Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;59(2):75-81.
doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.59.2.75. Epub 2010 Aug 20.

The effect of propofol on emergence agitation in children receiving sevoflurane for adenotonsillectomy

Affiliations

The effect of propofol on emergence agitation in children receiving sevoflurane for adenotonsillectomy

Cheol Jin Lee et al. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The administration of a single dose of propofol is reported to be effective in decreasing the incidence and severity of emergence agitation (EA) in children following sevoflurane anesthesia. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical usefulness of a single dose of propofol 1 mg/kg at the end of adenotonsillectomy for reducing the incidence of EA after sevoflurane anesthesia.

Methods: Ninety children, aged 3-8 years, undergoing adenotonsillectomy were randomized into two groups: the propofol group (n = 45) and the saline group (n = 45), of which 88 children completed the study. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane 2-2.5 vol% and nitrous oxide/oxygen (50%/50%). At the completion of adenotonsillectomy, the propofol group patients were given 1 mg/kg of propofol and the saline group patients were given saline 0.1 ml/kg in the same volume. The incidence of EA was assessed with Aono's four point scale and the severity of EA was assessed with pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) scale at 5 min (T5), 15 min (T15) and 30 min (T30) after emergence.

Results: Of the 88 patients, the incidence of EA at T5, T15 and T30 was 61.4%, 27.3%, and 4.5% in the propofol group while in the saline group was 68.2%, 29.5%, and 9.1%, respectively. The incidence and severity of EA were not found to be significantly different between the two groups, but the scales in each group decreased significantly over time.

Conclusions: The administration of propofol 1 mg/kg at the end of surgery did not have any significant effect in reducing the incidence and severity of EA in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy under sevoflurane anesthesia.

Keywords: Child; Emergence agitation; Propofol; Sevoflurane.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Aono's four point scale at 5 (T5), 15 (T15) and 30 (T30) minutes after emergence. Aono's four point scales significantly decreased over time (P < 0.001) and there was a statistically significant time effect in each group (*P < 0.001 in the propofol group and P < 0.001 in the saline group). Group effect averaged across time did not show significant difference (P = 0.465) and the interaction effect of group and time was also not statistically significant (P = 0.196). Values are presented as mean ± SEM.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) scale at 5 (T5), 15 (T15), and 30 (T30) minutes after emergence. PAED scales significantly decreased over time (P < 0.001) and there was a statistically significant time effect in each group (*P < 0.001 in the propofol group, P < 0.001 in the saline group). Group effect averaged across time did not show significant difference (P = 0.709) and the interaction effect of group and time was not statistically significant (P = 0.093). Values are presented as mean ± SEM.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Children and infants postoperative pain (CHIPP) scale at 5 (T5), 15 (T15), and 30 (T30) minutes after emergence. CHIPP scales significantly decreased by time (P < 0.001) and there was a statistically significant time effect in each group (*P < 0.001 in propofol group, P < 0.001 in saline group). Group effect averaged across time did not show significant difference (P = 0.428) and the interaction effect of group and time was not statistically significant (P = 0.312). Values are presented as mean ± SEM.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Ramsay sedation scale at 5 (T5), 15 (T15), and 30 (T30) minutes after emergence. Ramsay sedation scales did not show significant difference over time (P = 0.436). Group effect and interaction effect of group and time were not statistically significant (P = 0.116 and 0.679). Values are presented as mean ± SEM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lerman J. Sevoflurane in pediatric anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:S4–S10. - PubMed
    1. Aono J, Ueda W, Mamiya K, Takimoto E, Manabe M. Greater incidence of delirium during recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia in preschool boys. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:1298–1300. - PubMed
    1. Kwak HJ, Kim JY, Kim JH, Kim YS, Park SY. The effect of ketamine and fentanyl on the incidence of emergence agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia in children undergoing tonsillectomy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2005;49:502–506.
    1. De grood PM, Coenen LG, Van Egmond J, Booij LH, Crul JF. Propofol emulsion for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. A combined technique of general and regional aneshtsia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1987;31:219–223. - PubMed
    1. Uezono S, Goto T, Terui K, Ichinose F, Ishguro Y, Nakata Y, et al. Emergence agitation after sevoflurane versus propofol in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:563–566. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

-