Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar 31:7:461.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00461. eCollection 2016.

Effects of Acute Laboratory Stress on Executive Functions

Katrin Starcke  1 , Carina Wiesen  1 , Patrick Trotzke  1 , Matthias Brand  2
Affiliations

Effects of Acute Laboratory Stress on Executive Functions

Katrin Starcke et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Recent research indicates that stress can affect executive functioning. However, previous results are mixed with respect to the direction and size of effects, especially when considering different subcomponents of executive functions. The current study systematically investigates the effects of stress on the five components of executive functions proposed by Smith and Jonides (1999): attention and inhibition; task management; planning; monitoring; and coding. Healthy participants (N = 40) were either exposed to the computerized version of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test as a stressor (N = 20), or to a rest condition (N = 20). Stress reactions were assessed with heart rate and subjective measures. After the experimental manipulation, all participants performed tasks that measure the different executive functions. The manipulation check indicates that stress induction was successful (i.e., the stress group showed a higher heart rate and higher subjective responses than the control group). The main results demonstrate that stressed participants show a poorer performance compared with unstressed participants in all executive subcomponents, with the exception of monitoring. Effect sizes for the tasks that reveal differences between stressed and unstressed participants are high. We conclude that the laboratory stressor used here overall reduced executive functioning.

Keywords: attention and inhibition; coding; executive functions; monitoring; planning; stress; task management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Trail Making Test (TMT).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Color Word Interference Test (CWIT).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Tower of Hanoi (ToH).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Balance Switch Task (BST).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Arnsten A. F. T. (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10 410–422. 10.1038/nrn2648 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baddeley A. D., Hitch G. (1974). “Working memory,” in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 8 ed. Bower G. A. (New York, NY: Academic Press; ), 47–89.
    1. Baumeister R. F., Bratslavsky E., Muraven M., Tice D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74 1252–1265. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bäumler G. (1985). Farbe-Wort-Interferenztest Nach Stroop (FWIT) [Color-Word-Interference-Test After Stroop]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
    1. Beste C., Yildiz A., Meissner T. W., Wolf O. T. (2013). Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks. Behav. Brain Res. 252 260–265. 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.013 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

-