Interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain: evidence-based practice guidelines
- PMID: 16850041
Interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain: evidence-based practice guidelines
Abstract
Background: The lifetime prevalence of spinal pain has been reported as 54% to 80%, with as many as 60% of patients continuing to have chronic pain five years or longer after the initial episode. Spinal pain is associated with significant economic, societal, and health impact. Available evidence documents a wide degree of variance in the definition and the practice of interventional pain management.
Objective: To develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain, with utilization of all types of evidence, applying an evidence-based approach, with broad representation of specialists from academic and clinical practices.
Design: A systematic review of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions applied in managing chronic spinal pain by a policy committee. Design consisted of formulation of essentials of guidelines and a series of potential evidence linkages representing conclusions, and statements about relationships between clinical interventions and outcomes.
Methods: The elements of the guideline preparation process included literature searches, literature synthesis, systematic review, consensus evaluation, open forum presentation, formal endorsement by the Board of Directors of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP), and blinded peer review. Methodologic quality evaluation criteria utilized included AHRQ criteria, QUADAS criteria, and Cochrane review criteria. The designation of levels of evidence was from Level I (conclusive), Level II (strong), Level III (moderate), Level IV (limited), to Level V (indeterminate).
Results: The accuracy of facet joint nerve blocks was strong in the diagnosis of lumbar and cervical facet joint pain, whereas, it was moderate in the diagnosis of thoracic facet joint pain. The evidence was strong for lumbar discography, whereas, the evidence was limited for cervical and thoracic discography. The evidence was moderate for transforaminal epidural injections or selective nerve root blocks in the preoperative evaluation of patients with negative or inconclusive imaging studies. The evidence was moderate for sacroiliac joint injections in the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain. The evidence for therapeutic lumbar intraarticular facet injections of local anesthetics and steroids was moderate for short-term improvement and limited for long-term improvement, whereas, it was negative for cervical facet joint injections. The evidence for lumbar and cervical medial branch blocks was moderate. The evidence for medial branch neurotomy was moderate to strong for relief of chronic low back and neck pain. The evidence for caudal epidural steroid injections was strong for short-term relief and moderate for long-term relief in managing chronic low back and radicular pain, and limited in managing pain of postlumbar laminectomy syndrome. The evidence for interlaminar epidural steroid injections was strong for short-term relief and limited for long-term relief in managing lumbar radiculopathy, whereas, for cervical radiculopathy the evidence was moderate. The evidence for transforaminal epidural steroid injections was strong for short-term and moderate for long-term improvement in managing lumbar nerve root pain, whereas, it was moderate for cervical nerve root pain and limited for lumbar post laminectomy syndrome and spinal stenosis. The evidence for percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis was strong. For spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis, the evidence was strong for short-term relief and moderate for long-term relief. For sacroiliac intraarticular injections, the evidence was moderate for short-term relief and limited for long-term relief. The evidence for radiofrequency neurotomy for sacroiliac joint pain was indeterminate. The evidence for intradiscal electrothermal therapy was strong for short-term relief and moderate for long-term relief in managing chronic discogenic low back pain, whereas, for nucleoplasty, the evidence was limited. The evidence for spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome and complex regional pain syndrome was strong for short-term relief and moderate for long-term relief. The evidence for implantable intrathecal infusion systems was moderate to strong.
Conclusion: These guidelines included the evaluation of evidence for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in managing chronic spinal pain and recommendations for managing spinal pain. However, these guidelines do not constitute inflexible treatment recommendations. These guidelines do not represent "a standard of care".
Similar articles
-
An update of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in chronic spinal pain. Part II: guidance and recommendations.Pain Physician. 2013 Apr;16(2 Suppl):S49-283. Pain Physician. 2013. PMID: 23615883
-
Comprehensive review of therapeutic interventions in managing chronic spinal pain.Pain Physician. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(4):E123-98. Pain Physician. 2009. PMID: 19668281 Review.
-
Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain.Pain Physician. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(4):699-802. Pain Physician. 2009. PMID: 19644537
-
Reassessment of evidence synthesis of occupational medicine practice guidelines for interventional pain management.Pain Physician. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):393-482. Pain Physician. 2008. PMID: 18690276 Review.
-
Interventional techniques: evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain.Pain Physician. 2007 Jan;10(1):7-111. Pain Physician. 2007. PMID: 17256025
Cited by
-
Synergistic Benefits of Motor Control Exercises and Balance Training in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Life (Basel). 2023 Nov 27;13(12):2258. doi: 10.3390/life13122258. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38137859 Free PMC article.
-
A Proposed Personalized Spine Care Protocol (SpineScreen) to Treat Visualized Pain Generators: An Illustrative Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Reoperations between Targeted Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Surgery, Minimally Invasive TLIF and Open Laminectomy.J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 29;12(7):1065. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071065. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35887562 Free PMC article.
-
Morphometric Analysis of the Cervical Canal Using Computed Tomography Scan Among Patients With Neck Pain in North India.Cureus. 2022 May 29;14(5):e25466. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25466. eCollection 2022 May. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35800813 Free PMC article.
-
The immediate effect of a single session of pain neuroscience education on pain and the autonomic nervous system in subjects with persistent pain, a pilot study.PeerJ. 2021 May 31;9:e11543. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11543. eCollection 2021. PeerJ. 2021. PMID: 34131526 Free PMC article.
-
Paraplegia after transforaminal epidural steroid injection in a patient with severe lumbar disc herniation - A case report.Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Jan;16(1):96-102. doi: 10.17085/apm.20068. Epub 2021 Jan 21. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021. PMID: 33472291 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources