6
\$\begingroup\$

Preface, why am I asking this question?

Instead of using a passive probe with a ground clip, I want a more "permanent" and reliable connection for my measurements. Note: I'm not talking about RF, just regular measurements you would do with a passive probe.

For this reason I'm considering using a UMCC connector on my PCB, something like this:

enter image description here

Also quoting an answer from "Oscilloscope: when to use coaxial instead of probes?" (emphasis mine):

Basically, when it is possible to use coaxial, use it. Coaxial connectors are more reliable than a probe. With a probe, you need to hook it to a test pin or even sometimes hold it in place. You have a grater risk of slipping off of your test point or getting a dodgy connection. With a probe you also get ground from 'somewhere' but not necessarily at the right place. On a coax, you get ground from the connector, where it should be. (this can matter when propagation times become relevant)

My question:

I really have a hard time finding anything on the question I'm having:

So as far as I know there are 50 Ω and 75 Ω coax cables. I know that this isn't the DC resistance but the characteristic impedance. Now, since I don't want to load my signals with a 50 Ω termination load (which the oscilloscope does when set to a 50 Ω input) I want to have a high impedance input like 1 MΩ or 10 MΩ, but with the coax connection.

Basically, I want to replace the passive probe with a coax, so I get a reliable connection — but what about the impedance of the coax cable? Does it matter for signals that are not RF? Because I can't find anything on that topic, really.

Is it okay to use a 50 Ω coax connection for non-RF signals into a scope with 1 MΩ / 10 MΩ input impedance without a load termination resistor?

My assumption is that it'll be okay since the DC resistance of the coax is minimal.

However, I'd like to have this confirmed by someone who has more experience than me.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Read the first and second answers here for starters. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 5 at 10:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ As mentioned in a comment on one of the answers, they make connectors that mate directly with scope probe tips. I’ve seen them on EVAL boards from chip manufacturers. However, I don’t recall if the ground makes contact too or if it’s just the tip. Anyway, it’s worth looking at since the special coaxial cable your scope probe is made out of is tuned for the high impedance measurements you want to do. \$\endgroup\$
    – Ste Kulov
    Commented Jul 5 at 11:33

4 Answers 4

8
\$\begingroup\$

Yes, you can do it. However.. the capacitive loading is fairly high on small coax cable. Maybe ~100pF per m for 1.13mm cable. So if you connect it to anything with fast-ish edges it will load the source significantly.

A clip-on test point for a 10:1 scope probe would be around an order of magnitude less loading.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Better still, you can also get sockets that mate directly with scope probes and provide both the signal and the ground connection. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dave Tweed
    Commented Jul 5 at 11:22
4
\$\begingroup\$

For a good balance of input impedance and capacitive loading, you can use 50 ohm termination and a series resistor at source end.

For example 950 Ω resistor gives 1:20 attenuation and a consistent 1 kΩ impedance up to hundreds of megahertz.

\$\endgroup\$
3
\$\begingroup\$

The DC resistance of a coax cable is usually somewhere between 0 and 5 Ohms per 1000 meter.

So yes, when you configure your scope to high input impedance, your proposed setup works out fine.

\$\endgroup\$
3
\$\begingroup\$

A passive probe is more than just a 9 MΩ resistor and a piece of coax.

First of all, since both the input of the scope and the coax have significant capacitance, there is a compensating capacitor in parallel with the resistor, usually adjustable. This is why switchable 10:1 / 1:1 probes have such terrible frequency response when in the 1:1 mode. But even in 10:1 mode, there still is a capacitive load on your circuit — but it's a factor of 10 less than 1:1 mode.

Second, in order to deal with the fact that the scope input (when switched to 1 MΩ) is not matched to the coax, the coax itself is actually constructed with a deliberately lossy (resistive) center conductor.

You can't easily deal with the second point, but if you want to do this right, you should at least add a resistor and capacitor to each of your test points in order to create effectively a dedicated 10:1 probe for it.

\$\endgroup\$
8
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for elaborating. If I understand correctly, the second point is talking about putting a 9 MΩ parallel to a capacitor in series with the test point connection and using the scope with 1 MΩ input impedance? \$\endgroup\$
    – Marco
    Commented Jul 5 at 14:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ Well, it's the first point that I made, but in the second and fourth paragraphs. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dave Tweed
    Commented Jul 5 at 14:26
  • \$\begingroup\$ I see. How would I go about choosing/calculating the capacitor value? My assumption is that I'll probably have to match it with the oscilloscope's input capacitance? The scope I'm intending to make the measurements with has a described input capacitance of 13pF. If you could help me with that I'd be very happy. \$\endgroup\$
    – Marco
    Commented Jul 5 at 14:34
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Yes, that's the general idea. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dave Tweed
    Commented Jul 5 at 14:53
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ For future readers and myself, I found some great resources talking about the topic here and here. \$\endgroup\$
    – Marco
    Commented Jul 5 at 15:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.