Cost-effectiveness analysis of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in Spain: results for the non-squamous histology population
- PMID: 20113499
- PMCID: PMC2841662
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-26
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in Spain: results for the non-squamous histology population
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness evaluation of pemetrexed compared to docetaxel in the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for patients with predominantly non-squamous histology in the Spanish healthcare setting.
Methods: A Markov model was designed consisting of stable, responsive, progressive disease and death states. Patients could also experience adverse events as long as they received chemotherapy. Clinical inputs were based on an analysis of a phase III clinical trial that identified a statistically significant improvement in overall survival for non-squamous patients treated with pemetrexed compared with docetaxel. Costs were collected from the Spanish healthcare perspective.
Results: Outcomes of the model included total costs, total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total life years gained (LYG) and total progression-free survival (PFS). Mean survival was 1.03 years for the pemetrexed arm and 0.89 years in the docetaxel arm; QALYs were 0.52 compared to 0.42. Per-patient lifetime costs were 34677 euros and 32343 euros, respectively. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were 23967 euros per QALY gained and 17225 euros per LYG.
Conclusions: Pemetrexed as a second-line treatment option for patients with a predominantly non-squamous histology in NSCLC is a cost-effective alternative to docetaxel according to the 30000 euros /QALY threshold commonly accepted in Spain.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2841662/bin/1471-2407-10-26-1.gif)
![Figure 2](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2841662/bin/1471-2407-10-26-2.gif)
![Figure 3](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2841662/bin/1471-2407-10-26-3.gif)
![Figure 4](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2841662/bin/1471-2407-10-26-4.gif)
![Figure 5](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2841662/bin/1471-2407-10-26-5.gif)
![Figure 6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2841662/bin/1471-2407-10-26-6.gif)
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of maintenance pemetrexed in patients with advanced nonsquamous-cell lung cancer from the perspective of the Swiss health care system.Value Health. 2012 Jan;15(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.1737. Epub 2011 Oct 22. Value Health. 2012. PMID: 22264973
-
Costs and clinical outcomes among patients with second-line non-small cell lung cancer in the outpatient community setting.J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Jan;7(1):212-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182307f33. J Thorac Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22124474
-
Cost-effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: an economic, randomized, prospective, multicenter phase III trial comparing docetaxel and pemetrexed: the GFPC 05-06 study.J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Jan;6(1):161-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318200f4c1. J Thorac Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21150465 Clinical Trial.
-
Pemetrexed for the maintenance treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(Suppl. 2):33-9. doi: 10.3310/hta14suppl2/05. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 21047489 Review.
-
Pemetrexed for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14 Suppl 1:47-53. doi: 10.3310/hta14Suppl1/07. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 20507803 Review.
Cited by
-
The Pharmacoeconomic Benefits of Pemetrexed Dose Individualization in Patients With Lung Cancer.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 May;111(5):1103-1110. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2529. Epub 2022 Feb 21. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022. PMID: 35048355 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Licensed Drugs Used for Previously Treated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Negative Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Dec;39(12):1153-1174. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00859-5. Clin Drug Investig. 2019. PMID: 31583605
-
Cost-Effectiveness of an Individualized First-Line Treatment Strategy Offering Erlotinib Based on EGFR Mutation Testing in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients in Germany.Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Nov;33(11):1215-28. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0305-8. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015. PMID: 26081300
-
Cost-effectiveness of para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.J Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(3):171-8. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.3.171. Epub 2015 Apr 17. J Gynecol Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25925292 Free PMC article.
-
(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography accuracy in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer: review and cost-effectiveness.Radiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:135934. doi: 10.1155/2014/135934. Epub 2014 Nov 5. Radiol Res Pract. 2014. PMID: 25431665 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hérnandez IS, Alonso JL, Sánchez CA. [Epidemiology of lung cancer in Spain and forecast for the future] Arch Bronconeumol. 2006;42:594–599. - PubMed
-
- Cayuela A, Rodríguez-Domínguez S, López-Campos JL, Vigil E, Otero R. [Lung cancer mortality trends in Spain between 1980 and 2005] Arch Bronconeumol. 2008;44:70–74. - PubMed
-
- Alonso-Fernández MA, García-Clemente M, Escudero-Bueno C. Grupo ASTURPAR (Sociedad Asturiana de Patología del Aparato Respiratorio) del Cáncer del Pulmón (GACP) [Characteristics of lung cancer in a region in northern Spain] Arch Bronconeumol. 2005;41:478–483. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical