Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 29;6(4):e19364.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019364.

Interaction of bestrophin-1 and Ca2+ channel β-subunits: identification of new binding domains on the bestrophin-1 C-terminus

Affiliations

Interaction of bestrophin-1 and Ca2+ channel β-subunits: identification of new binding domains on the bestrophin-1 C-terminus

Vladimir M Milenkovic et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Bestrophin-1 modulates currents through voltage-dependent L-type Ca(2+) channels by physically interacting with the β-subunits of Ca(2+) channels. The main function of β-subunits is to regulate the number of pore-forming Ca(V)-subunits in the cell membrane and modulate Ca(2+) channel currents. To understand the influence of full-length bestrophin-1 on β-subunit function, we studied binding and localization of bestrophin-1 and Ca(2+) channel subunits, together with modulation of Ca(V)1.3 Ca(2+) channels currents. In heterologeous expression, bestrophin-1 showed co-immunoprecipitation with either, β3-, or β4-subunits. We identified a new highly conserved cluster of proline-rich motifs on the bestrophin-1 C-terminus between amino acid position 468 and 486, which enables possible binding to SH3-domains of β-subunits. A bestrophin-1 that lacks these proline-rich motifs (ΔCT-PxxP bestrophin-1) showed reduced efficiency to co-immunoprecipitate with β3 and β4-subunits. In the presence of ΔCT-PxxP bestrophin-1, β4-subunits and Ca(V)1.3 subunits partly lost membrane localization. Currents from Ca(V)1.3 subunits were modified in the presence of β4-subunit and wild-type bestrophin-1: accelerated time-dependent activation and reduced current density. With ΔCTPxxP bestrophin-1, currents showed the same time-dependent activation as with wild-type bestrophin-1, but the current density was further reduced due to decreased number of Ca(2+) channels proteins in the cell membrane. In summary, we described new proline-rich motifs on bestrophin-1 C-terminus, which help to maintain the ability of β-subunits to regulate surface expression of pore-forming Ca(V) Ca(2+)-channel subunits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Interaction between pore-forming CaV1.3 and auxiliary β-subunits of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels.
1A: Left panel: CHO cells were transfected with CaV1.3-GFP fusion construct and β3-subunits, precipitated with antibodies against β3-subunits and blotted for CaV1.3 protein. Proteins precipitated using antibodies against GFP were positively stained with antibodies against CaV1.3 indicating identification of CaV1.3 subunits. Right two panels: CHO cells transfected with CaV1.3 and β3-subunits; CaV1.3 was immunoprecipitated and blotted for β3-subunits. Control experiment: precipitation using anti-β3-antibody and blot stained against β3-subunit. (L  =  lysate, 10% of total protein; IP  =  immunoprecipitation) 1B: ARPE-19 cells transfected with β3-subunit (green) and CaV1.3 (red). The merged picture shows co-localization of β3-subunits and CaV1.3. On the right: fluorescence profile showing subcellular protein distribution. 1C: To quantify plasma membrane localization, pixel analysis was performed for edge detection to calculate surface expression (data are mean ± SEM; n = 3). Scale bar represents 10 µm.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Subcellular localization of heterologously expressed CaV1.3, β-subunits of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and bestrophin-1:
ARPE-19 cells were transfected with: β3-subunits and bestrophin-1, CaV1.3, β3 or β4-subunits and bestrophin-1, and human P2Y2-His6 receptor. 2A: Cells transfected with β3-subunit (green) and bestrophin-1 (red). Yellow colour in the merged picture indicates interaction of both proteins. On the right: fluorescence profiles showing subcellular protein distribution. 2B: Cells transfected with β3-subunit (green), bestrophin-1 (red), and Cav1.3 subunit (blue). White colour in the merged picture suggests co-localization of all three proteins. On the right: fluorescence profiles showing subcellular protein distribution. 2C: Cells transfected with β4-subunit (green), bestrophin-1 (red), and Cav1.3 subunit (blue). White colour in the merged picture suggests co-localization of all three proteins. On the right: fluorescence profiles showing subcellular protein distribution. 2D: Human P2Y2-His6 receptor which shows plasma membrane localization as a control. Note: cells which express CaV1.3 and β-subunits always appear in a more spherical shape and do not remain flat due to the expression of the large L-type channel subunits. The smaller P2Y2-receptor did not change the cell shape. 2E: Relative surface expression quantified by edge detection analysis (data are mean ± SEM; n = 3). (*  =  p<0.05 for bestrophin-1; #  =  p<0.05 for β3-subunits, unpaired t-test) Scale bar represents 10 µm.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Detection of interaction sites between β-subunits and bestrophin-1.
3A: Bestrophin-1 construct used in this study and alignment of amino acid sequences of the C-terminus of the bestrophin-1 from different species (Boxes: transmembrane domains). Two among vertebrate species highly conserved clusters of proline-rich motifs (PxxP) could be detected. In the ΔCTPxxP mutant form, PxxP motifs between amino acid 468 to 486 were removed with unchanged recognition sites for the anti bestrophin-1 antibody. 3B: HEK-293 cells were transfected with β3-subunits together with bestrophin-1 or ΔCTPxxP constructs. Proteins were precipitated using anti-bestrophin-1 antibody and blots were visualized for anti-β3-subunit to show co-immunoprecipitation. 3C: HEK-293 cells were transfected with His-tagged β4-subunits together with bestrophin-1 wild type or ΔCTPxxP constructs. Proteins were precipitated using anti-His antibody and the blots were visualized with anti-bestrophin-1 antibody to show co-immunoprecipitation. 3D: Relative co-immunoprecipitation of β3-subunits with either wild-type or ΔCTPxxP bestrophin-1: efficiency was measured by densitometry (n = 5). 3E: Relative co-immunoprecipitation of β4-subunits with either wild-type or ΔCTPxxP bestrophin-1 (depicted n = 3). (L  =  lysate; IP  =  immunoprecipitation; NB  =  not bound). The following species abbreviations were used: Hs, Homo sapiens, Mm, Macaca mulatta, Bt, Bos taurus, Ms, Mus musculus, Xt, Xenopus tropicalis, Fr, Fugu rubripes, and Ci, Ciona intestinalis.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Complex formation of CaV1.3, β4-subunits and bestrophin-1.
HEK cells were transfected with CaV1.3, His-tagged β4-subunits, bestrophin-1 or ΔCTPxxP bestrophin-1. Immunoprecipitation was performed using anti-CaV1.3 antibodies, precipitates were analyzed by Western blot. 4A: Transfection: CaV1.3 and bestrophin-1. Blot staining with anti-CaV1.3 antibody to show efficient precipitation of CaV1.3 subunits. 4B: Transfection: CaV1.3 and bestrophin-1. Blot staining with anti-bestrophin-1 antibody showing no co-precipitation of CaV1.3 subunits with bestrophin-1. 4C: Transfection: CaV1.3 and ΔCTPxxP bestrophin-1. Blot staining with anti-bestrophin-1 antibody showing no co-precipitation of CaV1.3 subunits with ΔCTPxxP bestrophin-1. 4D: Transfection: CaV1.3, His-tagged β4-subunits and bestrophin-1. Blot staining with anti-His antibody showing co-precipitation of CaV1.3 subunits with β4-subunits. 4E:Transfection: CaV1.3, His-tagged β4-subunits and bestrophin-1. Blot staining with anti-bestrophin-1 antibody showing indirect co-precipitation of CaV1.3 subunits with bestrophin-1. 4F: Transfection: CaV1.3, His-tagged β4-subunits and ΔCTPxxP bestrophin-1. Blot staining with anti-His antibody showing co-precipitation of CaV1.3 subunits with β4-subunits. 4G: Transfection: CaV1.3, His-tagged β4-subunits and ΔCTPxxP bestrophin-1. Blot staining with anti-bestrophin-1 showing indirect co-precipitation of CaV1.3 subunits with ΔCTPxxP bestrophin-1. (L  =  lysate; IP  =  immunoprecipitation; NB  =  not bound)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Patch-Clamp analysis of CaV1.3/β4 currents under influence of bestrophin-1.
