Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study
- PMID: 19282436
- PMCID: PMC2659290
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b814
Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units: multinational prospective study
Abstract
Objective: To assess on a multinational level the frequency, characteristics, contributing factors, and preventive measures of administration errors in parenteral medication in intensive care units.
Design: Observational, prospective, 24 hour cross sectional study with self reporting by staff.
Setting: 113 intensive care units in 27 countries.
Participants: 1328 adults in intensive care.
Main outcome measures: Number of errors; impact of errors; distribution of error characteristics; distribution of contributing and preventive factors.
Results: 861 errors affecting 441 patients were reported: 74.5 (95% confidence interval 69.5 to 79.4) events per 100 patient days. Three quarters of the errors were classified as errors of omission. Twelve patients (0.9% of the study population) experienced permanent harm or died because of medication errors at the administration stage. In a multiple logistic regression with patients as the unit of analysis, odds ratios for the occurrence of at least one parenteral medication error were raised for number of organ failures (odds ratio per increase of one organ failure: 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.34); use of any intravenous medication (yes v no: 2.73, 1.39 to 5.36); number of parenteral administrations (per increase of one parenteral administration: 1.06, 1.04 to 1.08); typical interventions in patients in intensive care (yes v no: 1.50, 1.14 to 1.96); larger intensive care unit (per increase of one bed: 1.01, 1.00 to 1.02); number of patients per nurse (per increase of one patient: 1.30, 1.03 to 1.64); and occupancy rate (per 10% increase: 1.03, 1.00 to 1.05). Odds ratios for the occurrence of parenteral medication errors were decreased for presence of basic monitoring (yes v no: 0.19, 0.07 to 0.49); an existing critical incident reporting system (yes v no: 0.69, 0.53 to 0.90); an established routine of checks at nurses' shift change (yes v no: 0.68, 0.52 to 0.90); and an increased ratio of patient turnover to the size of the unit (per increase of one patient: 0.73, 0.57 to 0.93).
Conclusions: Parenteral medication errors at the administration stage are common and a serious safety problem in intensive care units. With the increasing complexity of care in critically ill patients, organisational factors such as error reporting systems and routine checks can reduce the risk for such errors.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
-
Parenteral drug errors. Reported error rates are likely to be underestimation.BMJ. 2009 May 6;338:b1814. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1814. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19420039 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Medication Errors in Pediatrics: Proposals to Improve the Quality and Safety of Care Through Clinical Risk Management.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 14;8:814100. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.814100. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35096903 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reducing medication errors in critical care: a multimodal approach.Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Sep 1;6:117-26. doi: 10.2147/CPAA.S48530. eCollection 2014. Clin Pharmacol. 2014. PMID: 25210478 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Safety climate reduces medication and dislodgement errors in routine intensive care practice.Intensive Care Med. 2013 Mar;39(3):391-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2764-0. Epub 2012 Dec 7. Intensive Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23223821
-
Errors in administration of parenteral medications are a serious safety problem in intensive care units.Aust Crit Care. 2009 Aug;22(3):141-3. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2009.06.002. Aust Crit Care. 2009. PMID: 19595608
-
Errors in preparation and administration of intravenous medications in the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital: an observational study.Aust Crit Care. 2008 May;21(2):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2007.10.004. Epub 2008 Apr 2. Aust Crit Care. 2008. PMID: 18387813
Cited by
-
Impact of organizational justice and manager's mental health on staff nurses' affective commitment: A multilevel analysis of the work environment of hospital nurses in Japan-Part II (WENS-J-II).Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023 Jun 3;5:100137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100137. eCollection 2023 Dec. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2023. PMID: 38746553 Free PMC article.
-
Prescription patterns in an intensive care unit of COVID-19 patients in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study.Health Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 16;6(11):e1711. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1711. eCollection 2023 Nov. Health Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 38028685 Free PMC article.
-
Co-administration of Intravenous Drugs: Rapidly Troubleshooting the Solid Form Composition of a Precipitate in a Multi-drug Mixture Using On-Site Raman Spectroscopy.Mol Pharm. 2023 Jun 5;20(6):2853-2863. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00983. Epub 2023 May 11. Mol Pharm. 2023. PMID: 37167030 Free PMC article.
-
Medication errors and associated factors among pediatric inpatients in public hospitals of gamo zone, southern Ethiopia.Heliyon. 2023 Apr 11;9(4):e15375. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15375. eCollection 2023 Apr. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 37123938 Free PMC article.
-
Patient safety culture in Austria and recommendations of evidence-based instruments for improving patient safety.PLoS One. 2022 Oct 17;17(10):e0274805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274805. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36251643 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sheldon T. Dutch study shows that 40% of adverse incidents in hospital are avoidable. BMJ 2007;334 925. 10.1136/bmj.39199.498137.DB. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, Badihi Y, Biesky M, Sprung CL, et al. A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1995;23:294-300. - PubMed
-
- Rothschild JM, Landrigan CP, Cronin JW, Kaushal R, Lockley SW, Burdick E, et al. The critical care safety study: the incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Crit Care Med 2005;33:1694-700. - PubMed
-
- Valentin A, Capuzzo M, Guidet B, Moreno RP, Dolanski L, Bauer P, et al. Patient safety in intensive care: results from the multinational sentinel events evaluation (SEE) study. Intensive Care Med 2006;32:1591-8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical