Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Aug 21;150(4):719-30.
doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.4.719.

Membrane topogenesis of a type I signal-anchor protein, mouse synaptotagmin II, on the endoplasmic reticulum

Affiliations

Membrane topogenesis of a type I signal-anchor protein, mouse synaptotagmin II, on the endoplasmic reticulum

Y Kida et al. J Cell Biol. .

Abstract

Synaptotagmin II is a type I signal-anchor protein, in which the NH(2)-terminal domain of 60 residues (N-domain) is located within the lumenal space of the membrane and the following hydrophobic region (H-region) shows transmembrane topology. We explored the early steps of cotranslational integration of this molecule on the endoplasmic reticulum membrane and demonstrated the following: (a) The translocation of the N-domain occurs immediately after the H-region and the successive positively charged residues emerge from the ribosome. (b) Positively charged residues that follow the H-region are essential for maintaining the correct topology. (c) It is possible to dissect the lengths of the nascent polypeptide chains which are required for ER targeting of the ribosome and for translocation of the N-domain, thereby demonstrating that different nascent polypeptide chain lengths are required for membrane targeting and N-domain translocation. (d) The H-region is sufficiently long for membrane integration. (e) Proline residues preceding H-region are critical for N-domain translocation, but not for ER targeting. The proline can be replaced with amino acid with low helical propensity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
N-glycosylation of mouse Syt II. (A) Domain structure of mouse Syt II and amino acid sequences around the potential glycosylation site within the N-domain. The closed box indicates the H-region. The numbers indicate those of the amino acid residues. The glycosylation site (underlined) was disrupted by a single mutation of T34A (double underlined). (B) The wild-type and mutated molecules were expressed in the reticulocyte lysate cell-free system in the absence (−) or presence (+) of RM. After the translation reaction, an aliquot was treated with EndoH under the denaturing condition (+ lane). (C) Both molecules were expressed in COS7 cells. The cells were pulse-labeled and then the Syt II molecules were immunoprecipitated with rabbit antibody against the C-domain of Syt II. Aliquots of the immunoprecipitants were treated with EndoH (+ lanes).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timing of cotranslational membrane targeting and N-domain translocation. (A) Template DNAs linearized at various sites were transcribed in vitro. The synthesized mRNAs do not possess a termination codon so that the nascent polypeptides remain as peptidyl-tRNA and are not released from the ribosomes. The polypeptide segments within the ribosomes are indicated by closed ovals. The numbers in the names of the constructs correspond to their length. The hatched box indicates the H-region. (B) Glycosylation of the truncated polypeptides in vitro. The mRNAs were translated in vitro in the absence (−) or presence (+) of RM. The translation reaction was terminated by cycloheximide (C) or puromycin (P). Throughout all of the figures, upward and downward arrowheads indicate the unglycosylated and glycosylated polypeptides, respectively. (C) Effect of puromycin on N-domain translocation. After treatment with either cycloheximide (CHX) or puromycin (Puro), glycosylated and unglycosylated forms were quantified by image analysis and the efficiency (%) was calculated by the formula: [glycosylated-form] × 100/[glycosylated-form + unglycosylated forms]. The experiments for each construct were carried out more than three times and the standard deviation is indicated by error bars. (D) Titration of glycosylation efficiency as a function of polypeptide length. The threshold length for glycosylation is estimated to be 127 residues. (E) Syt-125 is bound to membrane in a high-salt–resistant fashion. Translation mixtures were adjusted to a high-salt condition, and then membrane precipitates (P) and supernatants (S) were separated by ultracentrifugation. The total translation products before separation are also shown (T). Where indicated (Puro), polypeptides were released by puromycin from ribosomes before high-salt treatment. (F) Syt-125 is cross-linked with Sec61α. Translation mixtures were treated with heterobifunctional cross-linker (MBS +). After the reactions, aliquots were immunoprecipitated with anti-Sec61α antibody (IP +). Dot indicates the cross-linked polypeptide (lane 5).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Positive charges following the H-region are essential for SA-I topogenesis. (A) Construct in which eight lysine residues were mutated to neutral ones. Potential glycosylation sites are indicated; one within the N-domain and three within the cytoplasmic domain. (B) The mutant was expressed in vitro. After the translation reaction, aliquots were treated with EndoH, and with ProK in the presence (+) or absence (−) of detergent (Triton X-100). One, two, and three dots indicate mono-, di-, and tri-glycosylated polypeptides. Closed and open arrowheads indicate membrane-protected N-domain and C-domain, respectively. An asterisk indicates glycosylated ProK-resistant core fragment derived from C-domain. (C) Immunoprecipitation of proteinase K fragments with site-specific antibodies. After the proteinase K treatment in the presence (+) or absence (−) of the detergent, peptide fragments were immunoprecipitated with anti–N-domain (IP, N) or anti–C-domain (IP, C) antibody. The total (IP, −) and the immunoprecipitated polypeptides were subjected for SDS-PAGE.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Structural requirements of the H-region for SA-I topogenesis. (A) Effect of serial deletions of the H-region. The glycosylation efficiencies were determined as described in the legend to Fig. 2. (B) The effect of shuffling of the H-region of Syt II with that of the rat cytochrome P450(2C11). The sequences of cytochrome P450(2C11) are underlined.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Proline residues between the N-domain and the H-region are critical for SA-I topogenesis. (A) Proline residues were mutated into alanine residues as indicated. (B) The mutants were expressed in a cell-free system in the presence of RM. The upward and downward arrowheads indicate the unglycosylated and glycosylated polypeptides, respectively. In the right panel, the glycosylation efficiency of each construct was determined as described in the legend to Fig. 2. (C) The wild-type and AAA mutant were expressed in the cultured cells. The cells were pulse-labeled and Syt II molecules were immunoprecipitated. Aliquots were further treated by EndoH. (D) Membrane anchoring of the AAA mutant. RM was added during translation reaction (Co) or after the termination of the translation with puromycin (Post). In the latter case (Post), the reaction was continued for a further 30 min at 30°C. The translation products were extracted with 0.1 M Na2CO3, and then membrane-bound (M) and soluble (S) fractions were separated by the alkaline floatation procedure. Half equivalents of the total reactions are also shown (T/2). (E) Membrane targeting of AAA mutant of 125 residues. The truncated mRNAs encoding 105 and 125 residues of the AAA mutant were translated in the presence of RM and separated into membrane-bound (P) and supernatant (S) fractions under the high-salt condition. (F) Nascent polypeptide of 125 residues of AAA mutant was cross-linked with Sec61α. After each of the truncated mRNA was translated in the presence of RM, cross-linking (MBS) and immunoprecipitation (IP) were performed as in the legend to Fig. 2.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of partial deletions of the N-domain and replacement of the third proline on N-domain translocation of the AAA mutant. (A) N-domain of the proline mutant (AAA) was partially deleted as indicated. The mutated proline residues and deleted amino acid residues are indicated by a bold letter and a dashed line, respectively. The sequence predicted to form helix is indicated by double underlining. The mutants were expressed in a cell-free system in the presence (+) or absence (−) of RM. The upward and downward arrowheads indicate the unglycosylated and glycosylated polypeptides, respectively. Glycosylation efficiencies were determined as described in the legend to Fig. 2. (B) Prediction of secondary structure of the boundary between N-domain and H-region. H, S, and T correspond to the regions predicted as helix, sheet, and turn, respectively. H-region is indicated by underlines. (C) The third proline residue was exchanged with amino acids with various helical propensities. The glycosylation efficiency was determined as described in the legend to Fig. 2.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Working model for topogenesis of the Syt II molecule. Syt-105 is not targeted to the membrane (stage a). Syt-120 and Syt-125 are targeted to the membrane but are not sufficient in length for N-domain translocation (stage b). These are efficiently chased with puromycin to be glycosylated. For completion of the N-domain translocation, further chain elongation is essential so that the positively charged residues beyond the H-region emerge from the ribosome (stage c). Proline residues between the N-domain and the H-region are critical between stage b and stage d to break continuous helix. The threshold of the length for correct integration is 127 residues. The numbers indicate the numbers of amino acid residues of the nascent polypeptide chains.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahn K., Szczesna-Skorupa E., Kemper B. The amino-terminal 29 amino acids of cytochrome P450 2C1 are sufficient for retention in the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:18726–18733. - PubMed
    1. Anderson D.J., Blobel G. Immunoprecipitation of proteins from cell-free translations. Methods Enzymol. 1983;96:111–120. - PubMed
    1. Belin D., Bost S., Vassalli J.-D., Strub K. A two-step recognition of signal sequences determines the translocation efficiency of proteins. EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J. 1996;15:468–478. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borel A.C., Simon S.M. Biogenesis of polytopic membrane proteinsmembrane segments assemble within translocation channels prior to membrane integration. Cell. 1996;85:379–389. - PubMed
    1. Chapman E.R., Blasi J., An S., Brose N., Johnston P.A., Sudhof T.C., Jahn R. Fatty acylation of synaptotagmin in PC12 cells and synaptosomes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996;225:326–332. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

-