Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct 27;6(33):34158-77.
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5779.

Copper activates HIF-1α/GPER/VEGF signalling in cancer cells

Damiano Cosimo Rigiracciolo  1 , Andrea Scarpelli  1 , Rosamaria Lappano  1 , Assunta Pisano  1 , Maria Francesca Santolla  1 , Paola De Marco  1 , Francesca Cirillo  1 , Anna Rita Cappello  1 , Vincenza Dolce  1 , Antonino Belfiore  2 , Marcello Maggiolini  1 , Ernestina Marianna De Francesco  1
Affiliations

Copper activates HIF-1α/GPER/VEGF signalling in cancer cells

Damiano Cosimo Rigiracciolo et al. Oncotarget. .

Abstract

Copper promotes tumor angiogenesis, nevertheless the mechanisms involved remain to be fully understood. We have recently demonstrated that the G-protein estrogen receptor (GPER) cooperates with hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) toward the regulation of the pro-angiogenic factor VEGF. Here, we show that copper sulfate (CuSO4) induces the expression of HIF-1α as well as GPER and VEGF in breast and hepatic cancer cells through the activation of the EGFR/ERK/c-fos transduction pathway. Worthy, the copper chelating agent TEPA and the ROS scavenger NAC prevented the aforementioned stimulatory effects. We also ascertained that HIF-1α and GPER are required for the transcriptional activation of VEGF induced by CuSO4. In addition, in human endothelial cells, the conditioned medium from breast cancer cells treated with CuSO4 promoted cell migration and tube formation through HIF-1α and GPER. The present results provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms involved by copper in triggering angiogenesis and tumor progression. Our data broaden the therapeutic potential of copper chelating agents against tumor angiogenesis and progression.

Keywords: GPER; HIF-1α; Pathology Section; VEGF; angiogenesis; cancer; copper.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. CuSO4 induces the mRNA expression of HIF-1α and VEGF
mRNA expression of HIF-1α A. and VEGF B. in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells treated with increasing concentrations of CuSO4 for 8 hours, as evaluated by real-time PCR. CuSO4 (200 μM) induces the mRNA expression of HIF-1α C. and VEGF D. in a time-dependent manner. In SkBr3 and HepG2 cells treated with 200 μM CuSO4 for 8 hours, the mRNA induction of HIF-1α E. and VEGF F. is abrogated in the presence of the copper chelating agent TEPA (50 μM) and the ROS scavenger NAC (300 μM). Values are normalized to the 18S expression and shown as fold changes of the mRNA expression induced by CuSO4 compared to cells treated with vehicle (−). G. The transactivation of a VEGF promoter plasmid (pVEGF) observed in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells treated with 200 μM CuSO4 for 12 hours is prevented by TEPA (50 μM) and NAC (300 μM). The luciferase activities were normalized to the internal transfection control and values of cells receiving vehicle (−) were set as 1-fold induction upon which the activities induced by CuSO4 treatment were calculated. Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. (○), (●) p < 0.05 for cells receiving vehicle (−) versus CuSO4 treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2. CuSO4 rescues the inhibitory effects of TEPA on CoCl2-induced transcription of HIF-1α and VEGF
In SkBr3 and HepG2 cells, the up-regulation of HIF-1α A. and VEGF B. mRNA expression induced upon CoCl2 treatment (100 μM for 8 hours) is no longer evident in the presence of TEPA (50 μM) but rescued using CoCl2 (100 μM for 8 hours) in combination with 200 μM CuSO4, as determined by real-time PCR. Values are normalized to the 18S expression and shown as fold changes of mRNA expression induced by treatments respect to cells treated with vehicle (−). C. The transactivation of a VEGF promoter plasmid (pVEGF) observed in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells treated with 100 μM CoCl2 for 12 hours is prevented by TEPA (50 μM) and rescued using CoCl2 (100 μM for 12 hours) in combination with 200 μM CuSO4. The luciferase activities were normalized to the internal transfection control and values of cells receiving vehicle (−) were set as 1-fold induction upon which the activities induced by CoCl2 treatment were calculated. Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. (○), (●) p < 0.05 for cells receiving vehicle (−) versus treatments.
Figure 3
Figure 3. CuSO4 induces the mRNA expression of GPER
mRNA expression of GPER in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells treated with increasing concentrations of CuSO4 for 8 hours, as evaluated by real-time PCR A. CuSO4 (200 μM) induces the mRNA expression of GPER in a time-dependent manner B. The increase in GPER mRNA observed treating SkBr3 and HepG2 cells for 8 hours with 200 μM CuSO4 is abrogated in the presence of TEPA (50 μM) and NAC (300 μM) C. The transactivation of a GPER promoter plasmid (pGPER) observed in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells treated with 200 μM CuSO4 for 12 hours is prevented by TEPA (50 μM) and NAC (300 μM) D. The mRNA induction of GPER observed in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells treated with 100 μM CoCl2 for 8 hours is abrogated in the presence of TEPA (50 μM) and rescued using CoCl2 (100 μM for 8 hours) in combination with 200 μM CuSO4, as determined by real-time PCR E. The transactivation of a GPER promoter plasmid (pGPER) observed in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells treated with 100 μM CoCl2 for 12 hours is prevented by TEPA (50 μM) and rescued using CoCl2 (100 μM for 12 hours) in combination with 200 μM CuSO4 F. Dose-response increase of c-fos mRNA expression in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells treated with CuSO4 for 8 hours, as evaluated by real-time PCR G. CuSO4 (200 μM) induces the mRNA expression of c-fos in a time-dependent manner H. The mRNA increase of c-fos observed treating SkBr3 and HepG2 cells for 8 hours with 200 μM CuSO4 is abrogated in the presence of TEPA (50 μM) and NAC (300 μM) I. The transactivation of c-fos (fos-luc) and AP-1 (AP-1luc) reporter plasmids observed in SkBr3 cells treated with 200 μM CuSO4 for 12 hours is prevented by TEPA (50 μM) and NAC (300 μM) J. In transfection assays, the luciferase activities were normalized to the internal transfection control and values of cells receiving vehicle (−) were set as 1-fold induction upon which the activities induced by treatments were calculated. In RNA experiments, values are normalized to the 18S expression and shown as fold changes of mRNA expression induced by treatments compared to cells treated with vehicle (−). Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. (○), (●) p < 0.05 for cells receiving vehicle (−) versus treatments.
Figure 4
Figure 4. CuSO4 induces the protein expression of c-fos, HIF-1α and GPER
