The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models
- PMID: 16282215
- DOI: 10.1177/0272989X05282643
The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models
Abstract
This article shows that the interpretation of the random-effects models used in meta-analysis to summarize heterogeneous treatment effects can have a marked effect on the results from decision models. Sources of variation in meta-analysis include the following: random variation in outcome definition (amounting to a form of measurement error), variation between the patient groups in different trials, variation between protocols, and variation in the way a given protocol is implemented. Each of these alternatives leads to a different model for how the heterogeneity in the effect sizes previously observed might relate to the effect size(s) in a future implementation. Furthermore, these alternative models require different computations and, when the net benefits are nonlinear in the efficacy parameters, result in different expected net benefits. The authors' analysis suggests that the mean treatment effect from a random-effects meta-analysis will only seldom be an appropriate representation of the efficacy expected in a future implementation. Instead, modelers should consider either the predictive distribution of a future treatment effect, or they should assume that the future implementation will result in a distribution of treatment effects. A worked example, in a probabilistic, Bayesian posterior framework, is used to illustrate the alternative computations and to show how parameter uncertainty can be combined with variation between individuals and heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
Comment in
-
Correction: interpretation of random effects meta-analysis in decision models.Med Decis Making. 2007 Mar-Apr;27(2):212-4. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07300428. Med Decis Making. 2007. PMID: 17409370 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Use of a random effects meta-analysis in the design and analysis of a new clinical trial.Stat Med. 2018 Dec 30;37(30):4665-4679. doi: 10.1002/sim.7948. Epub 2018 Sep 6. Stat Med. 2018. PMID: 30187505 Free PMC article.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Correction: interpretation of random effects meta-analysis in decision models.Med Decis Making. 2007 Mar-Apr;27(2):212-4. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07300428. Med Decis Making. 2007. PMID: 17409370 No abstract available.
-
An evaluation of the feasibility, cost and value of information of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for sepsis (severe sepsis and septic shock): incorporating a systematic review, meta-analysis and value of information analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(7):1-186. doi: 10.3310/hta16070. Health Technol Assess. 2012. PMID: 22361003 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ablation: Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management: Network meta-analysis J2.London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2021 Apr. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2021 Apr. PMID: 34165931 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Treatment-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2024 May 17;14:1391724. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1391724. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38826783 Free PMC article.
-
Gestational diabetes mellitus and development of intergenerational non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) after delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Apr 29;72:102609. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102609. eCollection 2024 Jun. EClinicalMedicine. 2024. PMID: 38707911 Free PMC article.
-
Association between passing return-to-sport testing and re-injury risk in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PeerJ. 2024 Apr 29;12:e17279. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17279. eCollection 2024. PeerJ. 2024. PMID: 38699196 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of needle-stick injury in Iranian nurses: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.BMC Nurs. 2024 Apr 24;23(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01914-z. BMC Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38658903 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic values of contrast-enhanced MRI and contrast-enhanced CT for evaluating the response of hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolisation: a meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 5;14(4):e070364. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070364. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38580362 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources