Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability and validity of PDQ-39: a quality-of-life measure for patients with PD in China

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The syndromes of Parkinson’s disease (PD) have impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQL). The 39-item Parkinson’s disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) was the first specific and a consistent instrument for the evaluation of HRQL in PD patients.

Purpose

To test the reliability and validity of Chinese version PDQ-39.

Methods

Hundred and twenty-six PD without cognitive impairment were enrolled. The Chinese version of SF-36 was used to evaluate the congruent validity of PDQ-39 between related domains. Both PDQ-39 and SF-36 scales were fulfilled by the patients themselves.

Results

Five of eight subscales of PDQ-39 met the acceptable standards of reliability (Cronbach’s α coefficient >0.80), while the other three subscales (cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort) failed to reach the above standards as reported by the others. All the item-to-subscale correlations (range: 0.457–0.887) met the minimal acceptable item convergent validity criterion of 0.40 (P < 0.001). Correlation between PDQ-39 subscales and scales of the SF-36 had high negative correlations with a range of −0.759 to −0.124. Four of them had significant negative correlations (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The Chinese version of PDQ-39 is a reliable and valid instrument for Chinese PD patients. It is recommended as the most appropriate HRQL tool for PD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abbreviations

PDQ-39:

The 39-item Parkinson’s disease questionnaire

SF-36:

Short-form 36-item health survey questionnaire

HRQL:

Health-related quality of life

MMSE:

The mini-mental state examination

UPDRS:

The unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale

PDSI:

The Parkinson’s disease summary index

PDQL:

Parkinson’s disease quality of life questionnaire

PIMS:

Parkinson’s impact scale

NHP:

General Nottingham health profile

SCOPA-PS:

Scales for outcomes in Parkinson’s disease-psychosocial questionnaire

PDQUALIF:

Parkinson’s disease quality of life scale

PLQ:

Parkinson quality of life questionnaire

NMSQuest:

Non-motor symptoms questionnaire

US:

United States

ICC:

The intra-class correlation coefficients

References

  1. Den Oudsten, B. L., Van Heck, G. L., & De Vries, J. (2007). Quality of life and related concepts in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review. Movement Disorders, 22(11), 1528–1537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shibley Rahman, H. J. G., Quinn, Niall. P., & Jahanshahi, Marjan. (2008). Quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: The relative importance of the symptoms. Movement Disorders, 23, 1428–1434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Janca, A. (1999). A report on the WHO working group on Parkinson’s disease. Neuroepidemiology, 18, 236–240.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schindler, J. S., Brown, R., Welburn, P., & Parkes, J. D. (1993). Measuring the quality of life of patients with Parkinson’s disease. In S. Walker & R. Rosser (Eds.). Quality of life assessment (pp. 289–300). Lancaster: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinez-Martin, P., & Frades Payo, B. (1998). Quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: Validation study of the PDQ-39 Spanish version. The Grupo Centro for study of movement disorders. Journal of Neurology, 245(1), S34–S38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peto, V., Jenkinson, C., Fitzpatrick, R., & Greenhall, R. (1995). The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and well being for individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Quality of Life Research, 4(3), 241–248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peto, V., Jenkinson, C., & Fitzpatrick, R. (1998). PDQ-39: A review of the development, validation and application of a Parkinson’s disease quality of life questionnaire and its associated measures. Journal of Neurology, 245(1), S10–S14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jenkinson, C., Fitzpatrick, R., Peto, V., Greenhall, R., & Hyman, N. (1997). The Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39): development and validation of a Parkinson’s disease summary index score. Age and Ageing, 26(5), 353–357.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sullivan, M., Karlsson, J., & Ware, J. (1994). Halsoenkat SF-36. Svensk manual och tolkningsguide SF-36 health survey. Swedish mannual and interpretation guide.

  10. Tsang, K. L., Chi, I., Ho, S. L., Lou, V. W., Lee, T. M., & Chu, L. W. (2002). Translation and validation of the standard Chinese version of PDQ-39: a quality-of-life measure for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders, 17(5), 1036–1040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Luo, N., Tan, L. C., Li, S. C., Soh, L. K., & Thumboo, J. (2005). Validity and reliability of the Chinese (Singapore) version of the Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39). Quality of Life Research, 14(1), 273–279.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma, H. I., Hwang, W. J., & Chen-Sea, M. J. (2005). Reliability and validity testing of a Chinese-translated version of the 39-item Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39). Quality of Life Research, 14(2), 565–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katzman, R., Zhang, M. Y., Ouang Ya, Q., Wang, Z. Y., Liu, W. T., Yu, E., et al. (1988). A Chinese version of the mini-mental state examination; impact of illiteracy in a Shanghai dementia survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 41(10), 971–978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Salmon, D. P., Riekkinen, P. J., Katzman, R., Zhang, M. Y., Jin, H., & Yu, E. (1989). Cross-cultural studies of dementia. A comparison of mini-mental state examination performance in Finland and China. Archives of Neurology, 46(7), 769–772.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, M. Y. (1993). The utilization of scales in the diagnosis of dementia. Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine, 13(6), 337–339.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bushnell, D. M., & Martin, M. L. (1999). Quality of life and Parkinson’s disease: Translation and validation of the US Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39). Quality of Life Research, 8(4), 345–350.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jenkinson, C. (1995). Self reported functioning and well being in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Comparison of the short form health survey (SF-36) and Parkinson disease questionnaire (PDQ-39). Age and Ageing, 24, 505–509.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. de Boer, A. G., Wijker, W., Speelman, J. D., & de Haes, J. C. (1996). Quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease: Development of a questionnaire. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 61(1), 70–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ware, J. E., Jr., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Calne, S. M., Mak, E., Hall, J., Fortin, M. J., King, P., McInnes, G., et al. (2003). Validating a quality-of-life scale in caregivers of patients with Parkinson’s disease: Parkinson’s Impact Scale (PIMS). Advances in Neurology, 91, 115–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hagell, P., Whalley, D., McKenna, S. P., & Lindvall, O. (2003). Health status measurement in Parkinson’s disease: validity of the PDQ-39 and Nottingham Health Profile. Movement Disorders, 18(7), 773–783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carod-Artal, F. J., Martinez-Martin, P., & Vargas, A. P. (2007). Independent validation of SCOPA-psychosocial and metric properties of the PDQ-39 Brazilian version. Movement Disorders, 22(1), 91–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Welsh, M., McDermott, M. P., Holloway, R. G., Plumb, S., Pfeiffer, R., & Hubble, J. (2003). Development and testing of the Parkinson’s disease quality of life scale. Movement Disorders, 18(6), 637–645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marinus, J., Ramaker, C., van Hilten, J. J., & Stiggelbout, A. M. (2002). Health related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review of disease specific instruments. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 72(2), 241–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Auquier, P., Sapin, C., Ziegler, M., Tison, F., Destee, A., Dubois, B., et al. (2002). Validation of the French language version of the Parkinson’s disease questionnaire—PDQ-39. Review of Neurology (Paris), 158(1), 41–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Martinez-Martin, P., Frades Payo, B., Fontan Tirado, C., Martinez Sarries, F. J., Guerrero, M. T., & del Ser Quijano, T. (1997). Assessing quality of life in Parkinson’s disease using the PDQ-39. A pilot study. Neurologia, 12(2), 56–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Souza, R. G., Borges, V., Silva, S. M., & Ferraz, H. B. (2007). Quality of life scale in Parkinson’s disease PDQ-39—(Brazilian Portuguese version) to assess patients with and without levodopa motor fluctuation. Arquivos de Neuropsiquiatr, 65(3B), 787–791.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tan, L. C., Luo, N., Nazri, M., Li, S. C., & Thumboo, J. (2004). Validity and reliability of the PDQ-39 and the PDQ-8 in English-speaking Parkinson’s disease patients in Singapore. Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 10(8), 493–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Martinez-Martin, P., Serrano-Duenas, M., & Vaca-Baquero, V. (2005). Psychometric characteristics of the Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39)–Ecuadorian version. Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 11(5), 297–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Katsarou, Z., Bostantjopoulou, S., Peto, V., Alevriadou, A., & Kiosseoglou, G. (2001). Quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: Greek translation and validation of the Parkinson’s disease questionnaire (PDQ-39). Quality of Life Research, 10(2), 159–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jaeschke, R., Guyatt, G., & Spilker, B. (1990). How to develop and validate a new quality of life instrument. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. New York: Raven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Damiano, A. M., Snyder, C., Strausser, B., & Willian, M. K. (1999). A review of health-related quality-of-life concepts and measures for Parkinson’s disease. Quality of Life Research, 8(3), 235–243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim, M. Y., Dahlberg, A., & Hagell, P. (2006). Respondent burden and patient-perceived validity of the PDQ-39. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 113(2), 132–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support was received from the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, No.2006AA02A408), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, No.2011CB504101), and the Beijing High Standard Health Human Resource Cultural Program in Health System (No.2009-1-12). We thank Dr. Lin-Juan Sun and Dr. Jing–Jing Wu for their help to this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piu Chan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, JL., Chan, P. Reliability and validity of PDQ-39: a quality-of-life measure for patients with PD in China. Qual Life Res 21, 1217–1221 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0026-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0026-1

Keywords

Navigation

-