
    SHBG (nmol/liter)28.6 ± 5.750.4 ± 3.5<0.0001
    FAI (%)8.6 ± 5.01.0 ± 0.5<0.0001
 PCOSControlsPa
Age (yr)24.3 ± 5.624.8 ± 4.20.70
BMI (kg/m2)28.7 ± 6.727.3 ± 5.00.36
WHR0.94 ± 0.230.87 ± 0.060.11
Physical activity scoreb2.1 ± 0.42.0 ± 0.30.27
Smoking habitus   
    No. of smokers (%)c10 (33.3)8 (26.7)0.57
    No. of cigarettes daily4.2 ± 1.35.6 ± 1.40.15
HR (beats/min)78.3 ± 5.976.2 ± 4.40.12
SBP (mm Hg)112 ± 3.0110 ± 3.80.6
DBP (mm Hg)72 ± 8.167.0 ± 6.00.005
DP (mm Hg)40.1 ± 10.244.7 ± 10.80.26
MBP (mm Hg)84.9 ± 8.380.5 ± 5.70.04
Serum hormone levels   
    FSH (IU/liter)7.8 ± 4.59.1 ± 0.60.15
    LH (IU/liter)23.5 ± 4.59.1 ± 1.5<0.0001
    PRL (μg/liter)14.0 ± 9.212.3 ± 1.10.24
    E2 (pmol/liter)55.8 ± 24.352.2 ± 2.20.32
    17-OH-P (nmol/liter)2.8 ± 3.50.7 ± 0.20.005
    T (nmol/liter)2.4 ± 1.30.5 ± 0.2<0.0001
    A4 (nmol/liter)4.1 ± 1.91.0 ± 0.3<0.0001
    DHEA-S (μmol/liter)4.4 ± 1.34.0 ± 1.00.17
    SHBG (nmol/liter)28.6 ± 5.750.4 ± 3.5<0.0001
    FAI (%)8.6 ± 5.01.0 ± 0.5<0.0001

WHR, Waist/hip ratio; HR, heart rate; DP, differential pressure; MBP, mean blood pressure; E2, estradiol; 17-OH-P, 17-hydroxyprogesterone; T, testosterone; A, androstenedione; DHEA-S, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate.

a

By unpaired t test except when indicated.

b

By Mann-Whitney U test.

c

By χb test.

TABLE 2.

Demographic and endocrine profile in 30 young patients with clinical, ultrasonographic, and endocrine diagnosis of PCOS and 30 age- and BMI-matched controls

 PCOSControlsPa
Age (yr)24.3 ± 5.624.8 ± 4.20.70
BMI (kg/m2)28.7 ± 6.727.3 ± 5.00.36
WHR0.94 ± 0.230.87 ± 0.060.11
Physical activity scoreb2.1 ± 0.42.0 ± 0.30.27
Smoking habitus   
    No. of smokers (%)c10 (33.3)8 (26.7)0.57
    No. of cigarettes daily4.2 ± 1.35.6 ± 1.40.15
HR (beats/min)78.3 ± 5.976.2 ± 4.40.12
SBP (mm Hg)112 ± 3.0110 ± 3.80.6
DBP (mm Hg)72 ± 8.167.0 ± 6.00.005
DP (mm Hg)40.1 ± 10.244.7 ± 10.80.26
MBP (mm Hg)84.9 ± 8.380.5 ± 5.70.04
Serum hormone levels   
    FSH (IU/liter)7.8 ± 4.59.1 ± 0.60.15
    LH (IU/liter)23.5 ± 4.59.1 ± 1.5<0.0001
    PRL (μg/liter)14.0 ± 9.212.3 ± 1.10.24
    E2 (pmol/liter)55.8 ± 24.352.2 ± 2.20.32
    17-OH-P (nmol/liter)2.8 ± 3.50.7 ± 0.20.005
    T (nmol/liter)2.4 ± 1.30.5 ± 0.2<0.0001
    A4 (nmol/liter)4.1 ± 1.91.0 ± 0.3<0.0001
    DHEA-S (μmol/liter)4.4 ± 1.34.0 ± 1.00.17
    SHBG (nmol/liter)28.6 ± 5.750.4 ± 3.5<0.0001
    FAI (%)8.6 ± 5.01.0 ± 0.5<0.0001
 PCOSControlsPa
Age (yr)24.3 ± 5.624.8 ± 4.20.70
BMI (kg/m2)28.7 ± 6.727.3 ± 5.00.36
WHR0.94 ± 0.230.87 ± 0.060.11
Physical activity scoreb2.1 ± 0.42.0 ± 0.30.27
Smoking habitus   
    No. of smokers (%)c10 (33.3)8 (26.7)0.57
    No. of cigarettes daily4.2 ± 1.35.6 ± 1.40.15
HR (beats/min)78.3 ± 5.976.2 ± 4.40.12
SBP (mm Hg)112 ± 3.0110 ± 3.80.6
DBP (mm Hg)72 ± 8.167.0 ± 6.00.005
DP (mm Hg)40.1 ± 10.244.7 ± 10.80.26
MBP (mm Hg)84.9 ± 8.380.5 ± 5.70.04
Serum hormone levels   
    FSH (IU/liter)7.8 ± 4.59.1 ± 0.60.15
    LH (IU/liter)23.5 ± 4.59.1 ± 1.5<0.0001
    PRL (μg/liter)14.0 ± 9.212.3 ± 1.10.24
    E2 (pmol/liter)55.8 ± 24.352.2 ± 2.20.32
    17-OH-P (nmol/liter)2.8 ± 3.50.7 ± 0.20.005
    T (nmol/liter)2.4 ± 1.30.5 ± 0.2<0.0001
    A4 (nmol/liter)4.1 ± 1.91.0 ± 0.3<0.0001
    DHEA-S (μmol/liter)4.4 ± 1.34.0 ± 1.00.17
    SHBG (nmol/liter)28.6 ± 5.750.4 ± 3.5<0.0001
    FAI (%)8.6 ± 5.01.0 ± 0.5<0.0001

WHR, Waist/hip ratio; HR, heart rate; DP, differential pressure; MBP, mean blood pressure; E2, estradiol; 17-OH-P, 17-hydroxyprogesterone; T, testosterone; A, androstenedione; DHEA-S, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate.

a

By unpaired t test except when indicated.

b

By Mann-Whitney U test.

c

By χb test.

As expected, PCOS patients had significantly (P < 0.05) higher LH, testosterone, Δ4-androstenedione, and SHBG levels than controls. DBP and mean blood pressure were also significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the patients than in the controls, whereas SBP and heart rate were similar in the two groups. The endocrine parameters were in line with the diagnosis of PCOS in the patients group. In particular, the FAI was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in patients than controls.

Biochemical study (Table 3)

TABLE 3.

Metabolic profile and cardiovascular risk factors in women with and without PCOS

 PCOSControlsP
Fasting glucose (mmol/liter)5.3 ± 2.62.6 ± 0.6<0.0001
Fasting insulin (pmol/liter)12.9 ± 5.22.3 ± 0.9<0.0001
HOMA3.2 ± 2.00.3 ± 0.1<0.0001
TC (mmol/liter)4.2 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.4<0.0001
LDL-C (mmol/liter)2.3 ± 0.41.8 ± 0.3<0.0001
HDL-C (mmol/liter)2.5 ± 0.52.9 ± 0.3<0.0001
TC/HDL-C ratio1.7 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.4<0.0001
TG (mmol/liter)1.5 ± 0.21.4 ± 0.20.06
 PCOSControlsP
Fasting glucose (mmol/liter)5.3 ± 2.62.6 ± 0.6<0.0001
Fasting insulin (pmol/liter)12.9 ± 5.22.3 ± 0.9<0.0001
HOMA3.2 ± 2.00.3 ± 0.1<0.0001
TC (mmol/liter)4.2 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.4<0.0001
LDL-C (mmol/liter)2.3 ± 0.41.8 ± 0.3<0.0001
HDL-C (mmol/liter)2.5 ± 0.52.9 ± 0.3<0.0001
TC/HDL-C ratio1.7 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.4<0.0001
TG (mmol/liter)1.5 ± 0.21.4 ± 0.20.06
TABLE 3.

Metabolic profile and cardiovascular risk factors in women with and without PCOS

 PCOSControlsP
Fasting glucose (mmol/liter)5.3 ± 2.62.6 ± 0.6<0.0001
Fasting insulin (pmol/liter)12.9 ± 5.22.3 ± 0.9<0.0001
HOMA3.2 ± 2.00.3 ± 0.1<0.0001
TC (mmol/liter)4.2 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.4<0.0001
LDL-C (mmol/liter)2.3 ± 0.41.8 ± 0.3<0.0001
HDL-C (mmol/liter)2.5 ± 0.52.9 ± 0.3<0.0001
TC/HDL-C ratio1.7 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.4<0.0001
TG (mmol/liter)1.5 ± 0.21.4 ± 0.20.06
 PCOSControlsP
Fasting glucose (mmol/liter)5.3 ± 2.62.6 ± 0.6<0.0001
Fasting insulin (pmol/liter)12.9 ± 5.22.3 ± 0.9<0.0001
HOMA3.2 ± 2.00.3 ± 0.1<0.0001
TC (mmol/liter)4.2 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.4<0.0001
LDL-C (mmol/liter)2.3 ± 0.41.8 ± 0.3<0.0001
HDL-C (mmol/liter)2.5 ± 0.52.9 ± 0.3<0.0001
TC/HDL-C ratio1.7 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.4<0.0001
TG (mmol/liter)1.5 ± 0.21.4 ± 0.20.06

PCOS patients had significantly (P < 0.05) higher fasting glucose and insulin levels, HOMA, TC, LDL-C, and TC/HDL-C ratio, whereas HDL-C levels were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than control values. TG levels were similar in patients and controls. Neither the patients nor the controls had hypercholesterolemia or hypertriglyceridemia.

Echocardiography study (Table 4)

TABLE 4.

Echocardiographic findings in PCOS and controls

 PCOSControlsP
LV diastolic diameter (mm)46.0 ± 3.942.9 ± 1.70.1
LV systolic diameter (mm)26.6 ± 4.323.0 ± 1.80.001
IST (mm)8.3 ± 1.26.7 ± 0.8<0.0001
LV posterior wall thickness (mm)8.1 ± 1.56.6 ± 0.8<0.0001
LVMi (g/m2)80.5 ± 14.856.1 ± 5.4<0.0001
Left atrium size (mm)32.0 ± 4.927.4 ± 2.1<0.0001
Aorta size (mm)28.9 ± 3.528.0 ± 1.30.1
LVEF (%)64.4 ± 4.167.1 ± 2.60.003
Early to late mitral flow velocity1.6 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.2<0.0001
 PCOSControlsP
LV diastolic diameter (mm)46.0 ± 3.942.9 ± 1.70.1
LV systolic diameter (mm)26.6 ± 4.323.0 ± 1.80.001
IST (mm)8.3 ± 1.26.7 ± 0.8<0.0001
LV posterior wall thickness (mm)8.1 ± 1.56.6 ± 0.8<0.0001
LVMi (g/m2)80.5 ± 14.856.1 ± 5.4<0.0001
Left atrium size (mm)32.0 ± 4.927.4 ± 2.1<0.0001
Aorta size (mm)28.9 ± 3.528.0 ± 1.30.1
LVEF (%)64.4 ± 4.167.1 ± 2.60.003
Early to late mitral flow velocity1.6 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.2<0.0001

IST, Interventricular septum thickness.

TABLE 4.

Echocardiographic findings in PCOS and controls

 PCOSControlsP
LV diastolic diameter (mm)46.0 ± 3.942.9 ± 1.70.1
LV systolic diameter (mm)26.6 ± 4.323.0 ± 1.80.001
IST (mm)8.3 ± 1.26.7 ± 0.8<0.0001
LV posterior wall thickness (mm)8.1 ± 1.56.6 ± 0.8<0.0001
LVMi (g/m2)80.5 ± 14.856.1 ± 5.4<0.0001
Left atrium size (mm)32.0 ± 4.927.4 ± 2.1<0.0001
Aorta size (mm)28.9 ± 3.528.0 ± 1.30.1
LVEF (%)64.4 ± 4.167.1 ± 2.60.003
Early to late mitral flow velocity1.6 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.2<0.0001
 PCOSControlsP
LV diastolic diameter (mm)46.0 ± 3.942.9 ± 1.70.1
LV systolic diameter (mm)26.6 ± 4.323.0 ± 1.80.001
IST (mm)8.3 ± 1.26.7 ± 0.8<0.0001
LV posterior wall thickness (mm)8.1 ± 1.56.6 ± 0.8<0.0001
LVMi (g/m2)80.5 ± 14.856.1 ± 5.4<0.0001
Left atrium size (mm)32.0 ± 4.927.4 ± 2.1<0.0001
Aorta size (mm)28.9 ± 3.528.0 ± 1.30.1
LVEF (%)64.4 ± 4.167.1 ± 2.60.003
Early to late mitral flow velocity1.6 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.2<0.0001

IST, Interventricular septum thickness.

Young women with PCOS had a cardiac size significantly (P < 0.05) increased compared with controls. They had also interventricular septum, LV posterior wall thickness, ESV, and LVMi significantly (P < 0.05) higher than controls. Two of 30 (6.7%) had LVH (>110 g/m2). Additionally, PCOS patients had significantly (P < 0.05) lower LVEF and E/A than controls, although all patients had normal LVEF, and two patients had abnormal E/A (6.7%).

When patients and controls were grouped according to BMI into three groups, namely subjects of normal weight (BMI, >18 < 25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI, 25.1–30 kg/m2), and obese (BMI, >30 kg/m2), it was observed that the majority of the differences in the metabolic profile and cardiac findings persisted (Table 5). As expected, there was a progressive impairment of metabolic profile and echocardiographic pattern from patients with normal weight to those with obesity (Table 5). Interestingly, normal weight PCOS women had a significant (P < 0.05) increase in LVMi and a decrease in diastolic filling, but no difference in TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TC/HDL-C ratio, or TG, compared with controls. The other two groups had the same pattern described in the series of patients as a whole.

TABLE 5.

Main cardiovascular risk factors and echocardiographic findings in patients and controls according to BMI

 BMI 18–25 kg/m2BMI 25.1–30 kg/m2BMI >30 kg/m2
PCOSControlsPPCOSControlsPPCOSControlsP
No.1212 66 1212 
FAI (%)9.1 ± 6.21.0 ± 0.5<0.000110.8 ± 2.50.8 ± 0.5<0.00017.1 ± 5.01.1 ± 0.4<0.0001
Fasting insulin (pmol/liter)9.0 ± 4.3a2.2 ± 0.8<0.000110.3 ± 3.0a2.7 ± 1.0<0.000118 ± 7.32.3 ± 1.0<0.0001
HOMA1.8 ± 0.8b0.3 ± 0.1<0.00012.5 ± 1.2a0.3 ± 0.10.0014.9 ± 3.70.3 ± 0.1<0.0001
TC (mmol/liter)3.6 ± 0.43.4 ± 0.30.1804.6 ± 0.63.5 ± 0.50.0064.8 ± 0.53.7 ± 0.4<0.0001
LDL-C (mmol/liter)2.0 ± 0.41.7 ± 0.30.1422.3 ± 0.31.8 ± 0.20.0072.5 ± 0.51.9 ± 0.40.004
HDL-C (mmol/liter)2.4 ± 0.62.7 ± 0.30.1362.5 ± 0.32.9 ± 0.20.0222.6 ± 0.33.0 ± 0.40.011
TC/HDL-C ratio1.5 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.30.0501.8 ± 0.51.2 ± 0.40.0451.8 ± 0.31.2 ± 0.50.002
TG (mmol/liter)1.3 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.30.3471.5 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.20.5121.6 ± 0.21.5 ± 0.20.234
LVMi (g/m2)70.2 ± 19.1a56.2 ± 4.30.02177.7 ± 8.256.3 ± 8.70.00192.2 ± 1455.8 ± 4.9<0.0001
LVEF (%)65.9 ± 3.467.7 ± 3.00.18365.5 ± 4.866.2 ± 2.60.76062.2 ± 3.766.7 ± 1.90.001
Early to late mitral flow velocity1.7 ± 0.32.0 ± 0.10.0031.4 ± 0.31.9 ± 0.10.0031.5 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.1<0.0001
 BMI 18–25 kg/m2BMI 25.1–30 kg/m2BMI >30 kg/m2
PCOSControlsPPCOSControlsPPCOSControlsP
No.1212 66 1212 
FAI (%)9.1 ± 6.21.0 ± 0.5<0.000110.8 ± 2.50.8 ± 0.5<0.00017.1 ± 5.01.1 ± 0.4<0.0001
Fasting insulin (pmol/liter)9.0 ± 4.3a2.2 ± 0.8<0.000110.3 ± 3.0a2.7 ± 1.0<0.000118 ± 7.32.3 ± 1.0<0.0001
HOMA1.8 ± 0.8b0.3 ± 0.1<0.00012.5 ± 1.2a0.3 ± 0.10.0014.9 ± 3.70.3 ± 0.1<0.0001
TC (mmol/liter)3.6 ± 0.43.4 ± 0.30.1804.6 ± 0.63.5 ± 0.50.0064.8 ± 0.53.7 ± 0.4<0.0001
LDL-C (mmol/liter)2.0 ± 0.41.7 ± 0.30.1422.3 ± 0.31.8 ± 0.20.0072.5 ± 0.51.9 ± 0.40.004
HDL-C (mmol/liter)2.4 ± 0.62.7 ± 0.30.1362.5 ± 0.32.9 ± 0.20.0222.6 ± 0.33.0 ± 0.40.011
TC/HDL-C ratio1.5 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.30.0501.8 ± 0.51.2 ± 0.40.0451.8 ± 0.31.2 ± 0.50.002
TG (mmol/liter)1.3 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.30.3471.5 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.20.5121.6 ± 0.21.5 ± 0.20.234
LVMi (g/m2)70.2 ± 19.1a56.2 ± 4.30.02177.7 ± 8.256.3 ± 8.70.00192.2 ± 1455.8 ± 4.9<0.0001
LVEF (%)65.9 ± 3.467.7 ± 3.00.18365.5 ± 4.866.2 ± 2.60.76062.2 ± 3.766.7 ± 1.90.001
Early to late mitral flow velocity1.7 ± 0.32.0 ± 0.10.0031.4 ± 0.31.9 ± 0.10.0031.5 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.1<0.0001
a

P < 0.05 vs. PCOS patients with BMI greater than 30 kg/m2.

b

P < 0.05 vs. PCOS patients with BMI of 25.1–30 and greater than 30 kg/m2.

TABLE 5.

Main cardiovascular risk factors and echocardiographic findings in patients and controls according to BMI

 BMI 18–25 kg/m2BMI 25.1–30 kg/m2BMI >30 kg/m2
PCOSControlsPPCOSControlsPPCOSControlsP
No.1212 66 1212 
FAI (%)9.1 ± 6.21.0 ± 0.5<0.000110.8 ± 2.50.8 ± 0.5<0.00017.1 ± 5.01.1 ± 0.4<0.0001
Fasting insulin (pmol/liter)9.0 ± 4.3a2.2 ± 0.8<0.000110.3 ± 3.0a2.7 ± 1.0<0.000118 ± 7.32.3 ± 1.0<0.0001
HOMA1.8 ± 0.8b0.3 ± 0.1<0.00012.5 ± 1.2a0.3 ± 0.10.0014.9 ± 3.70.3 ± 0.1<0.0001
TC (mmol/liter)3.6 ± 0.43.4 ± 0.30.1804.6 ± 0.63.5 ± 0.50.0064.8 ± 0.53.7 ± 0.4<0.0001
LDL-C (mmol/liter)2.0 ± 0.41.7 ± 0.30.1422.3 ± 0.31.8 ± 0.20.0072.5 ± 0.51.9 ± 0.40.004
HDL-C (mmol/liter)2.4 ± 0.62.7 ± 0.30.1362.5 ± 0.32.9 ± 0.20.0222.6 ± 0.33.0 ± 0.40.011
TC/HDL-C ratio1.5 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.30.0501.8 ± 0.51.2 ± 0.40.0451.8 ± 0.31.2 ± 0.50.002
TG (mmol/liter)1.3 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.30.3471.5 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.20.5121.6 ± 0.21.5 ± 0.20.234
LVMi (g/m2)70.2 ± 19.1a56.2 ± 4.30.02177.7 ± 8.256.3 ± 8.70.00192.2 ± 1455.8 ± 4.9<0.0001
LVEF (%)65.9 ± 3.467.7 ± 3.00.18365.5 ± 4.866.2 ± 2.60.76062.2 ± 3.766.7 ± 1.90.001
Early to late mitral flow velocity1.7 ± 0.32.0 ± 0.10.0031.4 ± 0.31.9 ± 0.10.0031.5 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.1<0.0001
 BMI 18–25 kg/m2BMI 25.1–30 kg/m2BMI >30 kg/m2
PCOSControlsPPCOSControlsPPCOSControlsP
No.1212 66 1212 
FAI (%)9.1 ± 6.21.0 ± 0.5<0.000110.8 ± 2.50.8 ± 0.5<0.00017.1 ± 5.01.1 ± 0.4<0.0001
Fasting insulin (pmol/liter)9.0 ± 4.3a2.2 ± 0.8<0.000110.3 ± 3.0a2.7 ± 1.0<0.000118 ± 7.32.3 ± 1.0<0.0001
HOMA1.8 ± 0.8b0.3 ± 0.1<0.00012.5 ± 1.2a0.3 ± 0.10.0014.9 ± 3.70.3 ± 0.1<0.0001
TC (mmol/liter)3.6 ± 0.43.4 ± 0.30.1804.6 ± 0.63.5 ± 0.50.0064.8 ± 0.53.7 ± 0.4<0.0001
LDL-C (mmol/liter)2.0 ± 0.41.7 ± 0.30.1422.3 ± 0.31.8 ± 0.20.0072.5 ± 0.51.9 ± 0.40.004
HDL-C (mmol/liter)2.4 ± 0.62.7 ± 0.30.1362.5 ± 0.32.9 ± 0.20.0222.6 ± 0.33.0 ± 0.40.011
TC/HDL-C ratio1.5 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.30.0501.8 ± 0.51.2 ± 0.40.0451.8 ± 0.31.2 ± 0.50.002
TG (mmol/liter)1.3 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.30.3471.5 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.20.5121.6 ± 0.21.5 ± 0.20.234
LVMi (g/m2)70.2 ± 19.1a56.2 ± 4.30.02177.7 ± 8.256.3 ± 8.70.00192.2 ± 1455.8 ± 4.9<0.0001
LVEF (%)65.9 ± 3.467.7 ± 3.00.18365.5 ± 4.866.2 ± 2.60.76062.2 ± 3.766.7 ± 1.90.001
Early to late mitral flow velocity1.7 ± 0.32.0 ± 0.10.0031.4 ± 0.31.9 ± 0.10.0031.5 ± 0.42.1 ± 0.1<0.0001
a

P < 0.05 vs. PCOS patients with BMI greater than 30 kg/m2.

b

P < 0.05 vs. PCOS patients with BMI of 25.1–30 and greater than 30 kg/m2.

The final model of stepwise multiple linear regression analysis in PCOS patients showed that LVMi is linearly related only to HOMA (coefficient = 6.764; β =0.874; P < 0.0001; constant = 58.647).

Discussion

The results of this prospective controlled study in selected young women with PCOS showed a significant impairment of glucose and lipid profile associated with an increased LVM and decreased LV performance and diastolic filling. Most of these abnormalities persisted even in young patients with normal weight, suggesting that the pathogenesis of cardiac abnormalities in PCOS is not only dependent on BMI. In fact, only in the patients was LVMi significantly correlated with both BMI and HOMA index.

PCOS women represent an intriguing biological model illustrating hormonal effects on cardiovascular risk. In fact, several findings indicate a relationship between heart disease and PCOS, i.e. dyslipidemia (9), insulin resistance (3, 7), increased LVM, and diastolic dysfunction (48, 49). PCOS as a putative cause of CVD is, however, still questioned, because definitive data to demonstrate a direct influence of PCOS on heart disease are still lacking (5052). On the basis of the multiple findings linking CVD with PCOS, we designed this prospective controlled study to investigate different variables affecting heart structure and function. We selected a group of young patients to exclude any role of long-standing undiagnosed PCOS and investigated the early phases of the disease. To better understand the role of increased BMI frequent in PCOS, we included a group of lean patients and controls. This would allow us to detect cardiac abnormalities not related to overweight and obesity.

PCOS women were reported to have higher TG levels and lower HDL-C values (53). Because insulin is a major positive regulator of lipoprotein lipase that is involved in the pathway of HDL-C production, dyslipidemia is probably secondary to insulin resistance, although hyperandrogenism may affect lipoproteins and lipids independently of insulin levels and body weight (9). In our series we confirmed an unfavorable lipid profile; however, we did not find any increase in TG levels. Our young patients with PCOS had an increase in TC and a decrease in HDL-C levels as major findings associated with increased glucose and insulin levels and HOMA index. We also confirmed increased LVM and diastolic dysfunction in young PCOS women. Interestingly, these abnormal echocardiographic aspects were present even in the 12 normal weight women who did not show alterations in lipid profile. Furthermore, these young PCOS women showed greater LVMi than their age- and BMI-matched controls. Although it is well known that ventricular mass indexed for height is significantly higher in overweight than in normal weight subjects (54), our PCOS women showed an increased LVMi that was not weight dependent. Therefore, PCOS could be considered an aggravating factor causing LVH and could play a role in the early cardiovascular disease in PCOS. Among the various echocardiographic parameters that were different between PCOS and controls, the increased LVMi in young PCOS patients has clinical importance, because it represents the main cause of both LVH and diastolic dysfunction in PCOS women, worsening from early to elderly age.

LVH is one of the several metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors associated with insulin resistance (55) and/or visceral obesity (56). In our series, there was a linear relation between LVMi and HOMA. Hyperinsulinemia is a predictor of coronary artery disease (5760), and insulin resistance has been proposed as the key factor linking hypertension, glucose intolerance, obesity, lipid abnormalities, and coronary heart disease in an association called metabolic syndrome X (61). In fact, the increased LVM in PCOS women could be caused by an increase in blood pressure, even in the absence of hypertension (62). Indeed, in our series we found slightly increased mean blood pressure and DBP in PCOS women compared with controls.

In accord with previous studies (48, 49), we also report diastolic dysfunction in PCOS. Specifically, Tiras et al. (49) suggested that patients with PCOS have diastolic dysfunction; furthermore, no difference in E/A was observed between PCOS and control women. On the contrary, we showed both reduced ejection fraction of LV and E/A, suggesting impaired LV diastolic filling. However, whether the E/A ratio is an early predictor of diastolic dysfunction in PCOS remains to be determined. In addition, Prelevic et al. (63) reported that systolic flow velocity is lower in PCOS than in age-matched control women, and there is an inverse relationship between serum fasting insulin and LV systolic outflow parameters; furthermore, increased insulin levels in PCOS are associated with decreased cardiac flow (63).

Although we did not find any association between LVM or diastolic dysfunction and hyperandrogenism, cross-sectional data consistently showed a strong obesity-independent association of androgen excess in women with a cluster of CVD risk factors, including insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and impaired fibrinolysis. It was therefore suggested that the chronically abnormal hormonal and metabolic milieu found in women with PCOS, starting from adolescence, may predispose these women to premature atherosclerosis. Furthermore, based on calculated risk profiles, PCOS women were predicted to have a 7-fold increased relative risk for myocardial infarction; in fact, Birdsall et al. (11) showed significant associations between the presence of polycystic ovaries and the presence and severity of cardiovascular artery disease and a family history of myocardial infarction as well as with elevated levels of insulin and TG and lower levels of HDL-C (11).

Some findings of clinical studies showed that women with CVD were affected more frequently than controls by clinical symptoms of androgen excess, such as hirsutism and polycystic ovaries (3, 4, 50, 64). Because many women with PCOS are overweight, and most, if not all, are insulin resistant, it is a matter of debate whether these symptoms are secondary to obesity and insulin resistance or whether hyperandrogenism itself contributes to obesity, insulin resistance, and hyperinsulinemia.

Our findings suggest that young PCOS women have increased LVM and diastolic dysfunction, neither of which is weight dependent, demonstrating that PCOS women are candidates for early CVD. Additional studies are needed to better clarify the exact role of insulin resistance and/or hyperandrogenism in the CVD, particularly in the complex etiopathogenetic scenario of the increased LVM in young PCOS patients.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Francesco Manguso (Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Gastroenterology Unit, “Federico II” University, Naples, Italy) for his invaluable assistance in statistical analysis.

Abbreviations:

     
  • BMI,

    Body mass index;

  •  
  • CV,

    cardiovascular;

  •  
  • CVD,

    CV disease;

  •  
  • DBP,

    diastolic blood pressure;

  •  
  • E/A,

    maximal early diastolic flow velocity/maximal late diastolic flow velocity ratio;

  •  
  • EDV,

    end-diastolic volume;

  •  
  • ESV,

    end-systolic volume;

  •  
  • FAI,

    free androgen index;

  •  
  • HDL-C,

    high density lipoprotein cholesterol;

  •  
  • HOMA,

    homeostasis model assessment;

  •  
  • LDL-C,

    low density lipoprotein cholesterol;

  •  
  • LV,

    left ventricular;

  •  
  • LVEF,

    LV ejection fraction;

  •  
  • LVH,

    LV hypertrophy;

  •  
  • LVM,

    LV mass;

  •  
  • LVMi,

    LV mass index;

  •  
  • PCOS,

    polycystic ovary syndrome;

  •  
  • PRL,

    prolactin;

  •  
  • SBP,

    systolic blood pressure;

  •  
  • TC,

    total cholesterol;

  •  
  • TG,

    triglycerides.

1

Franks
S

1995
Polycystic ovary syndrome.
N Engl J Med
333
:
853
861
2

Scarpitta
AM
,
Sinagra
D

2000
Polycystic ovary syndrome: an endocrine and metabolic disease.
Gynecol Endocrinol
14
:
392
395
3

Dunaif
A

1997
Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome: mechanism and implications for pathogenesis.
Endocr Rev
18
:
774
800
4

Lobo
RA
,
Carmina
E

2000
The importance of diagnosing the polycystic ovary syndrome.
Ann Intern Med
132
:
989
993
5

Chang
RJ
,
Nakamura
RM
,
Judd
HL
,
Kaplan
SA

1983
Insulin resistance in nonobese patients with polycystic ovarian disease.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
57
:
356
359
6

Franks
S

2001
Are women with polycystic ovary syndrome at increased risk of cardiovascular disease? Too early to be sure, but not too early to act!
Am J Med
111
:
665
666
7

Ovalle
F
,
Azziz
R

2002
Insulin resistance, polycystic ovary syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Fertil Steril
77
:
1095
1105
8

Holte
J
,
Gennarelli
G
,
Berne
C
,
Bergh
T
,
Lithell
H

1996
Elevated ambulatory day-time blood pressure in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a sign of a pre-hypertensive state?
Hum Reprod
11
:
23
28
9

Wild
RA
,
Painter
PC
,
Coulson
PB
,
Carruth
KB
,
Ranney
GB

1985
Lipoprotein lipid concentrations and cardiovascular risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
61
:
946
951
10

Cibula
D
,
Cifkova
R
,
Fanta
M
,
Poledne
R
,
Zivny
J
,
Skibova
J

2000
Increased risk of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and coronary artery disease in perimenopausal women with a history of the polycystic ovary syndrome.
Hum Reprod
15
:
785
789
11

Birdsall
MA
,
Farquhar
CM
,
White
HD

1997
Association between polycystic ovaries and extent of coronary artery disease in women having cardiac catheterization.
Ann Intern Med
126
:
32
35
12

Christian
RC
,
Dumesic
DA
,
Behrenbeck
T
,
Oberg
AL
,
Sheedy II
PF
,
Fitzpatrick
LA

2003
Prevalence and predictors of coronary artery disease calcification in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
88
:
2562
2568
13

Dahlgren
E
,
Janson
PO
,
Johansson
S
,
Lapidus
L
,
Oden
A

1992
Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk for myocardial infarction. Evaluated from a risk factor model based on a prospective population study of women.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
71
:
599
604
14

Talbott
E
,
Guzick
D
,
Clerici
A
,
Berga
S
,
Detre
K
,
Weimer
K
,
Kuller
L

1995
Coronary heart disease risk factors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
15
:
821
826
15

Conway
GS
,
Agrawal
R
,
Betteridge
DJ
,
Jacobs
HS

1992
Risk factors for coronary heart disease in lean and obese women with the polycystic ovary syndrome.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
37
:
119
125
16

Talbott
E
,
Guzick
DS
,
Sutton-Tyrrell
K
,
McHugh-Pemu
KP
,
Zborowski
JV
,
Remsberg
KE
,
Kuller
LH

2000
Evidence for association between polycystic ovary syndrome and premature carotid atherosclerosis in middle-aged women.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
20
:
2414
2421
17

Paradisi
G
,
Steinberg
HO
,
Hempfling
A
,
Cronin
J
,
Hook
G
,
Shepard
MK
,
Baron
AD

2001
Polycystic ovary syndrome is associated with endothelial dysfunction.
Circulation
103
:
1410
1415
18

Kelly
CJG
,
Speirs
A
,
Gould
GW
,
Petrie
JR
,
Lyall
H
,
Connell
JMC

2002
Altered vascular function in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
87
:
742
746
19

Harjai
KJ

1999
Potential new cardiovascular risk factors: left ventricular hypertrophy, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), triglycerides, oxidative stress, and fibrinogen.
Ann Intern Med
131
:
376
386
20

Levy
D
,
Garrison
RH
,
Savage
DD
,
Kannell
WB
,
Castelli
WP

1991
Prognostic implication of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study.
N Engl J Med
322
:
1561
1566
21

Koren
MJ
,
Devereux
RB
,
Casale
PN
,
Savane
DD
,
Laragh
JH

1991
Relation of the left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension.
Ann Intern Med
114
:
345
352
22

Vaccaro
O
,
Cardoni
O
,
Cuomo
V
,
Panarelli
W
,
Laurenzi
M
,
Mancini
M
,
Riccardi
G
,
Zanchetti
A

2003
Relationship between plasma insulin and left ventricular mass in normotensive participants of the Gubbio study.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
58
:
316
322
23

de

Simone
G
,
Pasanisi
F
,
Contaldo
F

2001
Link of nonhemodynamic factors to hemodynamic determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy.
Hypertension
38
:
13
18
24

de

Simone
G
,
Devereux
RB
,
Roman
MJ
,
Halderman
MH
,
Laragh
JH

1994
Relation of obesity and gender to left ventricular hypertrophy in normotensive adults.
Hypertension
23
:
600
606
25

Ferriman
D
,
Gallwey
JD

1961
Clinical assessment of body hair growth in women.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
21
:
1440
1447
26

Fulghesu
AM
,
Ciampelli
M
,
Belosi
C
,
Apa
R
,
Pavone
V
,
Lanzone
A

2001
A new ultrasound criterion for the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome: the ovarian stroma/total area ratio.
Fertil Steril
76
:
326
331
27

Balen
AH
,
Laven
JSE
,
Tan
S-L
,
Dewailly
D

2003
Ultrasound assessment of the polycystic ovary: international consensus definitions.
Hum Reprod Update
9
:
505
514
28

Orio Jr
F
,
Palomba
S
,
Colao
A
,
Tenuta
M
,
Dentico
C
,
Peretta
M
,
Lombardi
G
,
Nappi
C
,
Orio
F

2001
Growth hormone secretion after baclofen administration in different phases of the menstrual cycle in healthy women.
Horm Res
55
:
131
136
29

Azziz
R
,
Zacur
HA

1989
21-Hydroxylase deficiency in female hyperandrogenism: screening and diagnosis.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
69
:
577
584
30

Colao
A
,
Pivonello
P
,
Spiezia
S
,
Faggiano
A
,
Ferone
D
,
Filippella, Marzullo
P
,
Cerbone
G
,
Siciliani
M
,
Lombardi
G

1999
Persistence of increased cardiovascular risk in patients with Cushing’s disease after five years of successful cure.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
84
:
2664
2672
31

1983
Obesity. A report of the Royal College of Physicians.
J R Coll Physicians Lond
17
:
5
65
32

Yanovski
SZ

1993
A practical approach to treatment of the obese patient.
Arch Fam Med
2
:
309
316
33

Castelli
WP

1996
Lipid, risk factors and ischaemic heart disease
.
Atherosclerosis
124
(
Suppl
):
S1
S9
34

Consensus Conference

1984
Treatment of hypertriglyceridemia.
JAMA
251
:
1196
1200
35

Expert Panel: Report of the National Cholesterol Education

1988
Program expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults.
Arch Intern Med
148
:
36
39
36

Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus

1997
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.
Diabetes Care
20
:
1183
1197
37

Matthews
DR
,
Hosker
JP
,
Rudenski
AS
,
Naylor
BA
,
Treacher
DF
,
Turner
RC

1985
Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man.
Diabetologia
28
:
412
419
38

Feigenbaum
H

1979
Echocardiography, 2nd ed.
Philadelphia
:
Lea and Febiger
39

Quinones
MA
,
Waggoner
AD
,
Reduto
LA
,
Nelson
JG
,
Young
JB
,
Winters Jr
WL
,
Ribeiro
LG
,
Miller
RR

1981
A new simplified and accurate method for determining ejection fraction with two-dimensional echocardiography.
Circulation
64
:
744
753
40

Devereux
RB
,
Lutas
EM
,
Casale
PN
,
Kligfield
P
,
Eisenberg
RR
,
Hammond
IW
,
Miller
DH
,
Reis
G
,
Alderman
MH
,
Laragh
JH

1984
Standardization of M-mode echocardiographic left ventricular anatomic measurements.
J Am Coll Cardiol
4
:
1222
1230
41

