Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents
- PMID: 11394563
- DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200131060-00004
Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents
Abstract
Chronic disease risk factors, including a sedentary lifestyle, may be present even in young children, suggesting that early prevention programmes may be critical to reducing the rates of chronic disease. Accurate assessment of physical activity in children is necessary to identify current levels of activity and to assess the effectiveness of intervention programmes designed to increase physical activity. This article summarises the strengths and limitations of the methods used to evaluate physical activity in children and adolescents. MEDLINE searches and journal article citations were used to locate 59 articles that validated physical activity measurement methods in children and adolescents. Only those methods that were validated against a more stringent measure were included in the review. Based on the definition of physical activity as any bodily movement resulting in energy expenditure (EE), direct observation of the individual's movement should be used as the gold standard for physical activity research. The doubly labelled water technique and indirect calorimetry can also be considered criterion measures for physical activity research, because they measure EE, a physiologic consequence closely associated with physical activity. Devices such as heart rate monitors, pedometers and accelerometers have become increasingly popular as measurement tools for physical activity. These devices reduce the subjectivity inherent in survey methods and can be used with large groups of individuals. Heart rate monitoring is sufficiently valid to use in creating broad physical activity categories (e.g. highly active, somewhat active, sedentary) but lacks the specificity needed to estimate physical activity in individuals. Laboratory and field validations of pedometers and accelerometers yield relatively high correlations using oxygen consumption (r = 0.62 to 0.93) or direct observation (r = 0.80 to 0.97) as criterion measures, although, they may not be able to capture all physical activity. Physical activity has traditionally been measured with surveys and recall instruments. These techniques must be used cautiously in a paediatric population that has difficulty recalling such information. Still, some studies have reported 73.4% to 86.3% agreement between these instruments and direct observation. Future investigations of physical activity instruments should validate the novel instrument against a higher standard. Additional studies are needed to investigate the possibility of improving the accuracy of measurement by combining 2 or more techniques. The accurate measurement of physical activity is critical for determining current levels of physical activity, monitoring compliance with physical activity guidelines, understanding the dose-response relationship between physical activity and health and determining the effectiveness of intervention programmes designed to improve physical activity.
Similar articles
-
[Patients on the move: validated methods to quantify physical activity].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;159:A8709. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015. PMID: 25990331 Review. Dutch.
-
How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness?Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005 Apr;12(2):102-14. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000161551.73095.9c. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005. PMID: 15785295 Review.
-
Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity.Sports Med. 2002;32(12):795-808. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232120-00004. Sports Med. 2002. PMID: 12238942 Review.
-
Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children.Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000 Jun;71(2 Suppl):S59-73. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000. PMID: 10925827 Review.
-
Measurement of physical activity in children with particular reference to the use of heart rate and pedometry.Sports Med. 1997 Oct;24(4):258-72. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199724040-00004. Sports Med. 1997. PMID: 9339494 Review.
Cited by
-
Health-Related Physical Fitness Evaluation in HIV-Diagnosed Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 25;21(5):541. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050541. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38791753 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Energy Expenditure Prediction from Accelerometry Data Using Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel). 2024 Apr 14;24(8):2520. doi: 10.3390/s24082520. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38676136 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a smartwatch algorithm for differentiating physical activity intensity in health monitoring.Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 25;14(1):9530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59602-6. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38664457 Free PMC article.
-
Accelerometry-assessed daily physical activity and compliance with recommendations in Spanish children: importance of physical education classes and vigorous intensity.PeerJ. 2024 Mar 8;12:e16990. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16990. eCollection 2024. PeerJ. 2024. PMID: 38468640 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal changes in device-measured physical activity from childhood to young adulthood: the PANCS follow-up study.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Mar 6;21(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01578-7. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024. PMID: 38448922 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical