Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug 1;75(3):530-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.04.022. Epub 2007 May 4.

Preconditioning and postconditioning: the essential role of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore

Affiliations

Preconditioning and postconditioning: the essential role of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore

Shiang Y Lim et al. Cardiovasc Res. .

Abstract

Objective: The opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) at the time of myocardial reperfusion is a critical determinant of cell death. Emerging studies suggest that suppression of mPTP opening may underlie the cardioprotection elicited by both ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and postconditioning (IPost). To further evaluate the role of the mPTP in cardioprotection, we hypothesized that hearts deficient in cyclophilin-D (CYP-D-/-), a key component of the mPTP, will be resistant to cardioprotection conferred by ischemic and pharmacological preconditioning and postconditioning.

Methods and results: Male/female wild type or CYP-D-/- mice were subjected to 30 min of ischemia and 120 min of reperfusion. In wild type mice subjected to in vivo myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, a significant reduction in myocardial infarct size was observed with the following treatments (n>/=6/group; P<0.05): (1) IPC (28+/-4% vs. 46.2+/-4% in control); (2) Diazoxide (5 mg/kg) pre-treatment (26.4+/-3% vs. 54+/-10% in vehicle control); (3) IPost-1 or IPost-2, three or six 10-s cycles of ischemia-reperfusion (27.2+/-3% and 32+/-4%, respectively vs. 46.2+/-4% in control); (4) Bradykinin (40 mug/kg) (28.3+/-1% vs. 48+/-4% in vehicle control); (5) cyclosporin-A (10 mg/kg) (32.3+/-3% vs. 48+/-4% in vehicle control) (6) sanglifehrin-A (25 mg/kg) (29.3+/-3% vs. 48+/-4% in vehicle control). Interestingly, however, no infarct-limiting effects were demonstrated in CYP-D-/- mice with the same treatment protocols: (27.9+/-5% in control vs. 31.2+/-7% with IPC, 30.2+/-5% with IPost-1, 24.7+/-8% with IPost-2; 30.1+/-4% in vehicle control vs. 26.4+/-7% with diazoxide; 24.6+/-4% in vehicle control vs. 24.9+/-5% with bradykinin, 26.8+/-7% with cyclosporin-A, 32.5+/-6% with sanglifehrin-A: n>/=6/group: P>0.05).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the mPTP plays a critical role in the cardioprotection elicited by ischemic and pharmacological preconditioning and postconditioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Experimental protocols for wild type and CYP-D-/- mice subjected to 30 min LAD coronary artery occlusion followed by 120 min of reperfusion. The arrow indicates the administration of treatment. Dzx, diazoxide; CsA, cyclosporin-A; SfA, sanglifehrin-A.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CYP-D-/- mice are resistant to IPC and IPost. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a % of the area at risk (AAR) in wild-type (A) or CYP-D-/- (B) mice subjected to control, IPC, IPost-1, or IPost-2 (n=6-9/group). *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs. control.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CYP-D-/- mice are resistant to IPC with 45 min of ischemia. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a % of the area at risk (AAR) in wild-type or CYP-D-/- mice subjected to control or IPC with 30 min or 45 min of ischemia (n=6-9/group). *P<0.05.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
CYP-D-/- mice are resistant to pharmacological preconditioning and postconditioning. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a % of the area at risk (AAR) in wild-type (A) or Cyp-D-/- (B) mice receiving vehicle (VC) or diazoxide pretreatment or vehicle (VC), cyclosporin-A (CsA), sanglifehrin-A (SfA), bradykinin (Brady) at time of reperfusion (n=6-8/group). *P<0.01 vs. control.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 1986;74:1124–36. - PubMed
    1. Zhao ZQ, Corvera JS, Halkos ME, Kerendi F, Wang NP, Guyton RA, et al. Inhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285:H579–88. - PubMed
    1. Staat P, Rioufol G, Piot C, Cottin Y, Cung TT, L’Huillier I, et al. Postconditioning the human heart. Circulation. 2005;112:2143–8. - PubMed
    1. Griffiths EJ, Halestrap AP. Mitochondrial non-specific pores remain closed during cardiac ischaemia, but open upon reperfusion. Biochem J. 1995;307(Pt 1):93–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hausenloy DJ, Duchen MR, Yellon DM. Inhibiting mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening at reperfusion protects against ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;60:617–25. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

-