Energy balance, physical activity, and cancer risk
- PMID: 19107429
- DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-492-0_3
Energy balance, physical activity, and cancer risk
Abstract
This chapter posits that cancer is a complex and multifactorial process as demonstrated by the expression and production of key endocrine and steroid hormones that intermesh with lifestyle factors (physical activity, body size, and diet) in combination to heighten cancer risk. Excess weight has been associated with increased mortality from all cancers combined and for cancers of several specific sites. The prevalence of obesity has reached epidemic levels in many parts of the world; more than 1 billion adults are overweight with a body mass index (BMI) exceeding 25. Overweight and obesity are clinically defined indicators of a disease process characterized by the accumulation of body fat due to an excess of energy intake (nutritional intake) relative to energy expenditure (physical activity). When energy intake exceeds energy expenditure over a prolonged period of time, the result is a positive energy balance (PEB), which leads to the development of obesity. This physical state is ideal for intervention and can be modulated by changes in energy intake, expenditure, or both. Nutritional intake is a modifiable factor in the energy balance-cancer linkage primarily tested by caloric restriction studies in animals and the effect of energy availability. Restriction of calories by 10 to 40% has been shown to decrease cell proliferation, increasing apoptosis through anti-angiogenic processes. The potent anticancer effect of caloric restriction is clear, but caloric restriction alone is not generally considered to be a feasible strategy for cancer prevention in humans. Identification and development of preventive strategies that "mimic" the anticancer effects of low energy intake are desirable. The independent effect of energy intake on cancer risk has been difficult to estimate because body size and physical activity are strong determinants of total energy expenditure. The mechanisms that account for the inhibitory effects of physical activity on the carcinogenic process are reduction in fat stores, activity related changes in sex-hormone levels, altered immune function, effects in insulin and insulin-like growth factors, reduced free radical generation, and direct effect on the tumor. Epidemiologic evidence posits that the cascade of actions linking overweight and obesity to carcinogenesis are triggered by the endocrine and metabolic system. Perturbations to these systems result in the alterations in the levels of bioavailable growth factors, steroid hormones, and inflammatory markers. Elevated serum concentrations of insulin lead to a state of hyperinsulinemia. This physiological state causes a reduction in insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins and promotes the synthesis and biological activity of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, which regulates cellular growth in response to available energy and nutrients from diet and body reserves. In vitro studies have clearly established that both insulin and IGF-I act as growth factors that promote cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis. Insulin also affects on the synthesis and biological availability of the male and female sex steroids, including androgens, progesterone, and estrogens. Experimental and clinical evidence also indicates a central role of estrogens and progesterone in regulating cellular differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis induction. Hyperinsulinemia is also associated with alterations in molecular systems such as endogenous hormones and adipokines that regulate inflammatory responses. Obesity-related dysregulation of adipokines has the ability to contribute to tumorigenesis and tumor invasion via metastatic potential. Given the substantial level of weight gain in industrialized countries in the last two decades, there is great interest in understanding all of the mechanisms by which obesity contributes to the carcinogenic process. Continued focus must be directed to understanding the various relationships between specific nutrients and dietary components and cancer cause and prevention. A reductionist approach is not sufficient for the basic biological mechanisms underlying the effect of diet and physical activity on cancer. The joint association between energy balance and cancer risk are hypothesized to share the same underlying mechanisms, the amplification of chemical mediators that modulate cancer risk depending on the responsiveness to those hormones to the target tissue of interest. Disentangling the connection between obesity, the insulin-IGF axis, endogenous hormones, inflammatory markers, and their molecular interaction is vital.
Similar articles
-
Energy intake, physical activity, energy balance, and cancer: epidemiologic evidence.Methods Mol Biol. 2009;472:191-215. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-492-0_8. Methods Mol Biol. 2009. PMID: 19107434 Review.
-
Vegan proteins may reduce risk of cancer, obesity, and cardiovascular disease by promoting increased glucagon activity.Med Hypotheses. 1999 Dec;53(6):459-85. doi: 10.1054/mehy.1999.0784. Med Hypotheses. 1999. PMID: 10687887
-
Roles for insulin-like growth factor-1 in mediating the anti-carcinogenic effects of caloric restriction.J Nutr Health Aging. 1999;3(2):92-101. J Nutr Health Aging. 1999. PMID: 10885804 Review.
-
Body composition and time course changes in regional distribution of fat and lean tissue in unselected cancer patients on palliative care--correlations with food intake, metabolism, exercise capacity, and hormones.Cancer. 2005 May 15;103(10):2189-98. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21013. Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15822132
-
Dietary intake, physical activity and energy expenditure of Malaysian adolescents.Singapore Med J. 2006 Jun;47(6):491-8. Singapore Med J. 2006. PMID: 16752017
Cited by
-
mTOR pathway candidate genes and energy intake interaction on breast cancer risk in Black women from the Women's Circle of Health Study.Eur J Nutr. 2023 Sep;62(6):2593-2604. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03176-y. Epub 2023 May 20. Eur J Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37209192
-
Causal effects of physical activity on the risk of overall ovarian cancer: A Mendelian randomization study.Digit Health. 2023 Mar 15;9:20552076231162988. doi: 10.1177/20552076231162988. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 36937699 Free PMC article.
-
Combined Associations of Physical Activity and Particulate Matter With Subsequent Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among 5-Year Cancer Survivors.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 May 3;11(9):e022806. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022806. Epub 2022 May 2. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35491990 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic significance of circulating insulin growth-like factor 1 and insulin growth-like factor binding protein 3 in renal cell carcinoma patients.Am J Cancer Res. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):852-860. eCollection 2022. Am J Cancer Res. 2022. PMID: 35261807 Free PMC article.
-
Increased Use of Porch or Backyard Nature during COVID-19 Associated with Lower Stress and Better Symptom Experience among Breast Cancer Patients.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 28;18(17):9102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179102. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34501691 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources