Sex-biased evolutionary forces shape genomic patterns of human diversity
- PMID: 18818765
- PMCID: PMC2538571
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000202
Sex-biased evolutionary forces shape genomic patterns of human diversity
Abstract
Comparisons of levels of variability on the autosomes and X chromosome can be used to test hypotheses about factors influencing patterns of genomic variation. While a tremendous amount of nucleotide sequence data from across the genome is now available for multiple human populations, there has been no systematic effort to examine relative levels of neutral polymorphism on the X chromosome versus autosomes. We analyzed approximately 210 kb of DNA sequencing data representing 40 independent noncoding regions on the autosomes and X chromosome from each of 90 humans from six geographically diverse populations. We correct for differences in mutation rates between males and females by considering the ratio of within-human diversity to human-orangutan divergence. We find that relative levels of genetic variation are higher than expected on the X chromosome in all six human populations. We test a number of alternative hypotheses to explain the excess polymorphism on the X chromosome, including models of background selection, changes in population size, and sex-specific migration in a structured population. While each of these processes may have a small effect on the relative ratio of X-linked to autosomal diversity, our results point to a systematic difference between the sexes in the variance in reproductive success; namely, the widespread effects of polygyny in human populations. We conclude that factors leading to a lower male versus female effective population size must be considered as important demographic variables in efforts to construct models of human demographic history and for understanding the forces shaping patterns of human genomic variability.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2538571/bin/pgen.1000202.g001.gif)
![Figure 2](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2538571/bin/pgen.1000202.g002.gif)
Similar articles
-
Reduced representation genome sequencing suggests low diversity on the sex chromosomes of tonkean macaque monkeys.Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Sep;31(9):2425-40. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu197. Epub 2014 Jul 1. Mol Biol Evol. 2014. PMID: 24987106
-
Contrasting Patterns of Genomic Diversity Reveal Accelerated Genetic Drift but Reduced Directional Selection on X-Chromosome in Wild and Domestic Sheep Species.Genome Biol Evol. 2018 Apr 1;10(5):1282-1297. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy085. Genome Biol Evol. 2018. PMID: 29790980 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in life history and population size can explain the relative neutral diversity levels on X and autosomes in extant human populations.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):20063-20069. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915664117. Epub 2020 Aug 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020. PMID: 32747577 Free PMC article.
-
Looking for signatures of sex-specific demography and local adaptation on the X chromosome.Genome Biol. 2010 Jan 28;11(1):203. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-1-203. Genome Biol. 2010. PMID: 20236443 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The different levels of genetic diversity in sex chromosomes and autosomes.Trends Genet. 2009 Jun;25(6):278-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2009.04.005. Epub 2009 May 27. Trends Genet. 2009. PMID: 19481288 Review.
Cited by
-
Identity-by-descent-based estimation of the X chromosome effective population size with application to sex-specific demographic history.G3 (Bethesda). 2023 Sep 30;13(10):jkad165. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad165. G3 (Bethesda). 2023. PMID: 37497617 Free PMC article.
-
Methods for Assessing Population Relationships and History Using Genomic Data.Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2023 Aug 25;24:305-332. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-111422-025117. Epub 2023 May 23. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2023. PMID: 37220313 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Substantial but Misunderstood Human Sexual Dimorphism Results Mainly From Sexual Selection on Males and Natural Selection on Females.Front Psychol. 2022 May 17;13:859931. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859931. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35664212 Free PMC article.
-
A meta-analysis of the association between male dimorphism and fitness outcomes in humans.Elife. 2022 Feb 18;11:e65031. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65031. Elife. 2022. PMID: 35179485 Free PMC article.
-
A neutral model for the loss of recombination on sex chromosomes.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Aug 30;376(1832):20200096. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0096. Epub 2021 Jul 12. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34247504 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hedrick PW. Sex: differences in mutation, recombination, selection, gene flow, and genetic drift. Evolution. 2007;61:2750–2771. - PubMed
-
- Petit E, Balloux F, Excoffier L. Mammalian population genetics: why not Y? Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17:28–33.
-
- Pilkington MM, Wilder JA, Mendez FL, Cox MP, Woerner A, et al. Contrasting signatures of population growth for mitochondrial DNA and Y chromosomes among human populations in Africa. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:517–525. - PubMed
-
- Wilder JA, Kingan SB, Mobasher Z, Pilkington MM, Hammer MF. Global patterns of human mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome structure are not influenced by higher migration rates of females versus males (vol 36, pg 1122, 2004). Nat Genet. 2004;36:1238–1238. - PubMed
-
- Wilder JA, Mobasher Z, Hammer MF. Genetic evidence for unequal effective population sizes of human females and males. Mol Biol Evol. 2004;21:2047–2057. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources