Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2011 Dec 31;13(4):e126.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923.

CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions

Gunther Eysenbach  1 ; CONSORT-EHEALTH Group
Collaborators, Affiliations
Editorial

CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions

Gunther Eysenbach et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Web-based and mobile health interventions (also called "Internet interventions" or "ehealth/mhealth interventions") are tools or treatments, typically behaviorally based, that are operationalized and transformed for delivery via the Internet or mobile platforms. These include electronic tools for patients, informal caregivers, healthy consumers, and health care providers. The "Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials" (CONSORT) was developed to improve the suboptimal reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While broadly the CONSORT statement can be applied to provide guidance on how ehealth and mhealth trials should be reported, RCTs of web-based interventions pose very specific issues and challenges, in particular related to reporting sufficient details of the intervention to allow replication and theory-building.

Objective: To develop a checklist, dubbed CONSORT-EHEALTH (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials of Electronic and Mobile HEalth Applications and onLine TeleHealth), as an extension of the CONSORT statement that provides guidance for authors of ehealth and mhealth interventions.

Methods: A literature review was conducted, followed by a survey among ehealth experts and a workshop.

Results: An instrument and checklist was constructed as an extension of the CONSORT statement. The instrument has been adopted by the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) and authors of ehealth RCTs are required to submit an electronic checklist explaining how they addressed each subitem.

Conclusions: CONSORT-EHEALTH has the potential to improve reporting and provides a basis for evaluating the validity and applicability of ehealth trials. Subitems describing how the intervention should be reported can also be used for non-RCT evaluation reports. As part of the development process, an evaluation component is essential, therefore feedback from authors will be solicited, and a before-after study will evaluate whether reporting has been improved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author is editor and publisher of JMIR.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ritterband LM, Andersson G, Christensen HM, Carlbring P, Cuijpers P. Directions for the International Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ISRII) J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e23. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e23. http://www.jmir.org/2006/3/e23/v8i3e23 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Nov 10;6(4):e40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.4.e40. http://www.jmir.org/2004/4/e40/v6e40 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J, Lowe P, Thorogood M. Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e10. http://www.jmir.org/2006/2/e10/v8i2e10 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eysenbach G. Issues in evaluating health websites in an Internet-based randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2002 Dec;4(3):E17. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.3.e17. http://www.jmir.org/2002/3/e17/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bessell TL, McDonald S, Silagy CA, Anderson JN, Hiller JE, Sansom LN. Do Internet interventions for consumers cause more harm than good? A systematic review. Health Expect. 2002 Mar;5(1):28–37.156 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

-