Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes
- PMID: 24812040
- DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpu027
Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes
Abstract
The endophytic bacterial communities of six Prunus avium L. genotypes differing in their growth patterns during in vitro propagation were identified by culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. Five morphologically distinct isolates from tissue culture material were identified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. To detect and analyze the uncultivable fraction of endophytic bacteria, a clone library was established from the amplified 16S rDNA of total plant extract. Bacterial diversity within the clone libraries was analyzed by amplified ribosomal rDNA restriction analysis and by sequencing a clone for each identified operational taxonomic unit. The most abundant bacterial group was Mycobacterium sp., which was identified in the clone libraries of all analyzed Prunus genotypes. Other dominant bacterial genera identified in the easy-to-propagate genotypes were Rhodopseudomonas sp. and Microbacterium sp. Thus, the community structures in the easy- and difficult-to-propagate cherry genotypes differed significantly. The bacterial genera, which were previously reported to have plant growth-promoting effects, were detected only in genotypes with high propagation success, indicating a possible positive impact of these bacteria on in vitro propagation of P. avium, which was proven in an inoculation experiment.
Keywords: 16S rDNA sequencing; amplified ribosomal rDNA restriction analysis; bacterial endophytes; in vitro culture; plant growth-promoting bacteria.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Growth stage and tissue specific colonization of endophytic bacteria having plant growth promoting traits in hybrid and composite maize (Zea mays L.).Microbiol Res. 2018 Sep;214:101-113. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 May 26. Microbiol Res. 2018. PMID: 30031472
-
Impact of metagenomic DNA extraction procedures on the identifiable endophytic bacterial diversity in Sorghum bicolor (L. Moench).J Microbiol Methods. 2015 May;112:104-17. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Mar 14. J Microbiol Methods. 2015. PMID: 25775938
-
Characterization of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities from leaves, stems and roots of medicinal Stellera chamaejasme L.Syst Appl Microbiol. 2014 Jul;37(5):376-85. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 20. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2014. PMID: 24958606
-
Then and now: use of 16S rDNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and discovery of novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratories.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Oct;14(10):908-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02070.x. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008. PMID: 18828852 Review.
-
Endophytic bacterial diversity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots estimated by 16S rDNA sequence analysis.Microb Ecol. 2008 Apr;55(3):415-24. doi: 10.1007/s00248-007-9287-1. Epub 2007 Aug 10. Microb Ecol. 2008. PMID: 17690836
Cited by
-
Impact of conservation tillage on wheat performance and its microbiome.Front Plant Sci. 2023 Aug 21;14:1211758. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1211758. eCollection 2023. Front Plant Sci. 2023. PMID: 37670872 Free PMC article.
-
Low-cost and automated phenotyping system "Phenomenon" for multi-sensor in situ monitoring in plant in vitro culture.Plant Methods. 2023 May 2;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13007-023-01018-w. Plant Methods. 2023. PMID: 37131210 Free PMC article.
-
Presence and activity of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in Scots pine needles in a boreal forest: a nitrogen-addition experiment.Tree Physiol. 2023 Aug 11;43(8):1354-1364. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpad048. Tree Physiol. 2023. PMID: 37073466 Free PMC article.
-
Using plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) to improve plant development under in vitro culture conditions.Planta. 2022 May 5;255(6):117. doi: 10.1007/s00425-022-03897-0. Planta. 2022. PMID: 35513731 Review.
-
Dynamics of Bacterial Root Endophytes of Malus domestica Plants Grown in Field Soils Affected by Apple Replant Disease.Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 25;13:841558. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.841558. eCollection 2022. Front Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35401446 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources