Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar 10;3(3):CD007451.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007451.pub2.

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of beta-1 selective beta blockers for primary hypertension

Affiliations
Review

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of beta-1 selective beta blockers for primary hypertension

Gavin W K Wong et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Beta blockers are commonly used to treat hypertension. The blood pressure reading is the primary tool for physicians and patients to assess the efficacy of the treatment. The blood pressure lowering effect of beta-1 selective blockers is not known.

Objectives: To quantify the dose-related effects of various doses and types of beta-1 selective adrenergic receptor blockers on systolic and diastolic blood pressure versus placebo in people with primary hypertension.

Search methods: We searched the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) for related reviews.We searched the following databases for primary studies: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register (All years to 15 October 2015), CENTRAL via the Cochrane Register of Studies Online (2015, Issue 10), Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to 15 October 2015), Ovid EMBASE (1974 to 15 October 2015) and ClinicalTrials.gov (all years to 15 October 2015).The Hypertension Group Specialised Register includes controlled trials from searches of CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Food Science and Technology Abstracts (FSTA), Global Health, LILACS, MEDLINE, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, PsycINFO, Web of Science and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP).Electronic databases were searched using a strategy combining the Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy for identifying randomized trials in MEDLINE: sensitivity-maximizing version (2008 revision) with selected MeSH terms and free text terms. No language restrictions were used. The MEDLINE search strategy was translated into CENTRAL, EMBASE, the Hypertension Group Specialised Register and ClinicalTrials.gov using the appropriate controlled vocabulary as applicable. Full strategies are in Appendix 1.

Selection criteria: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel or cross-over trials. Studies had to contain a beta blocker monotherapy arm with fixed dose. People enrolled into the studies had to have primary hypertension at baseline. Duration of studies had to be between 3 weeks to 12 weeks. Drugs in this class of beta blockers are atenolol, betaxolol, bevantolol, bisoprolol, esmolol, metoprolol, nebivolol, pafenolol, practolol.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors confirmed the inclusion of studies and extracted the data independently. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3.5 was used to synthesise data.

Main results: We identified 56 RCTs (randomised controlled trials) that examined the blood pressure (BP) lowering efficacy of beta-1 selective blockers (beta-1 blocker) in 7812 primary hypertensive patients. Among the included trials, 26 RCTs were parallel studies and 30 RCTs were cross-over studies, examining eight beta-1 blockers. Overall, the majority of beta-1 blockers studied significantly lowered systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). In people with mild to moderate hypertension, beta-1 selective blockers lowered BP by an average of -10/-8 mmHg and reduced heart rate by 11 beats per minute. The maximum BP reduction of beta-1 blockers occurred at twice the starting dose. Individual beta-1 blockers did not exhibit a graded dose-response effect on SBP and DBP over the recommended dose range.Most beta-1 blockers tested significantly lowered heart rate. A graded dose-response of beta-1 blockers on heart rate was evident. Higher dose beta-1 blockers lowered heart rate more than lower doses. Individually and overall beta-1 blockers did not affect pulse pressure, which distinguishes them from other classes of drugs.

Authors' conclusions: This review provides low quality evidence that in people with mild to moderate hypertension, beta-1 selective blockers lowered BP by an average of -10/-8 mmHg and reduced heart rate by 11 beats per minute as compared to placebo. The effect of beta-1 blockers at peak hours, -12/-9 mmHg, was greater than the reduction at trough hours, -8/-7 mmHg. Beta-1 selective blockers lowered BP by a greater magnitude than dual receptor beta-blockers and partial agonist beta-blockers, lowered BP similarly to nonselective beta-blockers. Beta-1 selective blockers lowered SBP by a similar degree and lowered DBP by a greater degree than diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Because DBP is lowered by a similar extent to SBP, beta-1 selective blockers do not reduce pulse pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Gavin Wong: nothing to declare Heide Boyda: nothing to declare James Wright: nothing to declare.

Figures

1
1
PRISMA study flow diagram
2
2
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
Funnel plot of nebivolol 5 mg to 20 mg (SBP)
4
4
Funnel plot of nebivolol 5 mg to 20 mg (DBP)
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Nebivolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Nebivolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Nebivolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Nebivolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse Pressure.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Nebivolol vs Placebo, Outcome 5 Peak vs Trough SBP.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Nebivolol vs Placebo, Outcome 6 Peak vs Trough DBP.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Atenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Atenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Atenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 Atenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Metoprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
3.2
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3 Metoprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
3.3
3.3. Analysis
Comparison 3 Metoprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
3.4
3.4. Analysis
Comparison 3 Metoprolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
4.1
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4 Bisoprolol vs placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
4.2
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4 Bisoprolol vs placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
4.3
4.3. Analysis
Comparison 4 Bisoprolol vs placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
4.4
4.4. Analysis
Comparison 4 Bisoprolol vs placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
5.1
5.1. Analysis
Comparison 5 Betaxolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
5.2
5.2. Analysis
Comparison 5 Betaxolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
5.3
5.3. Analysis
Comparison 5 Betaxolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
5.4
5.4. Analysis
Comparison 5 Betaxolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
6.1
6.1. Analysis
Comparison 6 Bevantolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
6.2
6.2. Analysis
Comparison 6 Bevantolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
6.3
6.3. Analysis
Comparison 6 Bevantolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
6.4
6.4. Analysis
Comparison 6 Bevantolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
7.1
7.1. Analysis
Comparison 7 Pafenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
7.2
7.2. Analysis
Comparison 7 Pafenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
7.3
7.3. Analysis
Comparison 7 Pafenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
7.4
7.4. Analysis
Comparison 7 Pafenolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
8.1
8.1. Analysis
Comparison 8 Practolol vs Placebo, Outcome 1 SBP.
8.2
8.2. Analysis
Comparison 8 Practolol vs Placebo, Outcome 2 DBP.
8.3
8.3. Analysis
Comparison 8 Practolol vs Placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
8.4
8.4. Analysis
Comparison 8 Practolol vs Placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
9.1
9.1. Analysis
Comparison 9 Pooled overall effect, Outcome 1 SBP.
9.2
9.2. Analysis
Comparison 9 Pooled overall effect, Outcome 2 DBP.
9.3
9.3. Analysis
Comparison 9 Pooled overall effect, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
9.4
9.4. Analysis
Comparison 9 Pooled overall effect, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
9.5
9.5. Analysis
Comparison 9 Pooled overall effect, Outcome 5 WDAE.
9.6
9.6. Analysis
Comparison 9 Pooled overall effect, Outcome 6 SBP combined starting dose and 2 x starting dose.
9.7
9.7. Analysis
Comparison 9 Pooled overall effect, Outcome 7 DBP combined starting dose and 2 x starting dose.
9.8
9.8. Analysis
Comparison 9 Pooled overall effect, Outcome 8 Heart rate combined starting dose and 2 x starting dose.
9.9
9.9. Analysis
Comparison 9 Pooled overall effect, Outcome 9 Pulse pressure combined starting dose and 2 x starting dose.
9.10
9.10. Analysis
Comparison 9 Pooled overall effect, Outcome 10 SBP test for 2 x starting dose subgroup difference.
9.11
9.11. Analysis
Comparison 9 Pooled overall effect, Outcome 11 DBP test for 2 x starting dose subgroup difference.
9.12
9.12. Analysis
Comparison 9 Pooled overall effect, Outcome 12 Heart rate test for 2 x starting dose subgroup difference.

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007451

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Ades 1990 {published data only}
    1. Ades PA, Gunther PG, Meyer WL, Gibson TC, Maddalena J, Orfeo T, et al. Cardiac and skeletal muscle adaptations to training in systemic hypertension and effect of beta blockade (metoprolol or propranolol). American Journal of Cardiology 1990;66(5):591‐6. - PubMed
Ameling 1991 {published data only}
    1. Ameling EH, Korte DF, Man in 't Veld A. Impact of diagnosis and treatment of hypertension on quality of life: a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, cross‐over study of betaxolol. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 1991;18(5):752‐60. - PubMed
Asmar 1991 {published data only}
    1. Asmar RG, Kerihuel JC, Girerd XJ, Safar ME. Effect of bisoprolol on blood pressure and arterial hemodynamics in systemic hypertension. American Journal of Cardiology 1991;68(1):61‐4. - PubMed
Baez 1986 {published data only}
    1. Baez MA, Garg DC, Jallad NS, Weidler DJ. Antihypertensive effect of doxazosin in hypertensive patients: comparison with atenolol. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1986;21(Suppl 1):63s‐67s. [PUBMED: 2939869] - PMC - PubMed
Bateman 1979 {published data only}
    1. Bateman DN, Dean CR, Mucklow JC, Bulpitt CJ, Dollery CT. Atenolol and chlorthalidone in combination for hypertension. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1979;7(4):357‐63. - PMC - PubMed
Bengtsson 1976 {published data only}
    1. Bengtsson C. The effect of metoprolol ‐ a new selective adrenergic beta1‐receptor blocking agent‐‐ in mild hypertension. Acta Medica Scandinavica 1976;199(1‐2):65‐70. - PubMed
Berglund 1985 {published data only}
    1. Berglund G, Faire U, Castenfors J, Andersson G, Hartford M, Liedholm H, et al. Monitoring 24‐hour blood pressure in a drug trial. Evaluation of a noninvasive device. Hypertension 1985;7:688‐94. - PubMed
Broekman 1992 {published data only}
    1. Broekman CP, Haensel SM, Ven LLM, Slob AK. Bisoprolol and hypertension: effects on sexual functioning in men. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 1992;18(4):325‐31. - PubMed
Chan 1991 {published data only}
    1. Chan TYK, Woo KS, Critchley JAJH, Swaminathan R, Nicholls MG. Effects of nebivolol on blood pressure, hormones and cardiac function in Chinese subjects with essential hypertension. Drug investigations 1991;3:98‐104.
Chan 1992 {published data only}
    1. Chan TY, Woo KS, Nicholls MG. The application of nebivolol in essential hypertension: a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study. International Journal of Cardiology 1992;35(3):387‐95. - PubMed
Chrysant 1992 {published data only}
    1. Chrysant SG, Chappel C, Farnham DJ, Levin B, Lueg M, McCluskey D, et al. Antihypertensive and metabolic effects of single and combined atenolol regimens. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1992;32(1):61‐5. - PubMed
Cilliers 1979 {published data only}
    1. Cilliers AJ. Atenolol as primary therapy in previously untreated hypertensives and as an adjuvant to other therapy. A South African multicentre study. South African Medical Journal 1979;Suid‐Afrikaanse Tydskrif Vir Geneeskunde. 55(9):321‐4. - PubMed
Dahlof 1986 {published data only}
    1. Dahlof B, Sjoberg KH, Flygt C, Jern S, Hansen S, Hansson L, et al. Pafenolol in hypertension: a double‐blind randomized trial of a new beta 1‐selective adrenoceptor blocker. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 1986;8(1):55‐9. - PubMed
Davidov 1994 {published data only}
    1. Davidov ME, Singh SP, Vlachakis ND, Blumenthal JB, Simon JS, Bryzinski BS, et al. Bisoprolol, a once‐a‐day beta‐blocking agent for patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Clinical Cardiology 1994;17(5):263‐8. - PubMed
Deary 2001 {published data only}
    1. Deary AJ, Schumann AL, Murfet H, Haydock SF, Foo RSY, Brown MJ. Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled crossover comparison of five classes of antihypertensive drugs. Journal of Hypertension 2002;20:771‐7. - PubMed
Deary 2002 {published data only}
    1. Deary AJ, Schumann AL, Murfet H, Haydock S, Foo RS, Brown MJ. Influence of drugs and gender on the arterial pulse wave and natriuretic peptide secretion in untreated patients with essential hypertension.[see comment]. Clinical Science 2002;103(5):493‐9. - PubMed
Dhakam 2008 {published data only}
    1. Dhakam Z, Yasmin, McEniery CM, Burton T, Brown MJ, Wilkinson IB. A comparison of atenolol and nebivolol in isolated systolic hypertension. Journal of Hypertension 2008;26:351‐6. - PubMed
Frishman 1995 {published data only}
    1. Frishman WH, Burris JF, Mroczek WJ, Weir MR, Alemayehu D, Simon JS, et al. First‐line therapy option with low‐dose bisoprolol fumarate and low‐dose hydrochlorothiazide in patients with stage I and stage II systemic hypertension. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1995;35(2):182‐8. - PubMed
Frishman 2006 {published data only}
    1. Frishman WH, Hainer JW, Sugg J, M‐FACT Study Group. A factorial study of combination hypertension treatment with metoprolol succinate extended release and felodipine extended release results of the Metoprolol Succinate‐Felodipine Antihypertension Combination Trial (M‐FACT). American Journal of Hypertension 2006;19(4):388‐95. - PubMed
Frisk‐Holmberg 1985 {published data only}
    1. Frisk‐Holmberg M, Juhlin‐Dannfelt A, Astrom H. Haemodynamic and metabolic responses to prolonged exercise after chronic beta 1‐adrenoceptor blockade in hypertensive man. Clinical Physiology 1985;5(3):231‐42. - PubMed
Giles 2014 {published data only}
    1. Giles TD, Weber MA, Basile J, et al. Efficacy and safety of nebivolol and valsartan as fixed‐dose combination in hypertension: a randomised, multicentre study. Lancet 2014;383:1889‐98. - PubMed
Gostick 1977 {published data only}
    1. Gostick NK, Mayhew SR, Million R, Sagar D, Suxena SR, Ingram DF, et al. A dose‐response study of atenolol in mild to moderate hypertension in general practice. Current Medical Research & Opinion 1977;5(2):179‐84. - PubMed
Gudbjornsdottir 1997 {published data only}
    1. Gudbjornsdottir S, Fowelin J, Elam M, Attvall S, Bengtsson BA, Marin P, et al. The effect of metoprolol treatment on insulin sensitivity and diurnal plasma hormone levels in hypertensive subjects. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 1997;27(1):29‐35. - PubMed
Hansson 1975 {published data only}
    1. Hansson L, Aberg H, Karlberg BE, Westerlund A. Controlled study of atenolol in treatment of hypertension. British Medical Journal 1975;2(5967):367‐70. - PMC - PubMed
Himmelmann 1996 {published data only}
    1. Himmelmann A, Hedner T, Snoeck E, Lundgren B, Hedner J. Haemodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of oral d‐ and l‐nebivolol in hypertensive patients. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1996;51(3‐4):259‐64. - PubMed
Houston 1990 {published data only}
    1. Houston MC, Burger C, Hays JT, Nadeau J, Swift L, Bradley CA, et al. The effects of clonidine hydrochloride versus atenolol monotherapy on serum lipids, lipid subfractions, and apolipoproteins in mild hypertension. American Heart Journal 1990;120(1):172‐9. - PubMed
Jaattela 1990 {published data only}
    1. Jaattela A, Baandrup S, Houtzagers J, Westergren G. The efficacy of low dose metoprolol CR/ZOK in mild hypertension and in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1990;30(2 Suppl):S66‐71. - PubMed
Jeffers 1977 {published data only}
    1. Jeffers TA, Webster J, Petrie JC, Barker NP. Atenolol once‐daily in hypertension. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1977;4(5):523‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Lacourciere 1994 {published data only}
    1. Lacourciere Y, Arnott W. Placebo‐controlled comparison of the effects of nebivolol and low‐dose hydrochlorothiazide as monotherapies and in combination on blood pressure and lipid profile in hypertensive patients. Journal of Human Hypertension 1994;8(4):283‐8. - PubMed
Lepantalo 1983 {published data only}
    1. Lepantalo M, Totterman KJ. Effect of long‐term beta‐adrenergic‐blockade on calf blood flow in hypertensive patients. Clinical Physiology 1983;3(1):35‐42. - PubMed
    1. Lepantalo MJ, Totterman KJ. Lower limb haemodynamics during antihypertensive treatment with metoprolol and propranolol. International Angiology 1985;4(2):225‐8. - PubMed
Lischner 1987 {published data only}
    1. Lischner M, Lang R, Jutrin I, Ravid M. Atenolol vs. amiloride‐hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: a double‐blind, crossover, placebo‐controlled study. Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy 1987;21(1 Pt 1):43‐6. - PubMed
Maclean 1990 {published data only}
    1. Maclean D, Mitchell ET, Lewis R, Irvine N, McLay JS, McEwen J, et al. Comparison of once daily atenolol, nitrendipine and their combination in mild to moderate essential hypertension. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1990;29(4):455‐63. - PMC - PubMed
Myers 1983 {published data only}
    1. Myers MG, Champlain J. Effects of atenolol and hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure and plasma catecholamines in essential hypertension. Hypertension 1983;5(4):591‐6. - PubMed
NEB‐305 {unpublished data only}
    1. Mylan Bertek Pharmaceuticals. A study of the safety and efficacy of nebivolol in hypertensive patients. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2007/021742s000TOC.cfm (accessed Oct 2011).
Okawa 1986 {published data only}
    1. Okawa KK. Dose response studies of bevantolol in hypertensive patients. Angiology 1986;37:233‐8. - PubMed
Papademetriou 2006 {published data only}
    1. Papademetriou V, Hainer JW, Sugg J, Munzer D, ATTACH Study Group. Factorial antihypertensive study of an extended‐release metoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide combination. American Journal of Hypertension 2006;19(12):1217‐25. - PubMed
Petrie 1976 {published data only}
    1. Petrie JC, Galloway DB, Jeffers TA, Millar HR, Smith MC, Wood RA, et al. Methyldopa and propranolol or practolol in moderate hypertension. British Medical Journal 1976;2(6028):137‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Petrie 1980 {published data only}
    1. Petrie JC, Jeffers TA, Robb OJ, Scott AK, Webster J. Atenolol, sustained‐release oxprenolol, and long‐acting propranolol in hypertension. British Medical Journal 1980;280(6231):1573‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Rosen 1994 {published data only}
    1. Rosen RC, Kostis JB, Jekelis A, Taska LS. Sexual sequelae of antihypertensive drugs: treatment effects on self‐report and physiological measures in middle‐aged male hypertensives. Archives of Sexual Behavior 1994;23(2):135‐52. - PubMed
Saunders 2007 {published data only}
    1. Saunders E, Smith WB, DeSalvo KB, Sullivan WA. The efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol in hypertensive African American patients. Journal of Clinical Hypertension 2007;9(11):866‐75. - PMC - PubMed
Seedat 1980 {published data only}
    1. Seedat YK. Trial of atenolol and chlorthalidone for hypertension in black South Africans. British Medical Journal 1980;281(6250):1241‐3. - PMC - PubMed
Stornello 1991 {published data only}
    1. Stornello M, Valvo EV, Scapellato L. Comparative effects of enalapril, atenolol and chlorthalidone on blood pressure and kidney function of diabetic patients affected by arterial hypertension and persistent proteinuria. Nephron 1991;58(1):52‐7. - PubMed
Stumpe 1985 {published data only}
    1. Stumpe K, Kolloch R, Mathieu M, Capone P. A comparison of celiprolol and atenolol in the treatment of hypertension: a placebo controlled double blind study. British Journal of Clinical Practice 1985;Supplement. 40:73‐5. - PubMed
Tonkin 1990 {published data only}
    1. Tonkin AL, Wing LM, Russell AE, West MJ, Bune AJ, Morris MJ, et al. Diltiazem and atenolol in essential hypertension: additivity of effects on blood pressure and cardiac conduction with combination therapy. Journal of Hypertension 1990;8(11):1015‐9. - PubMed
Tseng 1993 {published data only}
    1. Tseng C‐D, Chiang F‐T, Hsu K‐L, Tseng Y‐Z, Hu W‐H, Chen J‐S, et al. Short‐term efficacy and safety of bisoprolol in treatment of patients with mild‐to‐moderate essential hypertension ‐ a two‐center, double‐blind study in Taiwan. Acta Cardiologica Sinica 1993;9(3):155‐60.
Van Bortel 1993 {published data only}
    1. Bortel LM, Breed JG, Joosten J, Kragten JA, Lustermans FA, Mooij JM, et al. Nebivolol in hypertension: a double‐blind placebo‐controlled multicenter study assessing its antihypertensive efficacy and impact on quality of life. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 1993;21(6):856‐62. - PubMed
Vanhees 1991 {published data only}
    1. Vanhees L, Fagard R, Lijnen P, Amery A. Effect of antihypertensive medication on endurance exercise capacity in hypertensive sportsmen. Journal of Hypertension 1991;9(11):1063‐8. - PubMed
Van Herwaarden 1977 {published data only}
    1. Herwaarden CL, Fennis JF, Binkhorst RA, Van't Laar A. Haemodynamic effects of adrenaline during treatment of hypertensive patients with propranolol and metoprolol. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1977;12(6):397‐402. - PubMed
Van Merode 1989 {published data only}
    1. Merode T, Bortel LM, Smeets FA, Mooij JM, Bohm RO, Rahn KH, et al. Verapamil and nebivolol improve carotid artery distensibility in hypertensive patients. Journal of Hypertension ‐ Supplement 1989;7(6):S262‐3. - PubMed
Van Nueten 1997 {published data only}
    1. Nueten L, Dupont AG, Vertommen C, Goyvaerts H, Robertson JI. A dose‐response trial of nebivolol in essential hypertension. Journal of Human Hypertension 1997;11(2):139‐44. - PubMed
Van Nueten 1998 {published data only}
    1. Nueten L, Taylor FR, Robertson JI. Nebivolol vs atenolol and placebo in essential hypertension: a double‐blind randomised trial. Journal of Human Hypertension 1998;12(2):135‐40. - PubMed
Verdecchia 1983 {published data only}
    1. Verdecchia P, Brignole M, Delfino G, Queirolo C, Marchi G, Bertulla A, et al. Systolic time intervals as possible predictors of pressure response to sustained beta‐adrenergic blockade in arterial hypertension. A within‐patient, placebo‐controlled study. Hypertension 1983;5(1):140‐6. - PubMed
Verdecchia 1988 {published data only}
    1. Verdecchia P, Gatteschi C, Benemio G, Boldrini F, Guerrieri M, Porcellati C, et al. Duration of the antihypertensive action of atenolol, enalapril and placebo: a randomized within‐patient study using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Therapy, & Toxicology 1988;26(11):570‐4. - PubMed
Weiss 2007 {published data only}
    1. (2007). Erratum. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension 2007;9:806. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2007.tb00010.x] - DOI
    1. Weiss RJ, Weber MA, Carr AA, Sullivan WA. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled parallel‐group study to assess the efficacy and safety of nebivolol, a novel beta‐blocker, in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Journal of Clinical Hypertension 2007;9(9):667‐76. - PMC - PubMed
Williams 1992 {published data only}
    1. William RL, Goyle KK, Herman TS, Rofman BA, Ruoff GE, Hogan LB. Dose‐dependent effect of betaxolol in hypertension: A double‐blind, multicenter study. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1992;32:360‐7. - PubMed
Wing 1988 {published data only}
    1. Wing LM, Chalmers JP, West MJ, Russell AE, Morris MJ, Cain MD, et al. Enalapril and atenolol in essential hypertension: attenuation of hypotensive effects in combination. Clinical & Experimental Hypertension ‐ Part A, Theory & Practice 1988;10(1):119‐33. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Wald 2008 {published data only}
    1. Wald DS, Law M, Mills S, Bestwick JP, Morris JK, Wald NJ. A 16‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, crossover trial to quantify the combined effect of an angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor and a beta‐blocker on blood pressure reduction. Clinical Therapeutics 2008;30:2030‐9. - PubMed

Additional references

Chen 2010
    1. Chen JMH, Heran BS, Perez MI, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of beta‐blockers as second‐line therapy for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007185.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Chen 2010b
    1. Chen N, Zhou M, Yang M, Guo J, Zhu C, Yang J, et al. Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003654.pub4] - DOI - PubMed
Deeks 2011
    1. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
eCPS
    1. Canadian Pharmacist Association. https://www.e‐therapeutics.ca/cps.showMonograph.action Accessed October 2012.
FDA
    1. FDA Online Label Repository. http://labels.fda.gov/ Accessed May 2013.
Fitzgerald 1991
    1. Fitzgerald JD. The applied pharmacology of beta‐adrenoceptor antagonists (beta blockers) in relation to clinical outcomes. Cardiovascular drugs and therapy 1991;5:561‐576. - PubMed
Heran 2008a
    1. Heran BS, Wong MMY, Heran IK, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003823.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Heran 2008b
    1. Heran BS, Wong MMY, Heran IK, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003822.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011a
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Higgins 2011b
    1. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Kamp 2000
    1. Kamp TJ, Hell JW. Regulation of Cardiac L‐Type Calcium Channels by Protein Kinase A and Protein Kinase C. Circulation Research. 2000;87:1095‐102. - PubMed
Lancaster 1988
    1. Lancaster SG, Sorkin EM. Bisoprolol: a preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetics properties and therapeutics efficacy in hypertension and angina pectoris. Drugs 1988;36:256‐85. - PubMed
Law 2005
    1. Law M, Morris JK, Jordan R, Wald N. Headaches and the treatment of blood pressure results from a meta‐analysis of 94 randomized placebo‐controlled trials with 24 000 participants. Circulation 2005;112:2301‐2306. - PubMed
Magee 2003
    1. Magee LA, Duley L. Oral beta‐blockers for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002863] - DOI - PubMed
Musini 2008
    1. Musini VM, Fortin PM, Bassett K, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of renin inhibitors for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007066.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Musini 2014
    1. Musini VM, Nazer M, Bassett K, Wright JM. Blood pressure‐lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 5. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003824.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Ravid 1985
    1. Ravid M, Lang R, Jutrin I. The relative antihypertensive potency of propranolol, oxpranolol, atenolol and metoprolol given once daily. Archive Internal Medicine 1985;145:1321‐3. - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Sterne 2011
    1. Sterne JAC, Egger M, Moher D (editors). Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Veverka 2006
    1. Veverka A, Nuzum DS, Jolly JL. Nebivolol: A third generation beta adrenergic blocker. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2006 Jul‐Aug;40(7‐8):1353‐60. [PUBMED: 16822893] - PubMed
Westfall 2011
    1. Westfall TC, Westfall DP. Ch. 8 Neurotransmission: The autonomic and somatic motor nervous systems. Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 12. The McGraw‐Hill Companies, Inc , 2011.
Wiysonge 2012
    1. Wiysonge CS, Bradley HA, Volmink J, Mayosi BM, Mbewu A, Opie LH. Beta‐blockers for hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub4] - DOI - PubMed
Wong 2014a
    1. Wong GWK, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of nonselective beta‐blockers for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007452.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Wong 2014b
    1. Wong GWK, Boyda HN, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of partial agonist beta blocker monotherapy for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007450.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Wong 2015
    1. Wong GWK, Laugerotte A, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of dual alpha and beta blockers for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007449.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Wright 2000
    1. Wright JM. Choosing a first‐line drug in the management of elevated blood pressure: What is the evidence? 2: β‐Blockers. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2000;163(2):188‐192. - PMC - PubMed
Wright 2009
    1. Wright JM, Musini VM. First‐line drugs for hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001841.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Xue 2015
    1. Xue H, Lu Z, Tang WL, Pang LW, Wang GM, Wong GWK, Wright JM. First‐line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first‐line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub2] - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

-