Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan;49(1):36-45.
doi: 10.1038/ng.3720. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

The genomic landscape of balanced cytogenetic abnormalities associated with human congenital anomalies

Claire Redin  1   2   3 Harrison Brand  1   2   3 Ryan L Collins  1   2   3   4 Tammy Kammin  5 Elyse Mitchell  6 Jennelle C Hodge  6   7   8 Carrie Hanscom  1   2   3 Vamsee Pillalamarri  1   2   3 Catarina M Seabra  1   2   3   9 Mary-Alice Abbott  10 Omar A Abdul-Rahman  11 Erika Aberg  12 Rhett Adley  1 Sofia L Alcaraz-Estrada  13 Fowzan S Alkuraya  14 Yu An  1   15 Mary-Anne Anderson  16 Caroline Antolik  1   2   3 Kwame Anyane-Yeboa  17 Joan F Atkin  18   19 Tina Bartell  20 Jonathan A Bernstein  21 Elizabeth Beyer  22   23 Ian Blumenthal  1 Ernie M H F Bongers  24 Eva H Brilstra  25 Chester W Brown  26   27 Hennie T Brüggenwirth  28 Bert Callewaert  29 Colby Chiang  1 Ken Corning  30 Helen Cox  31 Edwin Cuppen  25 Benjamin B Currall  1   5   32 Tom Cushing  33 Dezso David  34 Matthew A Deardorff  35   36 Annelies Dheedene  29 Marc D'Hooghe  37 Bert B A de Vries  24 Dawn L Earl  38 Heather L Ferguson  5 Heather Fisher  39 David R FitzPatrick  40 Pamela Gerrol  5 Daniela Giachino  41 Joseph T Glessner  1   2   3 Troy Gliem  6 Margo Grady  42 Brett H Graham  26   27 Cristin Griffis  22   23 Karen W Gripp  43 Andrea L Gropman  44 Andrea Hanson-Kahn  21   45 David J Harris  46   47 Mark A Hayden  5 Rosamund Hill  48 Ron Hochstenbach  25 Jodi D Hoffman  49 Robert J Hopkin  50   51 Monika W Hubshman  52   53   54 A Micheil Innes  55 Mira Irons  56 Melita Irving  57   58 Jessie C Jacobsen  59 Sandra Janssens  29 Tamison Jewett  60 John P Johnson  61 Marjolijn C Jongmans  24 Stephen G Kahler  62 David A Koolen  24 Jerome Korzelius  25 Peter M Kroisel  63 Yves Lacassie  64 William Lawless  1 Emmanuelle Lemyre  65 Kathleen Leppig  66   67 Alex V Levin  68 Haibo Li  69 Hong Li  69 Eric C Liao  70   71   72 Cynthia Lim  62   73 Edward J Lose  74 Diane Lucente  1 Michael J Macera  75 Poornima Manavalan  1 Giorgia Mandrile  41 Carlo L Marcelis  24 Lauren Margolin  76 Tamara Mason  76 Diane Masser-Frye  77 Michael W McClellan  78 Cinthya J Zepeda Mendoza  5   79 Björn Menten  29 Sjors Middelkamp  25 Liya R Mikami  80   81 Emily Moe  22   23 Shehla Mohammed  57 Tarja Mononen  82 Megan E Mortenson  60   83 Graciela Moya  84 Aggie W Nieuwint  85 Zehra Ordulu  5   79 Sandhya Parkash  12   86 Susan P Pauker  79   87 Shahrin Pereira  5 Danielle Perrin  76 Katy Phelan  88 Raul E Piña Aguilar  13   89 Pino J Poddighe  85 Giulia Pregno  41 Salmo Raskin  80 Linda Reis  22   90 William Rhead  22   23   91 Debra Rita  92 Ivo Renkens  25 Filip Roelens  93 Jayla Ruliera  16 Patrick Rump  94 Samantha L P Schilit  32   79 Ranad Shaheen  14 Rebecca Sparkes  55 Erica Spiegel  95 Blair Stevens  96 Matthew R Stone  1   2   3 Julia Tagoe  97 Joseph V Thakuria  79   98 Bregje W van Bon  24 Jiddeke van de Kamp  85 Ineke van Der Burgt  24 Ton van Essen  94 Conny M van Ravenswaaij-Arts  94 Markus J van Roosmalen  25 Sarah Vergult  29 Catharina M L Volker-Touw  25 Dorothy P Warburton  17 Matthew J Waterman  1   99 Susan Wiley  100 Anna Wilson  1 Maria de la Concepcion A Yerena-de Vega  101 Roberto T Zori  102 Brynn Levy  103 Han G Brunner  24   104 Nicole de Leeuw  24 Wigard P Kloosterman  25 Erik C Thorland  6 Cynthia C Morton  3   5   79   105   106 James F Gusella  1   3   32 Michael E Talkowski  1   2   3
Affiliations

The genomic landscape of balanced cytogenetic abnormalities associated with human congenital anomalies

Claire Redin et al. Nat Genet. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Despite the clinical significance of balanced chromosomal abnormalities (BCAs), their characterization has largely been restricted to cytogenetic resolution. We explored the landscape of BCAs at nucleotide resolution in 273 subjects with a spectrum of congenital anomalies. Whole-genome sequencing revised 93% of karyotypes and demonstrated complexity that was cryptic to karyotyping in 21% of BCAs, highlighting the limitations of conventional cytogenetic approaches. At least 33.9% of BCAs resulted in gene disruption that likely contributed to the developmental phenotype, 5.2% were associated with pathogenic genomic imbalances, and 7.3% disrupted topologically associated domains (TADs) encompassing known syndromic loci. Remarkably, BCA breakpoints in eight subjects altered a single TAD encompassing MEF2C, a known driver of 5q14.3 microdeletion syndrome, resulting in decreased MEF2C expression. We propose that sequence-level resolution dramatically improves prediction of clinical outcomes for balanced rearrangements and provides insight into new pathogenic mechanisms, such as altered regulation due to changes in chromosome topology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have none to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characterization of BCAs detected by karyotyping at nucleotide resolution a. Genome-wide map of all BCA breakpoints identified in the cohort by whole-genome sequencing. One color is used per BCA to represent all rearrangement breakpoints in each subject. The scatter plot on the outside ring denotes breakpoint density per 1-Mb bin across the genome, with a blue arrow displaying the largest clustering of breakpoints at 5q14.3; b. Scatter plot summarizing the overall genomic imbalance associated with fully reconstructed BCAs at varying size thresholds. Curves represent the fraction of cases with final genomic imbalances greater than the corresponding size provided. Solid lines denote the final genomic imbalances for all BCAs, and are further delineated by deletions (red) or duplications (blue). The final genomic imbalances among fully mapped BCAs is also split between cases that have been pre-screened by CMA (dashed line) versus cases without CMA data (dotted line); c. Sequence signatures of BCA breakpoints. Histogram representing nucleotide signatures at the junction of 662 Sanger-validated breakpoints: inserted nucleotides, blunt ends, microhomology, or longer stretches of homology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
De novo BCAs associated with congenital anomalies disrupt functionally relevant loci. a. Boxplots illustrate specific gene-set enrichments at BCA breakpoints in subjects with congenital anomalies. Each boxplot represents the expected distribution (median, first and third quartiles) based on total intersections between 100,000 sets of simulated breakpoints and a particular gene-set. Red diamonds indicate the observed intersection values. Empirical Monte-Carlo P-values are indicated; b. Venn diagram showing the detailed overlap of disrupted genes previously associated with three neurodevelopmental phenotypes in amalgamated exome and CNV studies. In black: high-confidence genes (3 or more de novo LoF mutations reported), in grey: low-confidence genes (two de novo LoF mutations). c–e) Diagnostic yields associated with the overall cohort and multiple subgroups of BCAs. c. Diagnostic yield associated with all 248 mapped BCAs from subjects with congenital or developmental anomalies; d. Diagnostic yields partitioned by inheritance status; e. Diagnostic yields associated with BCAs depleted for large pathogenic CNVs thanks to CMA pre-screen compared to BCAs that had not been pre-screened by CMA.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Recurrent disruption of long-range regulatory interactions at the 5q14.3 locus. a. Genome-wide distribution of BCA breakpoints in the cohort across each 1-Mb bin. P-values correspond to observed vs. expected cluster sizes after 100,000 Monte Carlo randomizations. Corrected P-values are reported. One cluster, localized to 5q14.3, achieved genome-wide significance (threshold demarcated by red line); b. Hi-C profile and contact domains at the 5q14.3 locus derived from human LCLs. Overlapping Hi-C data suggests that the topology of the MEF2C-contact domain is altered in subjects carrying BCAs. Brain-expressed enhancers located in the region, loops involving MEF2C (yellow circles) and CTCF binding sites (green: forward, red: reverse) are indicated. Multiple pathogenic mechanisms converge on a similar syndrome: multi-genic deletions that encompass MEF2C along with one or both TAD boundaries (n=68), MEF2C-intragenic deletions (n=12) or LoF mutations, deletions that do not encompass MEF2C but overlap one TAD boundary (n=13), and BCA breakpoints distal to MEF2C (breakpoints from seven subjects reported in this study and three previously reported subjects),,.; c. Proposed model of the chromatin folding in the region defining a regulatory unit for MEF2C; d. Significantly decreased expression of MEF2C was observed in subjects harboring BCAs distal to MEF2C compared to controls. MEF2C-expression was measured by qRT-PCR, normalized against three endogenous genes and compared to the average MEF2C-expression from 16 age-matched controls (two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test: DGAP131, DGAP191, DGAP222: P=0.0085, DGAP218: P=0.0160). Individual expression values, median, first and third quartiles are indicated.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correlations between phenotypes and genes disrupted in subjects harboring pathogenic BCAs. For each gene, the phenotypes reported in the corresponding subject were digitalized using HPO. One tile represents the normalized count of HPO terms belonging to each organ category reported in the subject(s). Genes clustered together when sharing similarly affected organs, from which five groups can be delineated: 1- genes associated with multiple nervous system and craniofacial abnormalities (dark blue); 2- genes connected to multiple neurological phenotypes (pink); 3- genes associated with craniofacial abnormalities and a few neurological symptoms (black); 4- genes associated with skeletal and limb abnormalities, and with limited neurological involvement (green); 5- genes without neurological involvement (light blue).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jacobs PA, Melville M, Ratcliffe S, Keay AJ, Syme J. A cytogenetic survey of 11,680 newborn infants. Ann Hum Genet. 1974;37:359–376. - PubMed
    1. Nielsen J, Wohlert M. Chromosome abnormalities found among 34,910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus, Denmark. Hum Genet. 1991;87:81–83. - PubMed
    1. Ravel C, Berthaut I, Bresson JL, Siffroi JP Genetics Commission of the French Federation of C. Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in phenotypically normal and fertile adult males: large-scale survey of over 10,000 sperm donor karyotypes. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1484–1489. - PubMed
    1. Funderburk SJ, Spence MA, Sparkes RS. Mental retardation associated with “balanced” chromosome rearrangements. Am J Hum Genet. 1977;29:136–141. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marshall CR, et al. Structural variation of chromosomes in autism spectrum disorder. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82:477–488. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

-