Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Feb;47(2):332-41.
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.10.027.

Mendelian randomization: a new approach to studying epidemiology in ESRD

Carmine Zoccali  1 , Alessandra Testa, Belinda Spoto, Giovanni Tripepi, Francesca Mallamaci
Affiliations
Review

Mendelian randomization: a new approach to studying epidemiology in ESRD

Carmine Zoccali et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Feb.

Abstract

Associations between environmental exposures and disease in epidemiological studies often are confounded and may result in erroneous interpretations. The random assortment of genes from parents to offspring at gamete formation--Mendelian randomization--is emerging as a useful method for studying the nature (causal or not) of environmental exposures. This occurs because the association between a disease and a polymorphism that mimics the biological link between a given exposure and the same disease is unaffected by the reverse causation that may complicate the interpretation of observational studies. Thus, similarly to randomized trials, association studies between gene polymorphisms with a well-established function may be useful for excluding confounding as an explanation for a given epidemiological relationship. The rationale behind this concept is that transmission of genes occurs in a random way; therefore, offspring have an equal chance of inheriting either of the 2 alleles that their parents have at any particular locus, a phenomenon independent from environmental factors. This is similar to the construct of randomized trials, in which randomization is expected to produce similar distributions of measured and unmeasured confounders between treated and untreated (control) groups. The equivalence between random assortment of alleles and random assignment of interventions in randomized studies is particularly useful because it may give a clue for interpreting associations that may be produced as both the effect of a gene or result of an environmental exposure. Examples are provided about the use of this concept to elucidate paradoxical inverse associations in epidemiological studies in the general and end-stage renal disease populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

LinkOut - more resources

-