Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Cancel
5
  • 5
    I read this as Fogg having expected Passepartout at 11:25. Since it's 11:29, Fogg sees Passepartout as being 4 minutes late, rather than his watch. Commented Jul 7 at 12:44
  • 5
    @AmosJoshua - "...who was due at the house between eleven and half-past."
    – Mithical
    Commented Jul 7 at 12:47
  • Aha, well there goes that theory :) Commented Jul 7 at 19:12
  • There is the "No matter", which could mean that the exact number isn't important, the fact that it is different is already an error. But it doesn't look like Phileas Fogg, who insists on exactitude.
    – Florian F
    Commented Jul 7 at 21:43
  • 2
    @AmosJoshua The preceding lines state that the new servant "was due at the house between eleven and half-past" - Passepartout isn't late, his 11:29 arrival is exactly within the expected window. Fogg immediately proceeds by leaving the house for his 11:30 routine; if Passepartout was late, Fogg would already have been gone. Commented Jul 8 at 16:25

-