Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 15:75:12-19.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.049. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

Targeted transcranial direct current stimulation for rehabilitation after stroke

Jacek P Dmochowski  1 , Abhishek Datta  2 , Yu Huang  3 , Jessica D Richardson  4 , Marom Bikson  3 , Julius Fridriksson  4 , Lucas C Parra  5
Affiliations

Targeted transcranial direct current stimulation for rehabilitation after stroke

Jacek P Dmochowski et al. Neuroimage. .

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is being investigated as an adjunctive technique to behavioral rehabilitation treatment after stroke. The conventional "dosage", consisting of a large (25 cm(2)) anode over the target with the cathode over the contralateral hemisphere, has been previously shown to yield broadly distributed electric fields whose intensities at the target region are less than maximal. Here, we report the results of a systematic targeting procedure with small "high-definition" electrodes that was used in preparation for a pilot study on 8 stroke patients with chronic aphasia. We employ functional and anatomical magnetic resonance imagery (fMRI/MRI) to define a target and optimize (with respect to the electric field magnitude at the target) the electrode configuration, respectively, and demonstrate that electric field strengths in targeted cortex can be substantially increased (63%) over the conventional approach. The optimal montage exhibits significant variation across subjects as well as when perturbing the target location within a subject. However, for each displacement of the target co-ordinates, the algorithm is able to determine a montage which delivers a consistent amount of current to that location. These results demonstrate that MRI-based models of current flow yield maximal stimulation of target structures, and as such, may aid in reliably assessing the efficacy of tDCS in neuro-rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The optimized electrode montages for all subjects. Left: Anatomical MRI depicting lesion anatomy and the location of the peri-lesional target (orange circle). Right: optimal montages with anodes (cathodes) marked in red (black). The approximate location of the target, projected onto the scalp, is indicated with an ‘x’ and resides in the left temporal lobe for all aphasic subjects. The locations of both the anodes and cathodes are non-trivial, subject-dependent, and thus cannot be intuitively predicted from target location alone.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conventional (1st and 3rd columns) and optimized (2nd and 4th columns) electric fields for all subjects. The direction (size) of the overlaid arrows depict the direction (magnitude) of the attained electric field. With the conventional design, the large electrode area and idiosyncratic head anatomy lead to moderate electric field intensities at the target (open circle). Meanwhile, the optimized design steers the applied current to the target, resulting in a marked increase in the electric field strength at the target.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evaluating the sensitivity of montage optimization. The depicted montages are the optimal solutions averaged across all nodes in a 3 mm vicinity of the physiological target. The values listed above each averaged montage refers to the corresponding electric field intensities (mean ± standard deviation) achieved in the 3 mm neighborhood of probed targets. Electrodes whose applied currents are close to ± 1mA are reliably selected regardless of the precise target location. Values close to zero indicate that this location is seldom selected. Small variations of the target node have a marked effect on the location of the optimally selected electrodes. However, the resulting electric field magnitude at the target node is robust to these movements of the optimal montage.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Conventional versus optimized tDCS: (A) Electric field magnitudes achieved at the target during conventional and optimized stimulation: the optimized design delivers 64% more current (averaged across subjects). (B) Accuracy (relative to baseline) on a word-naming task after conventional and optimized tDCS. Subjects improve by 8 % after the conventional and by 11 % after the optimized treatment. Due to the large intersubject variability in the responses to optimized tDCS, this behavioral improvement was not found to be statistically significant.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ambrus GG, Antal A, Paulus W. Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes. Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2011;122:803–807. - PubMed
    1. Baker JM, Rorden C, Fridriksson J. Using transcranial Direct-Current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke. 2010;41:1229–1236. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bikson M, Inoue M, Akiyama H, Deans JK, Fox JE, Miyakawa H, Jefferys JGR. Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro. The Journal of Physiology. 2004;557:175–190. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bindman LJ, Lippold OCJ, Redfearn JWT. The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting after-effects. The Journal of Physiology. 1964;172:369–382. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyd S, Vandenberghe L. Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press; 2004.
-