Next Article in Journal
COVID-19 and Pasteurella multocida Pulmonary Coinfection: A Case Series
Previous Article in Journal
Leptospiral Leucine-Rich Repeat Protein-Based Lateral Flow for Assessment of Canine Leptospiral Immunoglobulin G
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
TropicalMed
Volume 7
Issue 12
10.3390/tropicalmed7120428
tropicalmed-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Is Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Stricto in South America? First Molecular Evidence of Its Presence in Colombia

by
Lorys Y. Mancilla-Agrono
1,2,
Lizeth F. Banguero-Micolta
1,2,
Paula A. Ossa-López
2,3,
Héctor E. Ramírez-Chaves
2,4,
Gabriel J. Castaño-Villa
5 and
Fredy A. Rivera-Páez
2,*
1
Programa de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Caldas, Calle 65 No. 26-10, Manizales 170004, Colombia
2
Grupo de Investigación en Genética, Biodiversidad y Manejo de Ecosistemas (GEBIOME), Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Caldas, Calle 65 No. 26-10, Manizales 170004, Colombia
3
Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Caldas, Calle 65 No. 26-10, Manizales 170004, Colombia
4
Centro de Museos, Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad de Caldas, Calle 58 No. 21-50, Manizales 170004, Colombia
5
Grupo de Investigación en Genética, Biodiversidad y Manejo de Ecosistemas (GEBIOME), Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad de Caldas, Calle 65 No. 30-65, Manizales 17004, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7(12), 428; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7120428
Submission received: 8 November 2022 / Revised: 24 November 2022 / Accepted: 6 December 2022 / Published: 11 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Vector-Borne Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The genus Borrelia encompasses spirochetal species that are part of three well-defined groups. Two of these groups contain pathogens that affect humans: the group causing Lyme disease (LDG) and the relapsing fever group (RFG). Lyme disease is caused by Borrelia burgdorferi s.l., which is distributed in the Northern Hemisphere, and relapsing fevers are caused by Borrelia spp., which are found in temperate and tropical countries and are an emerging but neglected pathogens. In some departments of Colombia, there are records of the presence of Borrelia sp. in humans and bats. However, little is known about the impact and circulation of Borrelia spp. in the country, especially in wildlife, which can act as a reservoir and/or amplifying host. In this context, the objective of our research was to detect and identify the Borrelia species present in wild mammals in the departments of Caldas and Risaralda in Colombia. For morphological detection, blood smears and organ imprints were performed, and molecular identification was carried out through a nested PCR directed on the flagellin B (flaB) gene. A total of 105 mammals belonging to three orders (Chiroptera, Didelphimorphia and Rodentia) were analyzed, of which 15.24% (n = 16) were positive for Borrelia. Molecularly, the presence of Borrelia burgdorferi s.s. in lung tissues of Thomasomys aureus and blood of Mus musculus (Rodentia) was detected, with 99.64 and 100% identity, respectively. Borrelia sp. genospecies from a clade branch of a bat-associated LDG sister group were identified in seven individuals of bat species, such as Artibeus lituratus, Carollia brevicauda, Sturnira erythromos, and Glossophaga soricina. Furthermore, two Borrelia genospecies from the RFG in seven individuals of bats (A. lituratus, Artibeus jamaicensis, Platyrrhinus helleri, Mesophylla macconnelli, Rhynchonycteris naso) and rodents (Coendou rufescens, Microryzomys altissimus) were documented. Additionally, the presence of a spirochete was detected by microscopy in the liver of a Sturnira erythromos bat specimen. These results contain the first molecular evidence of the presence of B. burgdorferi s.s. in South America, which merits the need for comprehensive studies involving arthropods and vertebrates (including humans) in other departments of Colombia, as well as neighboring countries, to understand the current status of the circulation of Borrelia spp. in South America.

1. Introduction

The genus Borrelia (Spirochaetales: Borreliaceae) comprises about 43 recognized species of gram-negative motile spirochetes, ranging in length from 10–40 µm and 0.2–0.5 µm in diameter [1,2,3,4]. Borrelia are obligate vector-borne parasites that infect a wide diversity of vertebrate hosts, such as birds, reptiles, and mammals, including human as an accidental host [5,6,7,8]. Since the description of the genus Borrelia in 1907 [9], the number of described species and strains is increasing, grouping them into three well-defined phylogenetic groups: the Lyme disease or Lyme borreliosis group (LDG), the relapsing fever group (RFG), and the Borrelia associated with reptiles and monotremes group (RMG) [5,10].
Lyme disease (LD) is a multisystemic anthropozoonosis caused by the Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. complex, consisting of 20 recognized species, and with higher incidence in North America, Asia, and Europe [11,12,13,14,15]. Within B. burgdorferi s.l., there are six species of public health importance; however, B. burgdorferi s.s., Borrelia garinii, and Borrelia afzelii are the main etiological agents of LD in humans [15,16,17,18]. Vectors involved in LD transmission are hard ticks from the genus Ixodes (Ixodidae), in particular, Ixodes ricinus, I. pacificus, and I. scapularis [15,19]. Generally, the reservoirs are small rodents and birds, in which infection is asymptomatic [14,19]; in contrast, in humans and domestic animals such as dogs and cattle, a pathological syndrome can be triggered [14]. The most common clinical manifestation of the disease is erythema migrans [19,20,21]; however, when LD is not treated, spirochetes can colonize different tissues, leading to multi-organ clinical manifestations such as arthritis and cardiac conditions [22,23,24].
Similarly, relapsing fevers (RF) are infectious, neglected, and emerging diseases in the Americas and in some African countries, caused by 21 recognized species [4,25,26]. Vectors involved in the transmission cycle of relapsing fevers are mainly soft ticks of the genus Ornithodoros (Argasidae), hard ticks of the genera Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Ixodes, and Rhipicephalus, the human body louse or clothing louse Pediculus humanus humanus, the latter vector of Borrelia recurrentis [4,5,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Borrelia of the RFG exhibit transovarial and transstadial transmission in ticks, highlighting the importance of these vectors in the enzootic and epizootic cycles of the disease [4,29,32]. In addition, hosts and reservoirs of Borrelia of the RFG include rodents, opossums, and bats [30,32]; except for Borrelia duttoni, which is only known in humans as natural hosts [27]. Regarding the symptomatology of the disease, patients present episodes of high fever spaced by afebrile periods [16,30,33].
In recent decades, several tick-borne pathogens have been documented worldwide, including Lyme disease and relapsing fevers [34,35,36]. In recent years, several Borrelia genospecies have been reported using molecular tools in South America in both hosts and their vectors [37,38,39,40,41,42]. In Colombia, there are reports of the possible presence of Borrelia in humans since 1906, when Borrelia-like forms were first recorded in the country through blood smears of febrile patients in the Andean Region of the departments of Cundinamarca and Boyacá [43,44]; likewise, in 1907, a symptomatology compatible to RF was reported in the city of Manizales, Department of Caldas [45]. In addition, Borrelia spp. infection has been reported in humans in the Andean, Caribbean, and Pacific regions of the departments of Antioquia, Chocó, Córdoba, and Valle del Cauca [46,47,48,49,50], as well as in domestic animals in the departments of Antioquia and Cauca [51,52]. In Colombian wildlife, the presence of spirochetes has been reported in bats roosting at the Macaregua cave in the Department of Santander [40,53] and in the Department of Córdoba [54]; however, none of these reports correspond to B. burgdorferi s.s. Using metagenomic analysis, Carvajal-Agudelo et al. (2022) [55] reported the presence of Borrelia in bats and in Ornithodoros hasei soft ticks in the Department of Arauca.
Considering that Borrelia infections are usually subclinical, investigations of Borrelia spp. in wild mammals in Colombia are scarce, and that the impact and circulation of Borrelia spp. in the country is not well-known, the objective of the research was to determine the Borrelia species present in wild mammals and their associations with their hosts in the Andean Region of the Department of Caldas, Colombia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study was conducted in six municipalities of the Andean and inter-Andean valleys of Colombia (Figure 1): Manizales, Neira, Norcasia, Palestina, and Villamaría in the Department of Caldas and Marsella in the Department of Risaralda. The sampling sites were located in the basins of the Magdalena and Cauca Rivers, on both slopes of the Central Cordillera. This zone has an elevational range between 214 m and 5750 m, and the temperature varies according to the elevation [56,57].

2.2. Capture and Sampling of Mammals

Mammal capture was carried out using between two and six mist nets, 50–60 Sherman, and 10–12 Tomahawk traps per sampling site, using directed sampling without standardized efforts. One rodent (Coendou rufescens) was found dead in the study area. Each locality was sampled once for three to four days between March 2021 and April 2022. The Sherman and Tomahawk traps were installed on the first day of sampling between 10:00 and 12:00 h and were removed on the last sampling day between 6:00 and 8:00 h. The mist nets were installed and opened between 17:30 and 20:00 h. A capillary blood sample for blood smear was taken from each of the captured animals. To corroborate taxonomic identification, individuals were collected and euthanized following animal care recommendations [58,59]. Identification of the collected specimens was based on taxonomic keys [60,61] and subsequently deposited in the Mammal Collection of the Museum of Natural History of the University of Caldas (MHN-UCa). Wild mammal capture and collection were conducted with the approval of the Comité de Bioética de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales of the Universidad de Caldas (20 September 2019).

2.3. Morphological and Molecular Detection of Borrelia

To morphologically detect spirochetes, fine-drop blood smears (four plates per individual) and organ impressions on plates (two for each organ) were performed. Blood samples were obtained by puncture in the brachial vein (in bats) or by making a small cut at the end of the tail (in non-flying mammals), as well as through cardiac puncture after euthanasia. The organs (kidneys, liver, lungs, heart, and in some cases, brain and/or marrow), were arranged individually in sterile Petri dishes and washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) [62]. Each organ was then taken separately, washed again with PBS, cut longitudinally or transversely, excess blood was removed with sterile WypAll towels and pressed several times on the slide, and when necessary, several cuts were made. Additionally, and individually, each tissue was stored in absolute ethanol at 4 °C for subsequent molecular analysis (in paired organs, such as kidneys and lungs, a sample was taken from each one). All the materials used in the manipulation of the organs (forceps, scissors, Petri dishes) were washed with iodopovidone and distilled water and sterilized in a portable disinfection box (UV sterilization box 99% Obecilc I-lmh200317), including the WypAll towels. This process was performed each time a different organ was handled. Finally, the plates were fixed with absolute methanol for three minutes for blood smears and five minutes for organ impressions, then stained with 4% Giemsa solution for 40 min for blood and 45 min for organs. Each plate was reviewed using an OLYMPUS BX43 microscope and brightfield at the Laboratory of Molecular Biology of the Universidad de Caldas.
For the detection and molecular identification of Borrelia spp. extractions were performed for each individual and tissue, using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (according to the standard protocol suggested by the manufacturer). In the DNA extraction, ultrapure water was used as a negative control, and in the PCR amplification, a reaction control was used in each reaction with Borrelia anserina and Borrelia venezuelensis as positive controls, which were donated by the Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias under the direction of Dr. Marcelo Bahia Labruna of the Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo (USP-Brazil). Extracted DNA was subjected to nested PCR (nPCR) to amplify the flagellin B (flaB) gene: the first reaction mix was performed at a final volume of 20 µL with the external primer pair FLA LL 5′-ACATATTCAGATGCAGACAGAGAGGT-3′ and FLA RL 5′-ACATCATAGCCATTGCAGCAGACAGAGGT-3′, which amplified a 664 bp fragment. The mixture for the nested reaction was made at a final volume of 30 µL with the primers FLA LS 5′-AACAGCTGAAGAGAGCTTGGAATG-3′ and FLA RS 5′-CTTTGATCACTTATCATTCATTCTAATAGC-3′, which amplified a fragment of approximately 330 bp [63]. PCR products were evaluated by horizontal electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide, visualized on a GelDoc-It® 2310 Image photodocumenter (UVP) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and sent to Macrogen (South Korea) for purification and sequencing.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

Partial sequences of the flaB gene were evaluated and edited in Geneious Prime® 2022.2.2 software [64]. Species identification and analysis considered similarity estimates with 50 public Borrelia sequences available in GenBank, including four sequences from Colombia and Borrelia turcica (associated with reptiles and monotremes) as outgroup. Sequence alignment was run in MAFFT [65] included in Geneious, and the best evolutionary model was selected in ModelFinder using AIC criterion [66]. A maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis was performed in IQ-TREE [67], under the TIM3 + G4 + F model for 5000 ultrafast [68] bootstraps, as well as the Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-like aLRT branch test) with 1000 replicates [69], included in the PhyloSuite platform [70], and the phylogenetic tree viewer FigTree v.1.4.3 [71] (Rambaut 2007) was used. Sequences obtained in this study were deposited in GenBank, and allelic matches were identified in Borrelia typing database at http://pubmlst.org/borrelia/ (accessed on 14 October 2022) [72]. Finally, genetic distances were estimated using the p-distance method with the MEGA 11 program [73]. Additionally, association networks were performed between Borrelia species and wild mammalian species, as well as between Borrelia species and the tissues evaluated; for this, R studio version 4.2.1 was used [74].

