Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;74(3):785-794.
doi: 10.1111/biom.12817. Epub 2017 Nov 15.

Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis

Lifeng Lin  1 , Haitao Chu  1
Affiliations

Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis

Lifeng Lin et al. Biometrics. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Publication bias is a serious problem in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which can affect the validity and generalization of conclusions. Currently, approaches to dealing with publication bias can be distinguished into two classes: selection models and funnel-plot-based methods. Selection models use weight functions to adjust the overall effect size estimate and are usually employed as sensitivity analyses to assess the potential impact of publication bias. Funnel-plot-based methods include visual examination of a funnel plot, regression and rank tests, and the nonparametric trim and fill method. Although these approaches have been widely used in applications, measures for quantifying publication bias are seldom studied in the literature. Such measures can be used as a characteristic of a meta-analysis; also, they permit comparisons of publication biases between different meta-analyses. Egger's regression intercept may be considered as a candidate measure, but it lacks an intuitive interpretation. This article introduces a new measure, the skewness of the standardized deviates, to quantify publication bias. This measure describes the asymmetry of the collected studies' distribution. In addition, a new test for publication bias is derived based on the skewness. Large sample properties of the new measure are studied, and its performance is illustrated using simulations and three case studies.

Keywords: Heterogeneity; Meta-analysis; Publication bias; Skewness; Standardized deviate; Statistical power.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The funnel plot of a simulated meta-analysis containing 60 studies. The 10 studies with the most negative effect sizes were suppressed due to publication bias, and the remaining 50 studies were “published”.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Contour-enhanced funnel plots of the three actual meta-analyses. The vertical and diagonal dashed lines represent the overall estimated effect size and its 95% confidence limits, respectively, based on the fixed-effect model. The shaded regions represent different significance levels for the effect size.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Altman DG. Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? JAMA. 2002;287:2765–2767. - PubMed
    1. Antille A, Kersting G, Zucchini W. Testing symmetry. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1982;77:639–646.
    1. Begg CB, Berlin JA. Publication bias: a problem in interpreting medical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 1988;151:419–463.
    1. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–1101. - PubMed
    1. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods. 2010;1:97–111. - PubMed

Publication types

-