Up-regulation of c-fos, HIF-1α and GPER protein expression in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells treated with 200 μM CuSO4 for 8 hours A., B. The induction of c-fos, HIF-1α and GPER protein expression observed upon treatment with 200 μM CuSO4 for 8 hours is abolished in the presence of TEPA (50 μM) and NAC (300 μM) C., D. Results shown are representative of three independent experiments. Side panels show densitometric analysis of the blots normalized to β-actin. (▩), (●), (○), p < 0.05 for cells receiving vehicle (−) versus CuSO4 treatment.
Figure 5
Figure 5. CuSO4 induces EGFR and ERK activation
The exposure to 200 μM CuSO4 induces EGFR (Tyr 1173) and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells A., B. The activation of EGFR and ERK1/2 observed in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells treated with 200 μM CuSO4 for 30 min is abrogated in the presence of the EGFR inhibitor AG1478 (AG, 10 μM) and the MEK inhibitor PD98059 (PD, 10 μM) C., D. as well as TEPA (50 μM) and NAC (300 μM) E., F. Side panels show densitometric analysis of the blots normalized to EGFR or ERK2. Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (○), (●) p < 0.05 for cells receiving vehicle (−) versus CuSO4 treatment.
Figure 6
Figure 6. The EGFR/ERK transduction pathway is involved in the stimulatory responses induced by CuSO4
The mRNA increase of c-fos A., HIF-1α B., GPER C. and VEGF D. observed in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells upon treatment with 200 μM CuSO4 for 8 hours is prevented by AG (10 μM) and PD (10 μM), as evaluated by real-time PCR. Values are normalized to the 18S expression and shown as fold changes of mRNA expression induced by CuSO4 compared to cells treated with vehicle (−). The transactivation of c-fos, AP-1, GPER and VEGF reporter plasmids induced in SkBr3 cells upon treatment with 200 μM CuSO4 for 12 hours is abolished using AG (10 μM) and PD (10 μM) E., F. The luciferase activities were normalized to the internal transfection control and values of cells receiving vehicle (−) were set as 1-fold induction upon which the activities induced by CuSO4 treatment were calculated. Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. The up-regulation of c-fos, HIF-1α and GPER protein expression observed in SkBr3 G. and HepG2 H. cells treated with 200 μM CuSO4 for 8 hours is abolished in the presence of AG (10 μM) and PD (10 μM) G., H. Results shown are representative of three independent experiments. Side panels show densitometric analysis of the blots normalized to β-actin. (formula image), (●), (○), p < 0.05 for cells receiving vehicle (−) versus CuSO4 treatment.
Figure 7
Figure 7. CuSO4 induces VEGF protein expression as evaluated by immunofluorescence assay
SkBr3 cells were treated for 12 hours with vehicle (panels 1-3), 200 μM CuSO4 alone (panels 4-6) or in combination with TEPA (50 μM) (panels 7-9), NAC (300 μM) (panels 10-12), AG (10 μM) (panels 13-15) and PD (10 μM) (panels 16-18). VEGF accumulation is shown by the green signal, nuclei were stained by DAPI (blue signal). The slides were imaged on the Cytation 3 Cell Imaging Multimode Reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT). Images shown are representative of three independent experiments. Fluorescence intensities for the green channel were quantified in 10 random fields for each condition and results are expressed as fold change of relative fluorescence units (RFU) over the vehicle-treated cells (as indicated in the lower panel). Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (○) p < 0.05 for cells receiving vehicle (−) versus CuSO4 treatment.
Figure 8
Figure 8. c-fos is involved in the up-regulation of HIF-1α, GPER and VEGF induced by CuSO4
Evaluation of HIF-1α and GPER protein expression in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells transfected for 24 hours with a vector or a plasmid encoding for a dominant negative form of c-fos (DN/c-fos) and then treated with 200 μM CuSO4 for 8 hours (A., B.). Side panels show densitometric analysis of the blots normalized to β-actin. Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Evaluation of VEGF protein expression by immunofluorescence assay in SkBr3 cells transfected for 24 hours with a vector (panels 1-6) or a plasmid encoding for a dominant negative form of c-fos (DN/c-fos) (panels 7-12) and then treated with vehicle or 200 μM CuSO4 for 12 hours, as indicated. VEGF accumulation is shown by the green signal, nuclei were stained by DAPI (blue signal). The slides were imaged on the Cytation 3 Cell Imaging Multimode Reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT). Images shown are representative of three independent experiments C. Fluorescence intensities for the green channel were quantified in 10 random fields for each condition and results are expressed as fold change of relative fluorescence units (RFU) over the vehicle-treated cells D. Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (○), (●) p < 0.05 for cells receiving vehicle (−) versus CuSO4 treatment.
Figure 9
Figure 9. HIF-1α is involved in the up-regulation of GPER and VEGF induced by CuSO4
Evaluation of GPER protein expression in SkBr3 and HepG2 cells transfected with shRNA or shHIF-1α for 24 hours and then treated with 200 μM CuSO4 for 8 hours A., C. Side panels show densitometric analysis of the blots normalized to β-actin. Efficacy of HIF-1α silencing in SkBr3 and HepG2. Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments B., D. E.-H. The transactivation of the GPER (pGPER) E. and VEGF (pVEGF) G. promoter plasmids observed in SkBr3 cells treated with 200 μM CuSO4 for 12 hours is abrogated silencing the expression of HIF-1α. (F, H) Efficacy of HIF-1α silencing. The luciferase activities were normalized to the internal transfection control and values of cells receiving vehicle were set as 1-fold induction, upon which the activities induced by treatments were calculated. Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. I. Evaluation of VEGF protein expression by immunofluorescence assay in SkBr3 cells transfected for 24 hours with shRNA (panels 1-6) or shHIF-1α (panels 7-12) and treated with 200 μM CuSO4 for 12 hours, as indicated. VEGF accumulation is shown by the green signal, nuclei were stained by DAPI (blue signal). The slides were imaged on the Cytation 3 Cell Imaging Multimode Reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT). Images shown are representative of three independent experiments. J. Fluorescence intensities for the green channel were quantified in 10 random fields for each condition and results are expressed as fold change of relative fluorescence units (RFU) over the vehicle-treated cells. Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. K. Efficacy of HIF-1α silencing. (○) p < 0.05 for cells receiving vehicle versus CuSO4 treatment.
Figure 10
Figure 10. GPER is involved in VEGF protein increase induced by CuSO4
Evaluation of VEGF protein expression by immunofluorescence assay in SkBr3 cells transfected for 24 hours with shRNA (panels 1-6) or shGPER (panels 7-12) and treated with 200 μM CuSO4 for 12 hours, as indicated. VEGF accumulation is evidenced by the green signal, nuclei were stained by DAPI (blue signal). The slides were imaged on the Cytation 3 Cell Imaging Multimode Reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT). Images shown are representative of three independent experiments A. Fluorescence intensities for the green channel were quantified in 10 random fields for each condition and results are expressed as fold change of relative fluorescence units (RFU) over the vehicle-treated cells B. Values are mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Efficacy of GPER silencing C. The transactivation of the VEGF (pVEGF) promoter plasmid observed in SkBr3 cells treated with 200 μM CuSO4 for 12 hours is abrogated silencing the expression of GPER D. The luciferase activities were normalized to the internal transfection control and values of cells receiving vehicle were set as 1-fold induction, upon which the activities induced by treatments were calculated. Efficacy of GPER silencing E. Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. (○) p < 0.05 for cells receiving vehicle (−) versus CuSO4 treatment.
Figure 11
Figure 11. HIF-1α and GPER contribute to the endothelial tube formation triggered by CuSO4
Tube formation in HUVECs cultured for 2 hours in medium collected from SkBr3 cells which were transfected for 24 hours with shRNA A., shHIF-1α B. or shGPER C. and then treated for 18 hours with vehicle or 200 μM CuSO4, as indicated. C. In HUVECs cultured in conditioned medium from SkBr3 cells that were transfected with shGPER and treated with 200 μM CuSO4, tube formation is rescued adding 10 ng/mL VEGF for 2 hours. Data are representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Quantification of the number of tubes D., total tube length E. and number of branching points F. observed in HUVECs, as indicated. Data are representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. (○) p < 0.05 for cells receiving medium from SkBr3 cells treated with vehicle versus cells receiving medium from SkBr3 cells treated with CuSO4. Efficacy of HIF-1α G. and GPER H. silencing in SkBr3 cells.
Figure 12
Figure 12. HIF-1α and GPER contribute to the endothelial cell migration induced by CuSO4
Cell migration in HUVECs cultured for 24 hours in medium collected from SkBr3 cells which were transfected for 24 hours with control shRNA A., shHIF-1α B. or shGPER C. and then treated for 18 hours with vehicle or 200 μM CuSO4, as indicated. C. In HUVECs cultured in medium from SkBr3 cells which were transfected with shGPER and treated with 200 μM CuSO4, cell migration is rescued adding 10 ng/mL VEGF for 36 hours. Data are representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Efficacy of HIF-1α D. and GPER E. silencing in SkBr3 cells.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Kim BE, Nevitt T, Thiele DJ. Mechanisms for copper acquisition, distribution and regulation. Nat ChemBiol. 2008;3:176–185. - PubMed
    1. Georgopoulos PG, Roy A, Yonone-Lioy MJ, Opiekun RE, Lioy PJ. Environmental copper: its dynamics and human exposure issues. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2001;4:341–394. - PubMed
    1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Atlanta, GA: US Public Health Service; 1990. Toxicological Profile for Copper; p. p43.
    1. Rocha GH, Lini RS, Barbosa F Jr. Batista BL, de Oliveira Souza VC, Nerilo SB, Bando E, Mossini SA, Nishiyama P. Exposure to heavy metals due to pesticide use by vineyard farmers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015;88:875–80. - PubMed
    1. Antoniades V, Sioga A, Dietrich EM, Meditskou S, Ekonomou L, Antoniades K. Is copper chelation an effective anti-angiogenic strategy for cancer treatment? Med Hypotheses. 2013;6:1159–1163. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

-