Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Oct;52(10):1083-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.07.008. Epub 2006 Sep 5.

Octopamine and tyramine influence the behavioral profile of locomotor activity in the honey bee (Apis mellifera)

Brendon L Fussnecker  1 , Brian H Smith, Julie A Mustard
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Octopamine and tyramine influence the behavioral profile of locomotor activity in the honey bee (Apis mellifera)

Brendon L Fussnecker et al. J Insect Physiol. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

The biogenic amines octopamine and tyramine are believed to play a number of important roles in the behavior of invertebrates including the regulation of motor function. To investigate the role of octopamine and tyramine in locomotor behavior in honey bees, subjects were injected with a range of concentrations of octopamine, tyramine, mianserin or yohimbine. Continuous observation of freely moving worker bees was used to examine the effects of these treatments on the amount of time honey bees spent engaged in different locomotor behaviors such as walking, grooming, fanning and flying. All treatments produced significant shifts in behavior. Decreases in time spent walking and increases in grooming or stopped behavior were observed for every drug. However, the pattern of the shift depended on drug, time after injection and concentration. Flying behavior was differentially affected with increases in flying seen in octopamine treated bees, whereas those receiving tyramine showed a decrease in flying. Taken together, these data provide evidence that octopamine and tyramine modulate motor function in the honey bee perhaps via interaction with central pattern generators or through effects on sensory perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The effects of octopamine on honey bee behavioral profiles. The percent of time subjects spent engaged in each behavior is shown for treatment with each concentration of octopamine. Treatment consisted of injection with 2 μl of 5 × 10−2, 5 × 10−3, 5 × 10−4, 5 × 10−5 M octopamine or buffer alone. Data represent the average of 11 to 13 independent observations and error bars indicate the SEM. The interval of time post injection is indicated. A) Behavioral profiles are significantly different among bees given different treatments at the 35–40 and the 40–45 min intervals. B) Time spent flying versus time after injection for bees treated with octopamine. This is the same data included in the behavioral profiles in A shown on a separate graph to aid comparison. For intervals in which significant differences in behavioral profiles occurred, asterisks indicate significant differences in time spent in that behavior by bees treated with the indicated concentration of octopamine versus buffer controls (t test: *p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The effects of tyramine on honey bee behavioral profiles. The percent of time subjects spent engaged in each behavior is shown for treatment with each concentration of tyramine. Treatment consisted of injection with 2 μl of 5 × 10−2, 5 × 10−3, 5 × 10−4, 5 × 10−5 M tyramine or buffer alone. Data represent the average of 10 to 14 independent observations and error bars indicate the SEM. The interval of time post injection is indicated. A) Behavioral profiles are significantly different among bees given different treatments at the 35–40, 40–45 and the 45–50 min intervals. B) Time spent flying versus time after injection for bees treated with tyramine. This is the same data included in the behavioral profiles in A shown on a separate graph to aid comparison. For intervals in which significant differences in behavioral profiles occurred, asterisks indicate significant differences in time spent in that behavior by bees treated with the indicated concentration of tyramine versus buffer controls (t test: * p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The effects of the octopamine receptor antagonist mianserin on honey bee behavioral profiles. The percent of time subjects spent engaged in each behavior is shown for treatment with each concentration of mianserin. Treatment consisted of injection with 2 μl of 5 × 10−3, 5 × 10−4, 5 × 10−5, 5 × 10−6 M mianserin or buffer alone. Data represent the average of 10 independent observations and error bars indicate the SEM. The interval of time post injection is indicated. A) Behavioral profiles are significantly different among bees given different treatments at the 30–35 and the 40–45 min intervals. B) Time spent flying versus time after injection for bees treated with mianserin. This is the same data included in the behavioral profiles in A shown on a separate graph to aid comparison. For intervals in which significant differences in behavioral profiles occurred, asterisks indicate significant differences in time spent in that behavior by bees treated with the indicated concentration of mianserin versus buffer controls (t test: * p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The effects of the tyramine receptor antagonist yohimbine on honey bee behavioral profiles. The percent of time subjects spent engaged in each behavior is shown for treatment with each concentration of yohimbine. Treatment consisted of injection with 2 μl of 5 × 10−3, 5 × 10−4, 5 × 10−5, 5 × 10−6 M yohimbine or buffer alone. Data represent the average of 12 to 14 independent observations and error bars indicate the SEM. The interval of time post injection is indicated. A) Behavioral profiles are significantly different among bees given different treatments at the 45–50 min interval. B) Time spent flying versus time after injection for bees treated with yohimbine. This is the same data included in the behavioral profiles in A shown on a separate graph to aid comparison. For intervals in which significant differences in behavioral profiles occurred, asterisks indicate significant differences in time spent in that behavior by bees treated with the indicated concentration of yohimbine versus buffer controls (t test: * p ≤ 0.05).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Alkema MJ, Hunter-Ensor M, Ringstad N, Horvitz HR. Tyramine functions independently of octopamine in the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system. Neuron. 2005;46:247–260. - PubMed
    1. Balfanz S, Strünker T, Frings S, Baumann A. A family of octopamine receptors that specifically induce cyclic AMP production or Ca2+ release in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Neurochem. 2005;93:440–451. - PubMed
    1. Barron AB, Schulz DJ, Robinson GE. Octopamine modulates responsiveness to foraging-related stimuli in honey bees (Apis mellifera) Journal of Comparative Physiology. 2002;188A:603–610. - PubMed
    1. Bischof LJ, Enan EE. Cloning, expression and functional analysis of an octopamine receptor from Periplaneta americana. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2004;34:511–521. - PubMed
    1. Blenau W, May T, Erber J. Characterization of [H-3]LSD binding to a serotonin-sensitive site in honeybee (Apis mellifera) brain. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B. 1995;112:377–384.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

-