Orio Jr
F
,
Palomba
S
,
Colao
A
,
Russo
T
,
Dentico
C
,
Tauchmanovà
L
,
Savastano
S
,
Nappi
C
,
Sultan
C
,
Zullo
F
,
Lombardi
G

2003
GH release after GHRH plus arginine administration in obese and overweight women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
J Endocrinol Invest
26
:
117
122
42

Orio Jr
F
,
Lucidi
P
,
Palomba
S
,
Tauchmanovà
L
,
Cascella
T
,
Russo
T
,
Zullo
F
,
Colao
A
,
Lombardi
G
,
De Feo
P

2003
Circulating ghrelin concentrations in the polycystic ovary syndrome.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
88
:
942
945
43

Orio Jr
F
,
Palomba
S
,
Di Biase
S
,
Colao
A
,
Tauchmanovà
L
,
Savastano
S
,
Labella
D
,
Russo
T
,
Zullo
F
,
Lombardi
G

2003
Homocysteine levels and C677T polymorphism of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
88
:
673
679
44

Morley
JE
,
Patrick
P
,
Perry III
HM

2002
Evaluation of assays available to measure free testosterone.
Metabolism
5
:
554
559
45

Palomba
S
,
Affinito
P
,
Tommaselli
GA
,
Nappi
C

1998
A clinical trial of the effects of tibolone administered with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata.
Fertil Steril
70
:
111
118
46

Palomba
S
,
Affinito
P
,
Di Carlo
C
,
Bifulco
G
,
Nappi
C

1999
Long-term administration of tibolone plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for the treatment of uterine leiomyomas: effectiveness and effects on vasomotor symptoms, bone mass, and lipid profiles.
Fertil Steril
72
:
889
895
47

Friedewald
WT
,
Levy
RI
,
Fredrickson
DS

1972
Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge.
Clin Chem
18
:
499
502
48

Yarali
H
,
Yildirir
A
,
Aybar
F
,
Kabakci
G
,
Bukulmez
O
,
Akgul
E
,
Oto
A

2001
Diastolic dysfunction and increased serum homocysteine concentrations may contribute to increased cardiovascular risk in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Fertil Steril
76
:
511
516
49

Tiras
MB
,
Yalcin
R
,
Noyan
V
,
Maral
I
,
Yildirim
M
,
Dortlemez
O
,
Daya
S

1999
Alterations in cardiac flow parameters in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome.
Hum Reprod
14
:
1949
1952
50

Amowitz
LL
,
Sobel
BE

1999
Cardiovascular consequences of polycystic ovary syndrome.
Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am
28
:
439
458
51

Arslanian
SA
,
Lewy
VD
,
Danadian
K

2001
Glucose intolerance in obese adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome: roles of insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction and risk of cardiovascular disease.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
86
:
66
71
52

Legro
RS

2003
Polycystic ovary syndrome and cardiovascular disease: a premature association?
Endocr Rev
24
:
302
312
53

Wild
RA

1995
Obesity, lipids, cardiovascular risk and androgen excess.
Am J Med
98
:
27
S–32S
54

De Simone
G
,
Daniels
SR
,
Devereux
RB
,
Meyer
RA
,
Roman
MJ
,
de Divitiis
O
,
Alderman
MH

1992
Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight.
J Am Coll Cardiol
20
:
1251
1260
55

McFarlane
SI
,
Banerji
M
,
Sowers
JR

2001
Insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
86
:
713
718
56

Vetta
F
,
Cicconetti
P
,
Ronzoni
S
,
Rizzo
V
,
Palleschi
L
,
Canarile
G
,
Lupattelli
MR
,
Migliori
M
,
Morelli
S
,
Marigliano
V

1998
Hyperinsulinaemia, regional adipose tissue distribution and left ventricular mass in normotensive, elderly, obese subjects.
Eur Heart J
19
:
326
331
57

Pyorala
K

1979
Relationship of glucose tolerance and plasma insulin to the incidence of coronary heart disease: results from two population studies in Finland.
Diabetes Care
2
:
131
141
58

Welborn
TA
,
Wearne
K

1979
Coronary heart disease incidence and cardiovascular mortality in Busselton with reference to glucose and insulin concentrations.
Diabetes Care
2
:
154
160
59

Ducimentiere
P
,
Eschwege
E
,
Papoz
L
,
Richard
JL
,
Claude
JR
,
Rosselin
G

1980
Relationship of plasma insulin level to the incidence of myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease.
Diabetologia
19
:
205
210
60

Fontbonne
A
,
Charles
MA
,
Thibult
N
,
Richard
JL
,
Claude
JR
,
Warnet
JM
,
Rosselin
GE
,
Eschwége
E

1991
Hyperinsulinemia as a predictor of coronary heart disease mortality in a healthy population: the Paris Prospective Study, 15 year follow-up.
Diabetologia
34
:
356
361
61

Reaven
GM

1988
Banting lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease.
Diabetes
37
:
1595
1607
62

Zimmermann
S
,
Phillips
RA
,
Dunaif
A
,
Finegood
DT
,
Wilkenfeld
C
,
Ardeljan
M
,
Gorlin
R
,
Krakoff
LR

1992
Polycystic ovary syndrome: lack of hypertension despite profound insulin resistance.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
75
:
508
513
63

Prelevic
GM
,
Beljic
T
,
Balint-Peric
L
,
Ginsburg
J

1995
Cardiac flow velocity in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
43
:
677
681
64

Rajkhowa
M
,
Glass
MR
,
Rutherford
AJ
,
Michelmore
K
,
Balen
AH

2000
Polycystic ovary syndrome: a risk factor for cardiovascular disease?
Br J Obstet Gynaecol
107
:
11
18