3. Results

A total of 105 mammals across 40 species, 10 families, and three orders (Didelphimorphia, Chiroptera, and Rodentia) were captured and analyzed (Table S1). A total of eight species of the order Chiroptera and four of the order Rodentia were found to be infected by Borrelia spp. with a prevalence of infection of 15.2% (n = 16). The families Phyllostomidae (Chiroptera) and Cricetidae (Rodentia) presented the highest number of infected species with seven and two, respectively (Table 1).
A total of 470 tissue and organ samples (blood, liver, lung, heart, kidney, and brain) were examined. The prevalence of Borrelia spp. infection in samples was 5.1% (n = 24). In the liver, 25% (6/24) of the cases of infection were recorded, and in one bat specimen of Artibeus lituratus (Phyllostomidae), Borrelia sp. infection was present in all five tissues evaluated (except brain, which was not examined) (Table 1, Figure 2a). An individual of Microryzomys altissimus (Rodentia: Cricetidae) presented an exclusive infection in the brain with an identity of 99.61% with Borrelia venezuelensis [MG651650] from the RFG (Table 1). Additionally, by means of brightfield microscopy, a spirochete with an approximate length of 10.3 µm was detected in the liver of Sturnira erythromos (Figure 2b), while there was an LDG detection in the lung of the same individual.
Twenty-four (24) partial sequences of the flaB gene (~315 pb) were obtained and were deposited in GenBank with accession codes [OP491407-OP491408; OP480441-OP480462]. Seven of these sequences showed identity between 99.19%–99.64% with B. venezuelensis [MG651650] and Borrelia turicatae [MH632129] from the RFG. Two sequences showed an identity of 99.64% and 100% with B. burgdorferi s.s. [CP002228; AY374137] from the LDG, and 15 sequences showed an identity between 94.52% and 98.56% with one of the Borrelia genospecies [MT154618] found in Macaregua Cave in Colombia. Furthermore, four allelic variants were found in the Borrelia typing database, one for RFG and three for LDG (Table 1).
The phylogenetic reconstruction obtained by ML using flaB sequences showed that two of the sequences of this study form a monophyletic clade with B. burgdorferi s.s. with a statistical support greater than 92% and a group with the sequences of the same species that were reported in the USA and Canada, with divergences between 0–1.1% (Figure 3; Table S2). Another monophyletic group was formed by 15 sequences of Borrelia sp. genospecies isolated from bats in Colombia (statistical support of 98.8%), which branches as a sister group of the LDG borreliae and are related to the sequences recorded in Macaregua Cave, Colombia (Figure 3; Table S2). Finally, the remaining seven sequences had genetic distances between them of 0–0.4%, are associated with the RFG, and are more closely related to B. venezuelensis (Brazil) with a statistical support of 83.5% in the ML tree and with genetic distances between 0–1.1% (Figure 3; Table S2).
Finally, 13 associations between Borrelia and wild mammals were reported, involving Borrelia genospecies and 12 mammal species. Borrelia from the RFG presented the highest number of associations with several species of bats and rodents. In contrast, Borrelia genospecies branching as a sister group of the LDG were associated only with bats, and B. burgdorferi s.s. found in this study was associated with two rodent species: Thomasomys aureus (Rodentia: Cricetidae) and Mus musculus (Rodentia: Muridae) (Figure 4). Overall, blood was the tissue with the highest richness of Borrelia genospecies reported in this study (Figure 4g).

4. Discussion and Conclusions

Our results represent the first molecular evidence of the presence of B. burgdorferi s.s. in South America, a species that was considered absent in this region of the continent, where the presence of its known vectors is not recorded [16,75]. Nevertheless, the results obtained do not rule out the possibility that other ectoparasite species may be acting as vectors of these spirochetes, as recorded by other authors [38,76,77]. For South America, several Lyme disease group genospecies have previously been documented in both wild mammals and ticks [8,38,42,78,79,80]. In countries such as Brazil, the Baggio–Yoshinari syndrome has occurred, which is clinically similar to Lyme disease [81]; however, the causative agent could not be confirmed to be B. burgdorferi s.s. [82].
The ML reconstruction is congruent with previous reported phylogenetic inferences [37,40,52,80,83]. In particular, the Borrelia sequences recorded from bats in the present study are closely related to genospecies isolated from Carollia perspicillata in the Department of Santander, Colombia [40]. This relationship may indicate that the genospecies reported in our study and those recorded by Muñoz-Leal et al. (2021) [40] and Jorge et al. (2022) [80] are Borrelia restricted to bats, but further studies are needed to help support this hypothesis.
Furthermore, the presence of B. burgdorferi s.s. in rodents (i.e., T. aureus and M. musculus) indicates their potential role as reservoirs for Lyme disease in the country, as has been observed in other rodents in Eurasia and North America [84,85]. Cricetid rodents (e.g., Peromyscus leucopus) have been evidenced to be competent reservoirs for B. burgdorferi s.l. in North America [84,85,86,87] and South America [8,42]. A high prevalence of infection by B. burgdorferi s.l. and other Borrelia species has been reported in other rodents such as murids [88,89]. Muridae have acquired great importance in zoonotic diseases, since their populations usually reach a large number of individuals that can act as hosts of ectoparasites and reservoirs of pathogens [89]. Similarly, some murids have colonized urban or rural environments, where they have close contact with humans and domestic animals, increasing the risk of infection [89].
The presence of Borrelia in the brain of M. altissimus coincides with the neurotropic characteristic of several Borrelia species [90,91], as is the case with Treponema pallidum [91]. Borrelia species are thought to infect the brain to evade the host immune response and may occasionally invade the blood to facilitate bacterial transmission [92]. This is likely the case for B. duttonii and B. turicatae, which have detected in the brains of rodents [91,92,93], and B. miyamotoi and B. burgdorferi, which were detected in the brain of rodents and a shrew (Sorex maritimensis) [94]. Due to the complexity of brain extraction, this organ was studied only in one specimen; therefore, we recommend including the brain in Lyme disease studies, as the ability of an infected host to potentially serve as a reservoir could be underestimated [95]. Additionally, the high prevalence of infection in the liver (25%) can be explained through one of the functions of this organ, which by filtering the blood, is likely to be one of the first tissues to be infected when spirochetes leave the circulatory system [94]. Furthermore, species of the B. burgdorferi complex have been shown to use the liver as a refuge to evade the immune response in long-term infections [96,97,98].
Finally, this research provides molecular evidence of the presence of B. burgdorferi s.s. in South America. Likewise, new associations between mammals and Borrelia sp. are presented for the American continent. These findings suggest that the presence of species of the genus Borrelia could be widely distributed in the wildlife of Colombia. However, complementary studies should be carried out to determine the real status of Borrelia spp. in South America and to establish the role played by wild mammals in the maintenance of infections by these spirochetes, as well as their participation in the enzootic and zoonotic cycles of Borrelia sp.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/tropicalmed7120428/s1: Table S1: Wild mammals sampled (Departments of Caldas and Risaralda). Individuals that were positive for Borrelia are highlighted in bold.—indicates that the information is not available; Table S2: Intraspecific and interspecific distances based on the p-distance method for the flagellin gene fragment (flaB) with the MEGA v. 11 program. In bold are the sequences obtained in this study and the GenBank accession numbers are provided in parentheses.

Author Contributions

Methodology, H.E.R.-C., F.A.R.-P. and P.A.O.-L.; formal analysis, P.A.O.-L.; investigation, L.Y.M.-A., L.F.B.-M. and P.A.O.-L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Y.M.-A. and L.F.B.-M.; writing—review and editing, P.A.O.-L., F.A.R.-P., G.J.C.-V. and H.E.R.-C.; supervision, F.A.R.-P.; funding acquisition, F.A.R.-P. and G.J.C.-V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the Vicerrectoría de Investigaciones y Posgrados [Code: 71717] [Code: 0277620] [Code: 0318322] and Vicerrectoría de Proyección Universitaria “Consolidación de la propuesta Bioparque Montelindo, Granja Montelindo, Santagueda, Palestina, Caldas”—Universidad de Caldas. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación of Colombia—Minciencias: “Convocatoria del Fondo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación del Sistema General de Regalías para la conformación de una lista de proyectos elegibles para ser viabilizados, priorizados y aprobados por el OCAD dentro del Programa de Becas de Excelencia cohorte 1–2019—Código BPIN 2019000100035, resolución No. 488 with the project—“Garrapatas (Acari: Ixodidae) de mamíferos en Arauca—Colombia: una aproximación a las interacciones vector, patógeno y hospedero” and the Program “Relación, distribución, taxonomía de especies de garrapatas asociadas a mamíferos silvestres en zonas endémicas de rickettsiosis en Colombia. Un acercamiento a la comprensión de la relación vectores patógenos-reservorios”, [Code: 120385270267 and CTO 80740-200-2021]—Project “Garrapatas asociadas a mamíferos silvestres en el departamento de Caldas: Diversidad, detección de patógenos y distribución [Code: 71717]”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Wild mammal capture and collection were done with the approval of the Comité de Bioética de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales de la Universidad de Caldas and were executed under the framework permit granted by the National Environmental Licensing Authority (ANLA) to the Universidad de Caldas under resolution 02497 of 31 December 2018. No species registered in the list of threatened wild species of the Colombian biological diversity consigned in resolution Number 1912 of 2017 were collected.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

