skip to main content
10.1145/3442442.3452315acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Affect Classification in Tweets using Multitask Deep Neural Networks

Published: 03 June 2021 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    We propose a multitask deep neural network for detecting affect-retweet pairs for Twitter tweets. Each task given to our network jointly learns a given affect, e.g. hate, sarcasm etc., along with learning retweeting behaviour as an auxiliary task, from a given tweet corpus. On test data, this model allows us to predict retweet behaviour in the absence of any further meta-data, along with identifying affect. This allows us also to predict whether a tweet with affect would go viral or not. Our model delivers F1-scores of 0.93 and 0.91 for hate and sarcasm detection respectively, and predicts retweets with the accuracy of 71% and 60% respectively, delivering state-of-the-art performance on benchmark data.

    References

    [1]
    Silvio Amir, Byron C Wallace, Hao Lyu, and Paula Carvalho Mário J Silva. 2016. Modelling context with user embeddings for sarcasm detection in social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.00976(2016).
    [2]
    Pinkesh Badjatiya, Shashank Gupta, Manish Gupta, and Vasudeva Varma. 2017. Deep learning for hate speech detection in tweets. In WWW. 759–760.
    [3]
    David Bamman and Noah A Smith. 2015. Contextualized sarcasm detection on twitter. In ICWSM.
    [4]
    Piotr Bojanowski, Edouard Grave, Armand Joulin, and Tomas Mikolov. 2017. Enriching word vectors with subword information. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 5 (2017), 135–146.
    [5]
    Dmitry Davidov, Oren Tsur, and Ari Rappoport. 2010. Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in twitter and amazon. In CoNLL. 107–116.
    [6]
    Nemanja Djuric, Jing Zhou, Robin Morris, Mihajlo Grbovic, Vladan Radosavljevic, and Narayan Bhamidipati. 2015. Hate speech detection with comment embeddings. In WWW. 29–30.
    [7]
    Syeda Nadia Firdaus, Chen Ding, and Alireza Sadeghian. 2016. Retweet prediction considering user’s difference as an author and retweeter. In ASONAM. IEEE, 852–859.
    [8]
    Syeda Nadia Firdaus, Chen Ding, and Alireza Sadeghian. 2019. Topic specific emotion detection for retweet prediction. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 10, 8(2019), 2071–2083.
    [9]
    Antigoni Maria Founta, Despoina Chatzakou, Nicolas Kourtellis, Jeremy Blackburn, Athena Vakali, and Ilias Leontiadis. 2019. A unified deep learning architecture for abuse detection. In ACM WebSci. 105–114.
    [10]
    Antigoni-Maria Founta, Constantinos Djouvas, Despoina Chatzakou, Ilias Leontiadis, Jeremy Blackburn, Gianluca Stringhini, Athena Vakali, Michael Sirivianos, and Nicolas Kourtellis. 2018. Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behavior. In ICWSM. AAAI Press.
    [11]
    Roberto González-Ibánez, Smaranda Muresan, and Nina Wacholder. 2011. Identifying sarcasm in Twitter: a closer look. In Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Short Papers-Volume 2. 581–586.
    [12]
    Devamanyu Hazarika, Soujanya Poria, Sruthi Gorantla, Erik Cambria, Roger Zimmermann, and Rada Mihalcea. 2018. Cascade: Contextual sarcasm detection in online discussion forums. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.06413(2018).
    [13]
    Liangjie Hong, Aziz Doumith, and Brian D. Davison. [n.d.]. Personalized Retweet Prediction in Twitter.
    [14]
    Eleanna Kafeza, Andreas Kanavos, Christos Makris, and Pantelis Vikatos. 2014. Predicting information diffusion patterns in twitter. In IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations. Springer, 79–89.
    [15]
    Roger J Kreuz. 2018. The use of verbal irony: Cues and constraints. In Metaphor. Psychology Press, 23–38.
    [16]
    Akshi Kumar, Saurabh Raj Sangwan, Anshika Arora, Anand Nayyar, Mohamed Abdel-Basset, 2019. Sarcasm detection using soft attention-based bidirectional long short-term memory model with convolution network. IEEE Access 7(2019), 23319–23328.
    [17]
    Paolo Nesi, Gianni Pantaleo, Irene Paoli, and Imad Zaza. 2018. Assessing the reTweet proneness of tweets: predictive models for retweeting. Multimedia Tools and Applications 77, 20 (2018), 26371–26396.
    [18]
    Ashwin Rajadesingan, Reza Zafarani, and Huan Liu. 2015. Sarcasm detection on twitter: A behavioral modeling approach. In WSDM. 97–106.
    [19]
    Antonio Reyes, Paolo Rosso, and Davide Buscaldi. 2012. From humor recognition to irony detection: The figurative language of social media. Data & Knowledge Engineering 74 (2012), 1–12.
    [20]
    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 5998–6008.
    [21]
    William Warner and Julia Hirschberg. 2012. Detecting hate speech on the world wide web. In Second workshop on language in social media. Association for Computational Linguistics, 19–26.
    [22]
    Jing Zhang, Jie Tang, Juanzi Li, Yang Liu, and Chunxiao Xing. 2015. Who influenced you? predicting retweet via social influence locality. ACM TKDD 9, 3 (2015), 1–26.
    [23]
    Meishan Zhang, Yue Zhang, and Guohong Fu. 2016. Tweet sarcasm detection using deep neural network. In COLING. 2449–2460.
    1. Affect Classification in Tweets using Multitask Deep Neural Networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WWW '21: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021
      April 2021
      726 pages
      ISBN:9781450383134
      DOI:10.1145/3442442
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 03 June 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Twitter
      2. affect detection
      3. hate
      4. multitask
      5. sarcasm
      6. social network

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      WWW '21
      Sponsor:
      WWW '21: The Web Conference 2021
      April 19 - 23, 2021
      Ljubljana, Slovenia

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 98
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media

      -