Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb 15;171(4):479-87.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp393. Epub 2009 Dec 21.

Comparing 3 dietary pattern methods--cluster analysis, factor analysis, and index analysis--With colorectal cancer risk: The NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study

Jill Reedy  1 , Elisabet Wirfält, Andrew Flood, Panagiota N Mitrou, Susan M Krebs-Smith, Victor Kipnis, Douglas Midthune, Michael Leitzmann, Albert Hollenbeck, Arthur Schatzkin, Amy F Subar
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing 3 dietary pattern methods--cluster analysis, factor analysis, and index analysis--With colorectal cancer risk: The NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study

Jill Reedy et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

The authors compared dietary pattern methods-cluster analysis, factor analysis, and index analysis-with colorectal cancer risk in the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-AARP Diet and Health Study (n = 492,306). Data from a 124-item food frequency questionnaire (1995-1996) were used to identify 4 clusters for men (3 clusters for women), 3 factors, and 4 indexes. Comparisons were made with adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals, distributions of individuals in clusters by quintile of factor and index scores, and health behavior characteristics. During 5 years of follow-up through 2000, 3,110 colorectal cancer cases were ascertained. In men, the vegetables and fruits cluster, the fruits and vegetables factor, the fat-reduced/diet foods factor, and all indexes were associated with reduced risk; the meat and potatoes factor was associated with increased risk. In women, reduced risk was found with the Healthy Eating Index-2005 and increased risk with the meat and potatoes factor. For men, beneficial health characteristics were seen with all fruit/vegetable patterns, diet foods patterns, and indexes, while poorer health characteristics were found with meat patterns. For women, findings were similar except that poorer health characteristics were seen with diet foods patterns. Similarities were found across methods, suggesting basic qualities of healthy diets. Nonetheless, findings vary because each method answers a different question.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Kant AK. Dietary patterns and health outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104(4):615–635. - PubMed
    1. Newby PK, Muller D, Tucker KL. Associations of empirically derived eating patterns with plasma lipid biomarkers: a comparison of factor and cluster analysis methods. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(3):759–767. - PubMed
    1. Fung TT, Hu FB, Barbieri RL, et al. Dietary patterns, the Alternate Healthy Eating Index and plasma sex hormone concentrations in postmenopausal women. Int J Cancer. 2007;121(4):803–809. - PubMed
    1. Nettleton JA, Steffen LM, Schulze MB, et al. Associations between markers of subclinical atherosclerosis and dietary patterns derived by principal components analysis and reduced rank regression in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(6):1615–1625. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wirfält E, Midthune D, Reedy J, et al. Associations between food patterns defined by cluster analysis and colorectal cancer incidence in the NIH–AARP Diet and Health Study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(6):707–717. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

-