Vicerrectoría de Investigaciones y Posgrados; Vicerrectoría de Proyección Universitaria-Universidad de Caldas and Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación of Colombia-Minciencias for the association of Lorys Yorelys Mancilla Agrono as Young Researcher and Undergraduate Innovator through the Call 891 of 2020 and project “Garrapatas (Acari: Ixodidae) de pequeños mamíferos en Arauca (Arauca, Colombia): una aproximación al ciclo de transmisión de borreliosis o enfermedad de Lyme [Code: 0277620]”. We thank Ingrith Y. Mejía-Fontecha, Héctor Fabio Arias Monsalve, Mateo Ortíz Giraldo, Alexandra Cardona Giraldo, Andrés Tamayo, Daniela Velásquez, Johnathan Alvarez-Londoño; the Central Hidroeléctrica de Caldas S.A. E.S.P.(CHEC); and all the landowners and the general community of the localities sampled.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cutler, S.J. Relapsing fever borreliae: A global review. Clin. Lab. Med. 2015, 35, 847–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cutler, S.J.; Ruzic-Sabljic, E.; Potkonjak, A. Emerging borreliae—Expanding beyond Lyme borreliosis. Mol. Cell. Probes 2017, 31, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Margos, G.; Fingerle, V.; Cutler, S.; Gofton, A.; Stevenson, B.; Estrada-Peña, A. Controversies in bacterial taxonomy: The example of the genus Borrelia. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Faccini-Martínez, A.A.; Silva-Ramos, C.R.; Santodomingo, A.M.; Ramírez-Hernández, A.; Costa, F.B.; Labruna, M.B.; Muñoz-Leal, S. Historical overview and update on relapsing fever group Borrelia in Latin America. Parasites Vectors 2022, 15, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Margos, G.; Gofton, A.; Wibberg, D.; Dangel, A.; Marosevic, D.; Loh, S.M.; Oskam, C.; Fingerle, V. The genus Borrelia reloaded. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rogovskyy, A.; Batool, M.; Gillis, D.C.; Holman, P.J.; Nebogatkin, I.V.; Rogovska, Y.V.; Rogovskyy, M.S. Diversity of Borrelia spirochetes and other zoonotic agents in ticks from Kyiv, Ukraine. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. O’Keeffe, K.R.; Oppler, Z.J.; Brisson, D. Evolutionary ecology of Lyme Borrelia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 85, 104570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Weck, B.C.; Serpa, M.C.A.; Labruna, M.B.; Muñoz-Leal, S.A. Novel Genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato Associated with Cricetid Rodents in Brazil. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Swellengrebel, N.H. Sur la cytologie comparée des spirochètes et des spirilles. Annales de l’Institut Pasteur 1907, 21, 562–586. [Google Scholar]
  10. Binetruy, F.; Garnier, S.; Boulanger, N.; Talagrand-Reboul, E.; Loire, E.; Faivre, B.; Noel, V.; Buysse, M.; Duron, O. A novel Borrelia species, intermediate between Lyme disease and relapsing fever groups, in neotropical passerine-associated ticks. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lantos, P.M.; Auwaerter, P.G.; Wormser, G.P. A systematic review of Borrelia burgdorferi morphologic variants does not support a role in chronic Lyme disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 58, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Marques, A.R.; Strle, F.; Wormser, G.P. Comparison of Lyme disease in the United States and Europe. Emerging Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 2017–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Estrada-Peña, A.; Cutler, S.; Potkonjak, A.; Vassier-Tussaut, M.; Van Bortel, W.; Zeller, H.; Fernández-Ruiz, N.; Mihalca, A.D. An updated meta-analysis of the distribution and prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. in ticks in Europe. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2018, 17, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Trevisan, G.; Cinco, M.; Trevisini, S.; di Meo, N.; Chersi, K.; Ruscio, M.; Forgione, P.; Bonin, S. Borreliae part 1: Borrelia Lyme group and Echidna-reptile group. Biology 2021, 10, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Steinbrink, A.; Brugger, K.; Margos, G.; Kraiczy, P.; Klimpel, S. The evolving story of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato transmission in Europe. Parasitol. Res. 2022, 121, 781–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rudenko, N.; Golovchenko, M.; Grubhoffer, L.; Oliver, J.H., Jr. Updates on Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex with respect to public health. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2011, 2, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Strnad, M.; Hönig, V.; Růžek, D.; Grubhoffer, L.; Rego, R.O. Europe-wide meta-analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato prevalence in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e00609-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Cardenas-de la Garza, J.A.; la Cruz-Valadez, D.; Ocampo-Candiani, J.; Welsh, O. Clinical spectrum of Lyme disease. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 38, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Steere, A.C.; Strle, F.; Wormser, G.P.; Hu, L.T.; Branda, J.A.; Hovius, J.W.; Li, X.; Mead, P.S. Lyme borreliosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2016, 2, 16090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Dos Santos, C.A.; Suzin, A.; Vogliotti, A.; Nunes, P.H.; Barbieri, A.R.M.; Labruna, M.B.; Szabó, M.P.J.; Yokosawa, J. Molecular detection of a Borrelia sp. in nymphs of Amblyomma brasiliense ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) from Iguaçu National Park, Brazil, genetically related to Borrelia from Ethiopia and Côte d’Ivoire. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Knoll, S.; Springer, A.; Hauck, D.; Schunack, B.; Pachnicke, S.; Fingerle, V.; Strube, C. Distribution of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Borrelia miyamotoi in Ixodes tick populations in Northern Germany, co-infections with Rickettsiales and assessment of potential influencing factors. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2021, 35, 595–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Trevisan, G.; Cinco, M. Lyme disease: A general survey. Int. J. Dermatol. 1990, 29, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Radolf, J.D.; Strle, K.; Lemieux, J.E.; Strle, F. Lyme disease in humans. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2021, 42, 333–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Signs and Symptoms of Untreated Lyme Disease. 2021. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/signs_symptoms/index.html (accessed on 19 July 2022).
  25. Lopez, J.E.; Krishnavahjala, A.; Garcia, M.N.; Bermudez, S. Tick-borne relapsing fever spirochetes in the Americas. Vet. Sci. 2016, 3, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Jakab, Á.; Kahlig, P.; Kuenzli, E.; Neumayr, A. Tick borne relapsing fever—A systematic review and analysis of the literature. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Talagrand-Reboul, E.; Boyer, P.H.; Bergström, S.; Vial, L.; Boulanger, N. Relapsing fevers: Neglected tick-borne diseases. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Warrell, D.A. Louse-borne relapsing fever (Borrelia recurrentis infection). Epidemiol. Infect. 2019, 147, E106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Krishnavajhala, A.; Armstrong, B.A.; Kneubehl, A.R.; Gunter, S.M.; Piccione, J.; Kim, H.J.; Ramirez, R.; Castro-Arellano, I.; Roachell, W.; Teel, P.D.; et al. Diversity and distribution of the tick-borne relapsing fever spirochete Borrelia turicatae. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lopez, J.; Hovius, J.W.; Bergstrom, S. Pathogenesis of relapsing fever. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2021, 42, 519–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhigailov, A.V.; Neupokoyeva, A.S.; Maltseva, E.R.; Perfilyeva, Y.V.; Bissenbay, A.O.; Turebekov, N.A.; Frey, S.; Essbauer, S.; Abdiyeva, K.S.; Ostapchuk, Y.O.; et al. The prevalence of Borrelia in Ixodes persulcatus in southeastern Kazakhstan. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2021, 12, 101716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Trevisan, G.; Cinco, M.; Trevisini, S.; di Meo, N.; Ruscio, M.; Forgione, P.; Bonin, S. Borreliae part 2: Borrelia relapsing fever group and unclassified Borrelia. Biology 2021, 10, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, Z.M.; Xiao, X.; Zhou, C.M.; Liu, J.X.; Gu, X.L.; Fang, L.Z.; Liu, B.Y.; Wang, L.R.; Yu, X.J.; Han, H.J. Human-pathogenic relapsing fever Borrelia found in bats from Central China phylogenetically clustered together with relapsing fever borreliae reported in the New World. PLoS Negl. Trop Dis. 2021, 15, e0009113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Socolovschi, C.; Kernif, T.; Raoult, D.; Parola, P. Borrelia, Rickettsia, and Ehrlichia species in bat ticks, France, 2010. Emerg. Infect Dis. 2012, 18, 1966–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Davoust, B.; Marié, J.L.; Dahmani, M.; Berenger, J.M.; Bompar, J.M.; Blanchet, D.; Cheuret, M.; Raoult, D.; Mediannikov, O. Evidence of Bartonella spp. in blood and ticks (Ornithodoros hasei) of bats, in French Guiana. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016, 16, 516–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ferreira, M.S.; Guterres, A.; Rozental, T.; Novaes, R.L.M.; Vilar, E.M.; de Oliveira, R.C.; Fernandes, J.; Forneas, D.; Junior, A.A.; Brandão, M.L.; et al. Coxiella and Bartonella spp. in bats (Chiroptera) captured in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest biome. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Muñoz-Leal, S.; Faccini-Martínez, Á.A.; Costa, F.B.; Marcili, A.; Mesquita, E.T.; Marques, E.P., Jr.; Labruna, M.B. Isolation and molecular characterization of a relapsing fever Borrelia recovered from Ornithodoros rudis in Brazil. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 864–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Muñoz-Leal, S.; Lopes, M.G.; Marcili, A.; Martins, T.F.; González-Acuña, D.; Labruna, M.B. Anaplasmataceae, Borrelia and Hepatozoon agents in ticks (Acari: Argasidae, Ixodidae) from Chile. Acta Trop. 2019, 192, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Muñoz-Leal, S.; Marcili, A.; Fuentes-Castillo, D.; Ayala, M.; Labruna, M.B. A relapsing fever Borrelia and spotted fever Rickettsia in ticks from an Andean valley, central Chile. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2019, 78, 403–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Muñoz-Leal, S.; Faccini-Martínez, Á.A.; Pérez-Torres, J.; Chala-Quintero, S.M.; Herrera-Sepúlveda, M.T.; Cuervo, C.; Labruna, M.B. Novel Borrelia genotypes in bats from the Macaregua Cave, Colombia. Zoonoses Public Health 2021, 68, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Morel, N.; De Salvo, M.N.; Cicuttin, G.; Rossner, V.; Thompson, C.S.; Mangold, A.J.; Nava, S. The presence of Borrelia theileri in Argentina. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2019, 17, 100314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sánchez, R.S.T.; Santodomingo, A.M.S.; Muñoz-Leal, S.; Silva-de la Fuente, M.C.; Llanos-Soto, S.; Salas, L.M.; González-Acuña, D. Rodents as potential reservoirs for Borrelia spp. in northern Chile. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2020, 29, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Franco, R.; Toro, G.; Martínez, J. Fiebre amarilla y fiebre espiroquetal. Ses. Científicas Centen. Acad. Nac. Med. Bogota. 1911, 1, 169–227. [Google Scholar]
  44. Roca-García, M. Contribución al Estudio de la Fiebre Espiroquetal en Colombia; Universidad Nacional, Facultad de Medicina: Bogotá, Colombia, 1934. [Google Scholar]
  45. Robledo, E. Fiebre recurrente en Manizales. Bol. Med. 1907, 1, 113–118. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pampana, E.J. Notes on colombian relapsing fever. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1928, 21, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Palacios, R.; Osorio, L.E.; Giraldo, L.E.; Torres, A.J.; Philipp, M.T.; Ochoa, M.T. Positive IgG western blot for Borrelia burgdorferi in Colombia. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1999, 94, 499–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zuluaga de Cadena, A.; Botero, F.; Herrera, W.; Robledo, J.; Cortés, A.; Acevedo, M.C.L. Enfermedad de Lyme: Un caso comprobado en Colombia. Rev. CES Med. 2000, 14, 44–50. [Google Scholar]
  49. Miranda, J.; Mattar, S.; Perdomo, K.; Palencia, L. Seroprevalencia de borreliosis, o enfermedad de Lyme, en una población rural expuesta de Córdoba, Colombia. Rev. Salud Pública 2009, 11, 480–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Cuevas-Peláez, M.; Correa-García, A.; López-Mahecha, J.M. Panuveítis asociada a la enfermedad de Lyme en un paciente colombiano. Reporte de caso. Iatreia 2020, 33, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. González-Domínguez, M.S.; Villegas, J.P.; Carmona, S.; Castañeda, H. First report of canine borreliosis seroprevalence in a middle-altitude tropical urban area (Medellín-Colombia). Ces. Med. Vet. 2014, 9, 348–354. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ramírez-Hernández, A.; Arroyave, E.; Faccini-Martínez, Á.A.; Martínez-Diaz, H.C.; Betancourt-Ruiz, P.; Olaya-M, L.A.; Forero-Becerra, E.G.; Hidalgo, M.; Blanton, L.S.; Walker, D.H. Emerging Tickborne Bacteria in Cattle from Colombia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2022, 28, 2109–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Marinkelle, C.J.; Grose, E.S. Species of Borrelia from a Colombian bat (Natalus tumidirostris). Nature 1968, 218, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. López, Y.; Muñoz-Leal, S.; Martínez, C.; Guzmán, C.; Calderón, A.; Martínez, J.; Galeano, K.; Muñoz, M.; Ramírez, J.D.; Faccini-Martínez, A.A.; et al. Molecular evidence of Borrelia spp. in bats from Córdoba department, northwest Colombia. Prepint paper. Res. Sq. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Carvajal-Agudelo, J.D.; Ramírez-Chaves, H.E.; Ossa-López, P.A.; Rivera-Páez, F.A. Bacteria related to tick-borne pathogen assemblages in Ornithodoros cf. hasei (Acari: Argasidae) and blood of the wild mammal hosts in the Orinoquia region, Colombia. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2022, 87, 253–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. Caldas Aspectos Geográficos; Imprenta IGAC: Bogotá, Colombia, 1990.
  57. Corpocaldas. Plan de Acción. Corporación Autónoma Regional de Caldas. 2013. Available online: https://historico.corpocaldas.gov.co/publicaciones/331/PlanAccion2013-2015-VerDef-Web.pdf (accessed on 16 August 2022).
  58. Sikes, R.S.; The Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists. 2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education. J. Mammal. 2016, 97, 663–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Guidelines and Policies. 2018. Available online: https://ursa.research.gsu.edu/files/2016/02/IACUC-Policies-and-Procedures.pdf (accessed on 16 August 2022).
  60. Gardner, A.L. (Ed.) Marsupials, Xenarthrans, Shrews, and Bats. In Mammals of South America; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2008; Volume 1, p. 690. [Google Scholar]
  61. Patton, J.L.; Pardiñas, U.F.J.; D’elía, G. (Eds.) Rodents. In Mammals of South America; The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2015; Volume 2, p. 1336. [Google Scholar]
  62. Farbehi, N.; Janbandhu, V.; Nordon, R.E.; Harvey, R.P. FACS Enrichment of Total Interstitial Cells and Fibroblasts from Adult Mouse Ventricles. Bio-protocol 2021, 11, e4028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Stromdahl, E.Y.; Williamson, P.C.; Kollars, T.M., Jr.; Evans, S.R.; Barry, R.K.; Vince, M.A.; Dobbs, N.A. Evidence of Borrelia lonestari DNA in Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) removed from humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 5557–5562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Drummond, A.J.; Ashton, B.; Cheung, M.; Heled, J.; Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Stones-Havas, S.; Thierer, T.; Wilson, A. Geneious 8. 2009. Available online: http://www.geneious.com (accessed on 10 July 2022).
