Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991:440:697-722.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018731.

Mechanisms of inhibition in cat visual cortex

N J Berman  1 , R J Douglas, K A Martin, D Whitteridge
Affiliations

Mechanisms of inhibition in cat visual cortex

N J Berman et al. J Physiol. 1991.

Abstract

1. Neurones from layers 2-6 of the cat primary visual cortex were studied using extracellular and intracellular recordings made in vivo. The aim was to identify inhibitory events and determine whether they were associated with small or large (shunting) changes in the input conductance of the neurones. 2. Visual stimulation of subfields of simple receptive fields produced depolarizing or hyperpolarizing potentials that were associated with increased or decreased firing rates respectively. Hyperpolarizing potentials were small, 5 mV or less. In the same neurones, brief electrical stimulation of cortical afferents produced a characteristic sequence of a brief depolarization followed by a long-lasting (200-400 ms) hyperpolarization. 3. During the response to a stationary flashed bar, the synaptic activation increased the input conductance of the neurone by about 5-20%. Conductance changes of similar magnitude were obtained by electrically stimulating the neurone. Neurones stimulated with non-optimal orientations or directions of motion showed little change in input conductance. 4. These data indicate that while visually or electrically induced inhibition can be readily demonstrated in visual cortex, the inhibition is not associated with large sustained conductance changes. Thus a shunting or multiplicative inhibitory mechanism is not the principal mechanism of inhibition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:574-91 - PubMed
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1966 May;29(3):369-81 - PubMed
    1. Biophys J. 1962 Mar;2(2 Pt 2):145-67 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1988 Dec;406:443-68 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1988 May;399:657-75 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

-