5A: Whole cell Ba2+-currents (lower panel) measured from CHO cells expressing CaV1.3, β4-, α2δ1-subunits. Currents were elicited by a series of 9 voltage-steps of 10 mV increasing amplitude and 50 ms duration from a holding potential of -70 mV (upper panel). 5B: Gating currents: Currents elicited by the electrical stimulation as shown in 5A in the same cell after switching to Co2+ containing bath solution. 5C: Plot of normalized gating currents to the membrane voltages of the electrical stimulation (mean ± SEM, n = 3). 5D: Comparison of the ionic current density of L-type currents from heterologously expressed Ca2+ channel proteins and different bestrophins measured at +20 mV (note: the values are close to those we have published but represent a different set of data). 5E: Comparison of the gating current density in the presence of 10 mM Co2+ from heterologously expressed Ca2+ channel proteins and different bestrophins measured at +20 mV. 5F: Normalized current/voltage plots of L-Type currents either in the absence, presence of bestrophin-1 or the ΔCTPxxP mutant bestrophin-1, fit by Boltzmann equation. 5G: Comparison of the voltages of half maximal activation obtained from Boltzmann fits of the curves in Fig. 5F. 5H: Whole cell Ba2+-currents measured from CHO cells expressing either CaV1.3, β4-, α2δ1 subunits or CaV1.3, β4-, α2δ1 subunits plus wt-bestrophin-1. Currents were elicited by a voltage-jump from -70 mV to +20 mV. The recording shows the currents normalized to their maximal amplitude for comparison. 5I: Comparison of the time-dependent activation of L-type currents from different heterologously expressed Ca2+ channel proteins and bestrophins measured as time constant from single-exponential fit of the currents (note: the values are close to those we have published in but represent a different set of data). (*  =  p<0.05; **  =  p<0.01, unpaired t-test; n depicts the number of experiments)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Subcellular localization of Ca2+ channel subunits and bestrophin-1 in cells used for patch-clamp analysis.
6A: Confocal pictures of CHO cells expressing wt-bestrophin-1, β4-subunit, α2δ1-subunit and CaV1.3. The merged picture and the fluorescence profiles measured along the red line (right panel) indicate the presence of β4-subunit, CaV1.3 and wt-bestrophin-1 in the cell membrane. 6B: Confocal pictures of CHO cells expressing ΔCTPxxP bestrophin-1, β4-subunit, α2δ1-subunit and CaV1.3. The merged picture and the fluorescence profiles measured along the red line (right panel) indicate the presence of β4-subunit, CaV1.3 and ΔCTPxxP bestrophin-1 in the cell plasma. 6C: Confocal pictures of CHO cells expressing ΔCTPxxP bestrophin-1 and P2Y2 receptor. The merged picture and the fluorescence profiles measured along the red line (right panel) indicate the presence of ΔCTPxxP bestrophin-1 in the cell plasma whereas the P2Y receptor appears in the cell membrane. 6D: Relative surface expression quantified by edge detection analysis (data are mean ± SEM; n = 3). (*  =  p<0.05; **  =  p<0.01, unpaired t-test) Scale bar represents 10 µm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hartzell HC, Qu Z, Yu K, Xiao Q, Chien LT. Molecular physiology of bestrophins: multifunctional membrane proteins linked to best disease and other retinopathies. Physiol Rev. 2008;88:639–672. - PubMed
    1. Burgess R, Millar ID, Leroy BP, Urquhart JE, Fearon IM, et al. Biallelic mutation of BEST1 causes a distinct retinopathy in humans. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82:19–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenthal R, Bakall B, Kinnick T, Peachey N, Wimmers S, et al. Expression of bestrophin-1, the product of the VMD2 gene, modulates voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in retinal pigment epithelial cells. FASEB J. 2006;20:178–180. - PubMed
    1. Yu K, Xiao Q, Cui G, Lee A, Hartzell HC. The best disease-linked Cl- channel hBest1 regulates Ca V 1 (L-type) Ca2+ channels via src-homology-binding domains. J Neurosci. 2008;28:5660–5670. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reichhart N, Milenkovic VM, Halsband CA, Cordeiro S, Strauss O. Effect of bestrophin-1 on L-type Ca(2+) channel activity depends on the Ca(2+) channel beta-subunit. Exp Eye Res. 2010;91:630–639. - PubMed
-