  65. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; Von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Minh, B.Q.; Nguyen, M.A.T.; von Haeseler, A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Zhang, D.; Gao, F.; Jakovlić, I.; Zou, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.X.; Wang, G.T. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Rambaut, A. FigTree v1.4.3, A Graphical Viewer of Phylogenetic Trees. 2007. Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree (accessed on 12 October 2022).
  72. Jolley, K.A.; Bray, J.E.; Maiden, M.C.J. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018, 24, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Reference Index Version 4.2.1; Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2022; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 8 August 2022).
  75. Robles, A.; Fong, J.; Cervantes, J. Borrelia Infection in Latin America. Rev. Investig. Clin. 2018, 70, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ivanova, L.B.; Tomova, A.; González-Acuña, D.; Murúa, R.; Moreno, C.X.; Hernández, C.; Cabello, J.; Cabello, C.; Daniels, T.J.; Godfrey, H.P.; et al. Borrelia chilensis, a new member of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex that extends the range of this genospecies in the Southern Hemisphere. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 6, 1069–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Sebastian, P.S.; Bottero, M.N.S.; Carvalho, L.; Mackenstedt, U.; Lareschi, M.; Venzal, J.M.; Nava, S. Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ixodes cf. neuquenensis and Ixodes sigelos ticks from the Patagonian region of Argentina. Acta Trop. 2016, 162, 218–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Muñoz-Leal, S.; Ramirez, D.G.; Luz, H.R.; Faccini, J.L.; Labruna, M.B. “Candidatus Borrelia ibitipoquensis,” a Borrelia valaisiana–related genospecies characterized from Ixodes paranaensis in Brazil. Microb. Ecol. 2020, 80, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Colunga-Salas, P.; Sánchez-Montes, S.; León-Paniagua, L.; Becker, I. Borrelia in neotropical bats: Detection of two new phylogenetic lineages. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2021, 12, 101642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jorge, F.R.; Muñoz-Leal, S.; de Oliveira, G.M.B.; Serpa, M.C.A.; Magalhães, M.M.L.; de Oliveira, L.M.B.; Moura, F.B.P.; Teixeira, B.M.; Labruna, M.B. Novel Borrelia Genotypes from Brazil Indicate a New Group of Borrelia spp. Associated with South American Bats. J. Med. Entomol. 2022, 68, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yoshinari, N.H.; Mantovani, E.; Bonoldi, V.L.N.; Marangoni, R.G.; Gauditano, G. Brazilian lyme-like disease or Baggio-Yoshinari syndrome: Exotic and emerging Brazilian tick-borne zoonosis. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2010, 56, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Yoshinari, N.H.; Bonoldi, V.L.N.; Bonin, S.; Falkingham, E.; Trevisan, G. The Current State of Knowledge on Baggio–Yoshinari Syndrome (Brazilian Lyme Disease-like Illness): Chronological Presentation of Historical and Scientific Events Observed over the Last 30 Years. Pathogens 2022, 11, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kneubehl, A.R.; Krishnavajhala, A.; Leal, S.M.; Replogle, A.J.; Kingry, L.C.; Bermúdez, S.E.; Labruna, M.B.; Lopez, J.E. Comparative genomics of the Western Hemisphere soft tick-borne relapsing fever borreliae highlights extensive plasmid diversity. BMC Genomics 2022, 23, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Schwanz, L.E.; Voordouw, M.J.; Brisson, D.; Ostfeld, R.S. Borrelia burgdorferi has minimal impact on the Lyme disease reservoir host Peromyscus leucopus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 11, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Wolcott, K.A.; Margos, G.; Fingerle, V.; Becker, N.S. Host association of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato: A review. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2021, 12, 101766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Levine, J.F.; Wilson, M.L.; Spielman, A. Mice as reservoirs of the Lyme disease spirochete. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1985, 34, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Larson, R.T.; Bron, G.M.; Lee, X.; Zembsch, T.E.; Siy, P.N.; Paskewitz, S.M. Peromyscus maniculatus (Rodentia: Cricetidae): An overlooked reservoir of tick-borne pathogens in the Midwest, USA? Ecosphere 2021, 12, e03831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Richter, D.; Schlee, D.B.; Matuschka, F.R. Reservoir competence of various rodents for the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia spielmanii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3565–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Solís-Hernández, A.; Rodríguez-Vivas, R.I.; Esteve-Gassent, M.D.; Villegas-Pérez, S.L. Prevalencia de Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato en roedores sinantrópicos de dos comunidades rurales de Yucatán, México. Biomédica 2016, 36, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Gebbia, J.A.; Monco, J.C.G.; Degen, J.L.; Bugge, T.H.; Benach, J.L. The plasminogen activation system enhances brain and heart invasion in murine relapsing fever borreliosis. J. Clin. Investig. 1999, 103, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Larsson, C.; Andersson, M.; Pelkonen, J.; Guo, B.P.; Nordstrand, A.; Bergström, S. Persistent brain infection and disease reactivation in relapsing fever borreliosis. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8, 2213–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Larsson, C.; Lundqvist, J.; Bergström, S. Residual brain infection in murine relapsing fever borreliosis can be successfully treated with ceftriaxone. Microb. Pathog. 2008, 44, 262–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Sethi, N.; Sondey, M.; Bai, Y.; Kim, K.S.; Cadavid, D. Interaction of a neurotropic strain of Borrelia turicatae with the cerebral microcirculation system. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 6408–6418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Zinck, C.B.; Lloyd, V.K. Borrelia burgdorferi and Borrelia miyamotoi in Atlantic Canadian wildlife. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0262229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ghasemi, A.; Naddaf, S.R.; Mahmoudi, A.; Rohani, M.; Naeimi, S.; Mordadi, A.; Cutler, S.J.; Mostafavi, E. Borrelia duttonii-like spirochetes parasitize Meriones persicus in East Azerbaijan Province of Iran. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2021, 12, 101825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Hovius, K.E.; Stark, L.A.M.; Bleumink-Pluym, N.M.C.; Van De Pol, I.; Verbeek-de Kruif, N.; Rijpkema, S.G.T.; Schouls, L.M.; Houwers, D.J. Presence and distribution of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species in internal organs and skin of naturally infected symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs, as detected by polymerase chain reaction. Vet. Q 1999, 21, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Summers, B.A.; Straubinger, A.F.; Jacobson, R.H.; Chang, Y.F.; Appel, M.J.G.; Straubinger, R.K. Histopathological studies of experimental Lyme disease in the dog. J. Comp. Pathol. 2005, 133, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lee, W.Y.; Moriarty, T.J.; Wong, C.H.; Zhou, H.; Strieter, R.M.; Van Rooijen, N.; Chaconas, G.; Kubes, P. An intravascular immune response to Borrelia burgdorferi involves Kupffer cells and iNKT cells. Nat. Immunol. 2010, 11, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tropicalmed 07 00428 g001 550
