Ethical issues in neuroprosthetics
- PMID: 26859756
- DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/021002
Ethical issues in neuroprosthetics
Abstract
Objective: Neuroprosthetics are artificial devices or systems designed to generate, restore or modulate a range of neurally mediated functions. These include sensorimotor, visual, auditory, cognitive affective and volitional functions that have been impaired or lost from congenital anomalies, traumatic brain injury, infection, amputation or neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Cochlear implants, visual prosthetics, deep brain stimulation, brain-computer interfaces, brain-to-brain interfaces and hippocampal prosthetics can bypass, replace or compensate for dysfunctional neural circuits, brain injury and limb loss. They can enable people with these conditions to gain or regain varying degrees of control of thought and behavior. These direct and indirect interventions in the brain raise general ethical questions about weighing the potential benefit of altering neural circuits against the potential harm from neurophysiological and psychological sequelae. Other ethical questions are more specific to the therapeutic goals of particular neuroprosthetics and the conditions for which they are indicated. These include informed consent, agency, autonomy (free will) and identity.
Approach: This review is an analysis and discussion of these questions. It also includes consideration of social justice issues such as how to establish and implement fair selection criteria in providing access to neuroprosthetic research and balancing technological innovation with patients' best interests.
Main results: Neuroprosthetics can restore or improve motor and mental functions in bypassing areas of injury or modulating dysregulation in neural circuits. As enabling devices that integrate with these circuits, neuroprosthetics can restore varying degrees of autonomous agency for people affected by neurological and psychiatric disorders. They can also re-establish the connectedness and continuity of the psychological properties they had before injury or disease onset and thereby re-establish their identity. Neuroprosthetics can maximize benefit and minimize harm for people affected by damaged or dysfunctional brains and improve the quality of their lives.
Significance: Provided that adequate protections are in place for research subjects and patients, the probable benefit of research into and therapeutic applications of neuroprosthetics outweighs the risk and therefore can be ethically justified. Depending on their neurogenerative potential, there may be an ethical obligation to conduct this research. Advances in neuroscience will generate new ethical and philosophical questions about people and their brains. These questions should shape the evolution and application of novel techniques to better understand and treat brain disorders.
Similar articles
-
Neuroprosthetics in amputee and brain injury rehabilitation.Exp Neurol. 2017 Jan;287(Pt 4):479-485. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 9. Exp Neurol. 2017. PMID: 27519275 Review.
-
Brain-machine interfaces beyond neuroprosthetics.Neuron. 2015 Apr 8;86(1):55-67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.036. Neuron. 2015. PMID: 25856486 Review.
-
Conceptual and ethical issues with brain-hardware interfaces.Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;24(6):495-501. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32834bb8ca. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2011. PMID: 21934620 Review.
-
Consent to deep brain stimulation for neurological and psychiatric disorders.J Clin Ethics. 2010 Summer;21(2):104-11. J Clin Ethics. 2010. PMID: 20866016
-
The emerging world of motor neuroprosthetics: a neurosurgical perspective.Neurosurgery. 2006 Jul;59(1):1-14; discussion 1-14. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000221506.06947.AC. Neurosurgery. 2006. PMID: 16823294 Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding the Ethical Issues of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs): A Blessing or the Beginning of a Dystopian Future?Cureus. 2024 Apr 14;16(4):e58243. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58243. eCollection 2024 Apr. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38745805 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient-centered empirical research on ethically relevant psychosocial and cultural aspects of cochlear, glaucoma and cardiovascular implants - a scoping review.BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Aug 28;24(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00945-6. BMC Med Ethics. 2023. PMID: 37641094 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Merging Minds: The Conceptual and Ethical Impacts of Emerging Technologies for Collective Minds.Neuroethics. 2023;16(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s12152-023-09516-3. Epub 2023 Mar 28. Neuroethics. 2023. PMID: 37009261 Free PMC article.
-
Survey of Investigators About Sharing Human Research Data in the Neurosciences.Neurology. 2022 Sep 20;99(12):e1314-e1325. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200886. Epub 2022 Aug 18. Neurology. 2022. PMID: 35981894 Free PMC article.
-
Control and Ownership of Neuroprosthetic Speech.Philos Technol. 2021;34(3):425-445. doi: 10.1007/s13347-019-00389-0. Epub 2020 Jan 22. Philos Technol. 2021. PMID: 34722130 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials