The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates
- PMID: 12044129
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00009
The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates
Erratum in
- Ann Intern Med 2002 Jul 16;137(2):147
Abstract
Background: The data used by the U.S. Institute of Medicine to estimate deaths from medical errors come from a study that relied on nurse and physician reviews of medical records to detect the errors.
Objective: To measure the reliability of medical record review for detecting adverse events and negligent adverse events.
Design: Medical record review.
Setting: Hospitalizations in Utah and Colorado in 1992.
Measurements: After three independent reviews of 500 medical records, the following were measured: reliability and the effect of varying criteria for reviewer confidence in and reviewer agreement about the presence of adverse events.
Results: For agreements in judgments of adverse events among the three sets of reviews, the kappa statistics ranged from 0.40 to 0.41 (95% CIs ranged from 0.30 to 0.51) for adverse events and from 0.19 to 0.23 (CIs, 0.05 to 0.37) for negligent adverse events. Rates for adverse events and for negligent adverse events varied substantially depending on the degree of agreement and the level of confidence that was required among reviewers.
Conclusion: Estimates of adverse event rates from medical record review, including those reported by the Institute of Medicine in its 2000 report on medical errors, are highly sensitive to the degree of consensus and confidence among reviewers.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. The reliability of medical record review for estimating the frequency of medical mistakes.Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 4;136(11):I40. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00004. Ann Intern Med. 2002. PMID: 12044144 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The Korea National Patient Safety Incidents Inquiry Survey: Feasibility of Medical Record Review for Detecting Adverse Events in Regional Public Hospitals.J Patient Saf. 2022 Aug 1;18(5):389-395. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000964. Epub 2022 Jan 24. J Patient Saf. 2022. PMID: 35067623 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Measurement of patient safety: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of adverse event detection with record review.BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 22;6(8):e011078. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011078. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27550650 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Adverse events and preventable adverse events in children.Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):155-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0410. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 15629994
-
Summaries for patients. The reliability of medical record review for estimating the frequency of medical mistakes.Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 4;136(11):I40. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00004. Ann Intern Med. 2002. PMID: 12044144 No abstract available.
-
Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado.Med Care. 2000 Mar;38(3):261-71. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200003000-00003. Med Care. 2000. PMID: 10718351
Cited by
-
Complications in Interventional Radiology: the role of clinical governance and iterative hospital systems in quality improvement.CVIR Endovasc. 2023 Aug 5;6(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s42155-023-00388-5. CVIR Endovasc. 2023. PMID: 37542625 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Why identifying adverse events in paediatric emergency care matters.BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Oct 19;31(11):776-778. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-014939. BMJ Qual Saf. 2022. PMID: 35863876 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Validation of an electronic trigger to measure missed diagnosis of stroke in emergency departments.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2202-2211. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab121. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021. PMID: 34279630 Free PMC article.
-
A prospective evaluation of inter-rater agreement of routine medical records audits at a large general hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 10;20(1):638. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05495-w. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32650769 Free PMC article.
-
Structured Chart Review: Assessment of a Structured Chart Review Methodology.Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Jan;10(1):61-69. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2019-0225. Hosp Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 31879317 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources