Abstract
Key message
Bandwagons come in waves. A plant breeder, just like a surfer, needs to carefully choose which waves to be on.
Abstract
A bandwagon is an idea, activity, or cause that becomes increasingly fashionable as more and more people adopt it. In a 1991 article entitled Bandwagons I Have Known, Professor N. W. Simmonds described several bandwagons that he encountered in his career, beginning with induced polyploidy and mutation breeding and ending with the then-new field of biotechnology. This article reviews and speculates about post-1990 bandwagons in plant improvement, including transgenic cultivars, quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping, association mapping, genomewide (or genomic) selection, phenomics, envirotyping, and genome editing. The life cycle of a bandwagon includes an excitement phase of hype and funding; a realization phase when the initial hype is either tempered or the initial expectations are found to have been too low; and a reality phase when the useful aspects of a bandwagon become part of mainstream thinking and practice, or when an unsuccessful bandwagon is largely abandoned. During the realization phase, a new bandwagon that draws our attention and gives us renewed optimism typically arises. The most popular bandwagons, such as QTL mapping, are those for which the needed experimental resources are accessible, the required technical knowledge and skills can be easily learned, and the outputs can almost always be reported. The favorite bandwagon of any plant breeder has, in one way or another, resulted from Mendel’s seminal discoveries 150 years ago. Our community of plant breeders needs to be continually diligent in welcoming new bandwagons, but also in hopping off from those that do not prove useful.
![](https://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00122-016-2772-5/MediaObjects/122_2016_2772_Fig1_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht T, Wimmer V, Auinger H-J, Erbe M, Knaak C, Ouzunova M, Simianer H, Schön C-C (2011) Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize. Theor Appl Genet 123:339–350
Anderson JA, Chao S, Liu S (2008) Molecular breeding using a major QTL for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Crop Sci 47:S112–S119
Asoro FG, Newell MA, Beavis WD, Scott MP, Jannink JL (2011) Accuracy and training population design for genomic selection on quantitative traits in elite North American oats. Plant Genome 4:132–144
Asoro FG, Newell MA, Beavis WD, Scott MP, Tinker NA, Jannink J-L (2013) Comparison of genomic, marker-assisted, and pedigree-BLUP selection methods to increase ß-glucan concentration in elite oat germplasm. Crop Sci 53:1894–1906
Beavis WD (1994) The power and deceit of QTL experiments: lessons from comparative QTL studies, pp 250–266. In: Proc Corn Sorghum Ind Res Conf, 7–8 Dec 1994, Chicago, Illinois. Am Seed Trade Assoc, Washington, DC
Beavis WD, Grant D, Albertsen M, Fincher R (1991) Quantitative trait loci for plant height in four maize populations and their associations with qualitative genetic loci. Theor Appl Genet 83:141–145
Beckman JS, Soller M (1986) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms and genetic improvement of agricultural species. Euphytica 35:111–124
Bernardo R (2008) Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: learning from the last 20 years. Crop Sci 48:1649–1664
Bernardo R (2013) Genomewide markers for controlling background variation in association mapping. Plant Genome. doi:10.3835/plantgenome2012.11.0028
Bernardo R, Yu J (2007) Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci 47:1082–1090
Beyene Y, Semagn K, Mugo S, Tarekegne A, Babu R, Meisel B, Sehabiague P, Makumbi D, Magorokosho C, Oikeh S, Gakunga J, Vargas M, Olsen M, Prasanna BM, Banziger M, Crossa J (2015) Genetic gains in grain yield through genomic selection in eight bi-parental maize populations under drought stress. Crop Sci 55:154–163
Brannigan A, Wanner RA, White JM (1981) The phenomenon of multiple discoveries and the re-publication of Mendel’s work in 1900. Phil Social Sci 11:263–276
Broertjes C (1966) Mutation breeding of chrysanthemums. Euphytica 15:156–162
Combs E, Bernardo R (2013) Genomewide selection to introgress semidwarf corn germplasm into U.S. Corn Belt inbreds. Crop Sci 53:1427–1436
Concibido VC, Diers BW, Arelli PR (2004) A decade of QTL mapping for cyst nematode resistance in soybean. Crop Sci 44:1121–1131
Cooper M, Messina CD, Podlich D, Totir LR, Baumgarten A, Hausmann NJ, Wright D, Graham G (2014) Predicting the future of plant breeding: complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction. Crop Pasture Sci 65:311–336
Corcos AF, Monaghan FV (1990) Mendel’s work and its rediscovery: a new perspective. Crit Rev Plant Sci 9:197–212
Crabb AR (1947) The hybrid-corn makers: prophets of plenty. Rutgers Univ Press, New Brunswick
Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA (2008) Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS One 3:e3395. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003395
Edwards MD, Helentjaris T, Wright S, Stuber CW (1992) Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. 4. Analysis based on genome saturation with isozyme and restriction fragment length polymorphism markers. Theor Appl Genet 83:765–774
Furbank RT, Tester M (2011) Phenomics—technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends Plant Sci 16:635–644
Guo Z, Tucker D, Lu J, Kishore V, Gay G (2012) Evaluation of genome-wide selection efficiency in maize nested association mapping populations. Theor Appl Genet 124:261–275
Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1981) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA
Heffner EL, Jannink J-L, Sorrells ME (2011) Genomic selection accuracy using multifamily prediction models in a wheat breeding program. Plant Genome 4:65–75
Horner TA, Dively GP, Herbert DA (2003) Development, survival and fitness performance of Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in MON810 Bt field corn. J Econ Entomol 96:914–924
James C (2007) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM Crops: 2007. ISAAA Brief No. 37. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Ithaca, New York
James C (2014) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM Crops: 2014. ISAAA Brief No. 49. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Ithaca, New York
Lande R, Thompson EA (1990) Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124:743–756
Lian L, Jacobson A, Zhong S, Bernardo R (2014) Genomewide prediction accuracy within 969 maize biparental populations. Crop Sci 54:1514–1522
Lorenzana RE, Bernardo R (2009) Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations. Theor Appl Genet 120:151–161
Massman JM, Jung H-JG, Bernardo R (2013) Genomewide selection versus marker-assisted recurrent selection to improve grain yield and stover-quality traits for cellulosic ethanol in maize. Crop Sci 53:58–66
Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819–1829
Monaghan F, Corcos A (1986) Tschermak: a non-discoverer of Mendelism. I. An historical note. J Hered 77:468–469
Moore R (2001) The ‘‘rediscovery’’ of Mendel’s work. Bioscene 27:13–24
Parisseaux B, Bernardo R (2004) In silico mapping of quantitative trait loci in maize. Theor Appl Genet 109:508–514
Platt R (1959) Mendel, Darwin and Galton. Med Hist 3:87–99
Reiter RS, Coors JG, Sussman MR, Gabelman WH (1991) Genetic analysis of tolerance to low-phosphorus stress in maize using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Theor Appl Genet 82:561–568
Rutkoski J, Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Bhavani S, Poland J, Jannink J-L, Sorrells ME (2015) Genetic gain from phenotypic and genomic selection for quantitative resistance to stem rust of wheat. Plant Genome. doi:10.3835/plantgenome2014.10.0074
Schaefer CM, Bernardo R (2013) Genomewide association mapping of flowering time, kernel composition, and disease resistance in historical Minnesota maize inbreds. Crop Sci 53:2518–2529
Schulz-Streeck T, Ogutu JO, Karaman Z, Knaak C, Piepho H-P (2012) Genomic selection using multiple populations. Crop Sci 52:2453–2461
Septiningsih EM, Pamplona AM, Sanchez DL, Neeraja CN, Vergara GV, Heuer S, Ismail AM, Mackill DJ (2009) Development of submergence-tolerant rice cultivars: the Sub1 locus and beyond. Ann Bot 103:151–160
Shull GH (1952) Beginnings of the heterosis concept. In: Gowen JW (ed) Heterosis. Iowa State College Press, Ames, pp 14–48
Smith JSC, Hussain T, Jones ES, Graham G, Podlich D, Wall S, Williams M (2008) Use of doubled haploids in maize breeding: implications for intellectual property protection and genetic diversity in hybrid crops. Mol Breed 22:51–59
Stomps J (1954) On the rediscovery of Mendel’s work by Hugo de Vries. J Hered 45:293–294
Stuber CW, Lincoln SE, Wolff DW, Helentjaris T, Lander ES (1992) Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132:823–839
Thompson PH, Baker RZ, Smallwood N (1986) Improving professional development by applying the four-stage career model. Org Dyn 15:49–62
Veldboom LR, Lee M (1994) Molecular-marker-facilitated studies of morphological traits in maize. II: determination of QTLs for grain yield and yield components. Theor Appl Genet 89:451–458
Wang M, Yan J, Zhao J, Song W, Zhang X, Xiao Y, Zheng Y (2012) Genome-wide association study (GWAS) of resistance to head smut in maize. Plant Sci 196:125–131
Weng J, Xie C, Hao Z, Wang J, Liu C, Li M, Zhang D, Bai L, Zhang S, Li X (2011) Genome-wide association study identifies candidate genes that affect plant height in Chinese elite maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029229
White JW, Andrade-Sanchez P, Gore MA, Bronson KF, Coffelt TA, Conley MM, Feldmann KA, French AN, Heun JT, Hunsaker DJ, Jenks MA, Kimball BA, Roth RL, Strand RJ, Thorp KR, Wall GW, Wang G (2012) Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research. Field Crops Res 133:101–112
Xiong J-S, Ding J, Li Y (2015) Genome-editing technologies and their potential application in horticultural crop breeding. Hort Res 2:15019. doi:10.1038/hortres.2015.19
Xu Y (2016) Envirotyping for deciphering environmental impacts on crop plants. Theor Appl Genet 129:653–673
Yan J, Warburton M, Crouch J (2010) Association mapping for enhancing maize (Zea mays L.) genetic improvement. Crop Sci 51:433–449
Zhang X, Sallam A, Gao L, Kantarski T, Poland J, DeHaan LR, Wyse DL, Anderson JA (2016) Establishment and optimization of genomic selection to accelerate the domestication and improvement of intermediate wheatgrass. Plant Genome. doi:10.3835/plantgenome2015.07.005
Zheng S, Byrne PF, Bai G, Shan X, Reid SD, Haley SD, Seabourn BW (2009) Association analysis reveals effects of wheat glutenin alleles and rye translocations on dough-mixing properties. J Cereal Sci 50:283–290
Zhenhua P, Shouhe J (1995) New Chrysanthemum varieties developed by radiation breeding and micropropagation. Acta Hortic 404:128–130
Zirkle C (1964) Some oddities in the delayed discovery of Mendelism. J Hered 55:65–72
Acknowledgments
I thank Mark Cooper (DuPont Pioneer) for encouraging me to write this article and for suggesting the title; John Snape (John Innes Centre) and Brenda Bautista Perez (CIMMYT) for sending me a copy of the Simmonds Bandwagons article when I could not find my old copy; and Paul Harding of the Tropical Agriculture Association for permission to include the Simmonds article as electronic supplementary material.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by H. Bürstmayr and J. Vollmann.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernardo, R. Bandwagons I, too, have known. Theor Appl Genet 129, 2323–2332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2772-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2772-5