Figure 1. Study area. (a) American Continent, (b) Colombia, (c) Departments of Caldas and Risaralda, Colombia. Sampled localities in the municipalities of Manizales, Villamaría, Neira, Palestina, Norcasia, and Marsella. (1) Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de Café (CENICAFÉ). (2) Ecoparque Los Yarumos. (3) Jardín Botánico de la Universidad de Caldas. (4) Bosques de la CHEC. (5) Sector Santa Bárbara, finca El Edén. (6) Entrada Cementos Caldas. (7) Granja Montelindo de la Universidad de Caldas. (8) Vereda El Retiro. (9) Kilometro 35, Escuela. (10) Vereda Las Delicias, sector La Punta. (11) Vereda La Estrella, Finca El Encanto. (12) Río Cauca, túnel La Mica. Map created in ArcGis Pro 2.8.
Figure 1. Study area. (a) American Continent, (b) Colombia, (c) Departments of Caldas and Risaralda, Colombia. Sampled localities in the municipalities of Manizales, Villamaría, Neira, Palestina, Norcasia, and Marsella. (1) Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de Café (CENICAFÉ). (2) Ecoparque Los Yarumos. (3) Jardín Botánico de la Universidad de Caldas. (4) Bosques de la CHEC. (5) Sector Santa Bárbara, finca El Edén. (6) Entrada Cementos Caldas. (7) Granja Montelindo de la Universidad de Caldas. (8) Vereda El Retiro. (9) Kilometro 35, Escuela. (10) Vereda Las Delicias, sector La Punta. (11) Vereda La Estrella, Finca El Encanto. (12) Río Cauca, túnel La Mica. Map created in ArcGis Pro 2.8.
Tropicalmed 07 00428 g001
Tropicalmed 07 00428 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Agarose gel showing the products of nested PCR targeting the flagellin B (flaB) gene from Artibeus lituratus tissues: (MWM): Molecular weight marker (1 Kb plus InvitrogenTM), (Ctrl −) negative control, (Ctrl rxn 1) first PCR reaction control, (Ctrl rxn 2) nested PCR reaction control, (Ctrl +) positive control Borrelia anserina, (H) heart, (K) kidney, (Lu) lung, (Li) liver, (Bl) blood. (b) Spirochete found in liver impression smear from a bat from Sturnira erythromos species.
Figure 2. (a) Agarose gel showing the products of nested PCR targeting the flagellin B (flaB) gene from Artibeus lituratus tissues: (MWM): Molecular weight marker (1 Kb plus InvitrogenTM), (Ctrl −) negative control, (Ctrl rxn 1) first PCR reaction control, (Ctrl rxn 2) nested PCR reaction control, (Ctrl +) positive control Borrelia anserina, (H) heart, (K) kidney, (Lu) lung, (Li) liver, (Bl) blood. (b) Spirochete found in liver impression smear from a bat from Sturnira erythromos species.
Tropicalmed 07 00428 g002
Tropicalmed 07 00428 g003 550
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of the partial sequences of the flaB gene of Borrelia species in the present study (in bold) and of the sequences in GenBank (accession numbers in parentheses), using the maximum likelihood (ML) method and the GTR + G4 + F model. Numbers at nodes are selected branch support analyses; from left to right: ultrafast bootstrap values, and Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-like aLRT). The Borrelia turcica sequence was used as an outgroup.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of the partial sequences of the flaB gene of Borrelia species in the present study (in bold) and of the sequences in GenBank (accession numbers in parentheses), using the maximum likelihood (ML) method and the GTR + G4 + F model. Numbers at nodes are selected branch support analyses; from left to right: ultrafast bootstrap values, and Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood ratio test (SH-like aLRT). The Borrelia turcica sequence was used as an outgroup.
Tropicalmed 07 00428 g003
Tropicalmed 07 00428 g004 550
Figure 4. Association networks: (a) Artibeus lituratus, (b) Sturnira erythromos, (c) Platyrrhinus helleri, (d) Coendou rufescens, (e) Microryzomys altissimus; (f) associations between wild mammals and Borrelia species in the department of Caldas; (g) associations between wild mammal tissues and the Borrelia species found.
Figure 4. Association networks: (a) Artibeus lituratus, (b) Sturnira erythromos, (c) Platyrrhinus helleri, (d) Coendou rufescens, (e) Microryzomys altissimus; (f) associations between wild mammals and Borrelia species in the department of Caldas; (g) associations between wild mammal tissues and the Borrelia species found.
Tropicalmed 07 00428 g004
Table
Table 1. Mammals infected with Borrelia sp. in the departments of Caldas and Risaralda, Colombia. MHN-UCa-M: mammal collection, Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad de Caldas.
Table 1. Mammals infected with Borrelia sp. in the departments of Caldas and Risaralda, Colombia. MHN-UCa-M: mammal collection, Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad de Caldas.
MunicipalityLocalityHost OrderHost FamilyVoucher Number MHN-UCaHost’s Scientific NameInfected TissueAccession NumberClosest Gen Bank Identity (Gene: Accession Number)Borrelia Typing Database (Locus/Allele)
ManizalesJardín Botánico, Universidad de CaldasChiropteraPhyllostomidaeM 3826Artibeus lituratusBloodOP48044299.64% Borrelia venezuelensis [flaB: MG651650]BORR00725 (flaB)/53
M 3821Artibeus lituratusBloodOP48044195.17%–96.24% Borrelia sp. Macaregua cave [flaB: MT154618]/37
HeartOP480445 /37
KidneyOP480446 /37
LungOP480447 /37
LiverOP480448 /37
M 3820Artibeus lituratusHeartOP48045495.75%–96.61% Borrelia sp. Macaregua cave [flaB: MT154618]/37
KidneyOP480452 /37
LungOP480453 /37
M 3822Artibeus lituratusHeartOP48045794.52%–95.21% Borrelia sp. Macaregua cave [flaB: MT154618]/37
KidneyOP480455 /37
LiverOP480456 /37
M 3825Artibeus lituratusKidneyOP48045896.18% Borrelia sp. Macaregua cave [flaB: MT154618]/37
NorcasiaVereda Las Delicias, Sector La Punta, Río Manso M 3987Artibeus jamaicensisLiverOP48046299.63% Borrelia venezuelensis [flaB: MG651650]/53
ManizalesJardín Botánico, Universidad de Caldas M 3812Carollia brevicaudaLungOP48045198.56% Borrelia sp. Macaregua cave [flaB: MT154618] /37
VillamaríaBosques de la CHEC M 3529Sturnira erythromosLungOP48045096.32% Borrelia sp. Macaregua cave [flaB: MT154618]/37
NorcasiaVereda Las Delicias, Sector La Punta, Río Manso M 3984Platyrrhinus helleriKidneyOP48045999.62% Borrelia venezuelensis [flaB: MG651650]/53
M 3981Mesophylla macconnelliLiverOP48046099.28% Borrelia venezuelensis [flaB: MG651650]/53
Marsella *Rio Cauca, túnel La Mica M 3635Glossophaga soricinaBloodOP48044395.19% Borrelia sp. Macaregua cave [flaB: MT154618]/29
NorcasiaVereda Las Delicias, Sector La Punta, Río Manso EmballonuridaeM 3970Rhynchonycteris nasoLiverOP48046199.65% Borrelia venezuelensis [flaB: MG651650]/53
ManizalesVía Viveros, Ecoparque Los YarumosRodentiaErethizontidaeM 3423Coendou rufescensLiverOP48044499.19% Borrelia turicatae [flaB: MH632129]/53
VillamaríaSector Santa Bárbara, Finca El Edén CricetidaeM 3613Microryzomys altissimusBrainOP48044999.61% Borrelia venezuelensis [flaB: MG651650]/53
M 3616Thomasomys aureusLungOP49140899.64% Borrelia burgdorferi [complete genome: CP002228; flaB: AY374137]/62
MuridaeM 3605Mus musculusBloodOP491407100% Borrelia burgdorferi [complete genome: CP002228; flaB: AY374137]/62
* Mammals infected in the departments of Risaralda, Colombia.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mancilla-Agrono, L.Y.; Banguero-Micolta, L.F.; Ossa-López, P.A.; Ramírez-Chaves, H.E.; Castaño-Villa, G.J.; Rivera-Páez, F.A. Is Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Stricto in South America? First Molecular Evidence of Its Presence in Colombia. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7120428

AMA Style

Mancilla-Agrono LY, Banguero-Micolta LF, Ossa-López PA, Ramírez-Chaves HE, Castaño-Villa GJ, Rivera-Páez FA. Is Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Stricto in South America? First Molecular Evidence of Its Presence in Colombia. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2022; 7(12):428. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7120428

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mancilla-Agrono, Lorys Y., Lizeth F. Banguero-Micolta, Paula A. Ossa-López, Héctor E. Ramírez-Chaves, Gabriel J. Castaño-Villa, and Fredy A. Rivera-Páez. 2022. "Is Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Stricto in South America? First Molecular Evidence of Its Presence in Colombia" Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 7, no. 12: 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7120428

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop -