Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct 9:14:160.
doi: 10.1186/s12934-015-0345-y.

Molecular adaptation of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 to gallic acid revealed by genome-scale transcriptomic signature and physiological analysis

Affiliations

Molecular adaptation of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 to gallic acid revealed by genome-scale transcriptomic signature and physiological analysis

Inés Reverón et al. Microb Cell Fact. .

Abstract

Background: Gallic acid (GA) is a model hydroxybenzoic acid that occurs esterified in the lignocellulosic biomass of higher plants. GA displays relevant biological activities including anticancer properties. Owing to its antimicrobial and cellulase-inhibiting activities, GA also imposes constraints to the fermentability of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. In depth-knowledge of the mechanisms used by tolerant microorganisms to adapt to hydroxybenzoic acids would be a step forward to improve the bioavailability of GA or select/engineer production hosts with improved metabolic traits for the bioconversion of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass.

Results: Whole genome transcriptional profiling using DNA microarrays was used to characterize the molecular response of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 to GA. Expression levels of 14 and 40 genes were differentially regulated at 1.5 and 15 mM GA, respectively. The transcriptomic analysis identified a marked induction of genes with confirmed or related roles to gastrointestinal survival, the repression of genes coding for certain ABC-type transporters and modulation of genes involved in the control of intracellular ammonia levels, among other responses. Most notably, a core set of genes dedicated to produce GA from polyphenols (tanB Lp ), decarboxylate GA to pyrogallol (lpdB, lpdC and lpdD) and transport functions (lp_2943) was highly overexpressed at both GA concentrations. Correspondingly, resting cells of strain WCFS1 induced by GA, but not their non-induced controls, produced pyrogallol. Gene expression and organization of genes involved in GA metabolism suggested a chemiosmotic mechanism of energy generation. Resting cells of L. plantarum induced by GA generated a membrane potential and a pH gradient across the membrane immediately upon addition of GA. Altogether, transcriptome profiling correlated with physiological observations indicating that a proton motive force could be generated during GA metabolism as a result of electrogenic GA uptake coupled with proton consumption by the intracellular gallate decarboxylase.

Conclusions: The combination of transcriptome and physiological analyses revealed versatile molecular mechanisms involved in the adaptation of L. plantarum to GA. These data provide a platform to improve the survival of Lactobacillus in the gut. Our data may also guide the selection/engineering of microorganisms that better tolerate phenolic inhibitors present in pretreated lignocellulosic feedstocks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Gallic acid metabolism in resting cells of L. plantarum. A concentration of 1.5 mM gallic acid (GA) was added to washed cells of GA-induced L. plantarum WCFS1 (left panel) or non-induced L. plantarum WCFS1 (right panel). The GA and PG present in the supernatants after 15 (a), 30 (b) and 60 (c) min of incubation were detected by HPLC analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Energetics of gallic acid metabolism in L. plantarum WCFS1. The internal pH (a, c) and the membrane potential (b, d) of GA-induced cells (c, d) and non-induced cells (a, b) were continuously tracked in time. GA (1.5 mM) was added at the times indicated by the arrows. Cells were loaded with BCECF as described in “Methods”. Variations in membrane potential were quantitatively evaluated from the quenching of the potentiometric probe DisC3
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proposed mechanism of proton motive force generation by gallic acid metabolism in L. plantarum WCFS1. GA mono-anionic gallic acid, PG pyrogallol

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Serrano J, Puupponen-Pimia R, Dauer A, Aura AM, Saura-Calixto F. Tannins: current knowledge of food sources, intake, bioavailability and biological effects. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009;53:S310–S329. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200900039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim SH, Jun CD, Suk K, Choi BJ, Lim H, Park S, Lee SH, Shin HY, Kim DK, Shin TY. Gallic acid inhibits histamine release and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in mast cells. Toxicol Sci. 2006;91:123–131. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfj063. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kang MS, Oh JS, Kang IC, Hong SJ, Choi CH. Inhibitory effect of methyl gallate and gallic acid on oral bacteria. J Microbiol. 2008;46:744–750. doi: 10.1007/s12275-008-0235-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verma S, Singh A, Mishra A. Gallic acid: molecular rival of cancer. Environ Toxicol Phar. 2013;35:473–485. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2013.02.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bolca S, Van de Wiele T, Possemiers S. Gut metabotypes govern health effects of dietary polyphenols. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013;24:220–225. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.09.009. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

-