Novice surgeons: do they benefit from 3D laparoscopy?
- PMID: 25772250
- DOI: 10.1007/s10103-015-1739-0
Novice surgeons: do they benefit from 3D laparoscopy?
Abstract
In this study, the impact of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) vision on laparoscopic performance of novice surgeons is examined. Twenty-five novice surgeons were directed to complete four basic tasks from European Training in Basic Laparoscopic Urological Skills (E-BLUS) with both 2D and 3D systems in a random order: task 1: needle guidance, task 2: cutting a circle, task 3: laparoscopic suturing, and task 4: pegs transfer. Quality and quantity scores for each task were measured. Participants completed all of the tasks in one modality of vision and than switched to the other. NASA Task Load Index was used for subjective workload assessment. Statistically significant differences in favor of 3D vision were detected in tasks 1 and 4 both in terms of quality and quantity. In task 2 and task 3, a significantly better performance was observed with the 3D vision only in quantity assessment. The participants who started the tasks in the 3D vision were better in performing the skills in 2D when compared to the participants who started with 2D vision. Overall, the participants reported a better perception of depth and spatial orientation with the 3D mode. Subjective work load was also lower for the tasks performed in 3D. Novice surgeons tended to perform better and felt much more comfortable with 3D in comparison to 2D laparoscopy. Even though previous task experience seemed to have an important impact on laparoscopic performance regardless of imaging modality, 3D laparoscopy seemed to facilitate the learning for novice surgeons.
Similar articles
-
Three-dimensional vision versus two-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance of trainee surgeons: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Updates Surg. 2023 Apr;75(3):455-470. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01465-z. Epub 2023 Feb 22. Updates Surg. 2023. PMID: 36811183 Review.
-
A Suggestion on How to Compare 2D and 3D Laparoscopy: A Qualitative Analysis of the Literature and Randomized Pilot Study.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jan;29(1):114-120. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0164. Epub 2018 Sep 25. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019. PMID: 30256710 Review.
-
Skills Comparison in Pediatric Residents Using a 2-Dimensional versus a 3-Dimensional High-Definition Camera in a Pediatric Laparoscopic Simulator.J Surg Educ. 2017 Jul-Aug;74(4):644-649. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 27. J Surg Educ. 2017. PMID: 28039097 Clinical Trial.
-
3D straight-stick laparoscopy versus 3D robotics for task performance in novice surgeons: a randomised crossover trial.Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5380-5387. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4893-y. Epub 2016 Apr 8. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 27059971 Clinical Trial.
-
Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1485-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4357-9. Epub 2015 Jul 3. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26139502
Cited by
-
The effects of 3D/Full HD and 2D/Ultra HD imaging systems on suturing skills during total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Mar;309(3):1027-1033. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07335-8. Epub 2024 Jan 7. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 38184803
-
3D versus 2D laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7914-7922. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10271-y. Epub 2023 Jul 10. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37430123
-
Three-dimensional vision versus two-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance of trainee surgeons: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Updates Surg. 2023 Apr;75(3):455-470. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01465-z. Epub 2023 Feb 22. Updates Surg. 2023. PMID: 36811183 Review.
-
A role for laparoscopy in the age of robotics: a retrospective cohort study of perioperative outcomes between 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs 3DHD laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.World J Urol. 2023 Feb;41(2):443-448. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04276-w. Epub 2023 Jan 23. World J Urol. 2023. PMID: 36688990
-
Clinical comparative study of glasses-free 3D and 2D thoracoscopic surgery in minimally invasive esophagectomy.Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 5;12:959484. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.959484. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35992851 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources