Core outcome set for studies investigating management of selective fetal growth restriction in twins
- PMID: 31273879
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.20388
Core outcome set for studies investigating management of selective fetal growth restriction in twins
Abstract
Objective: Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) occurs in monochorionic twin pregnancies when unequal placental sharing leads to restriction in the growth of just one twin. Management options include laser separation of the fetal circulations, selective reduction or expectant management, but what constitutes the best treatment is not yet known. New trials in this area are urgently needed but, in this rare and complex group, maximizing the relevance and utility of clinical research design and outputs is paramount. A core outcome set ensures standardized outcome collection and reporting in future research. The objective of this study was to develop a core outcome set for studies evaluating treatments for sFGR in monochorionic twins.
Methods: An international steering group of clinicians, researchers and patients with experience of sFGR was established to oversee the process of development of a core outcome set for studies investigating the management of sFGR. Outcomes reported in the literature were identified through a systematic review and informed the design of a three-round Delphi survey. Clinicians, researchers, and patients and family representatives participated in the survey. Outcomes were scored on a Likert scale from 1 (limited importance for making a decision) to 9 (critical for making a decision). Consensus was defined a priori as a Likert score of ≥ 8 in the third round of the Delphi survey. Participants were then invited to take part in an international meeting of stakeholders in which the modified nominal group technique was used to consider the consensus outcomes and agree on a final core outcome set.
Results: Ninety-six outcomes were identified from 39 studies in the systematic review. One hundred and three participants from 23 countries completed the first round of the Delphi survey, of whom 88 completed all three rounds. Twenty-nine outcomes met the a priori criteria for consensus and, along with six additional outcomes, were prioritized in a consensus development meeting, using the modified nominal group technique. Twenty-five stakeholders participated in this meeting, including researchers (n = 3), fetal medicine specialists (n = 3), obstetricians (n = 2), neonatologists (n = 3), midwives (n = 4), parents and family members (n = 6), patient group representatives (n = 3), and a sonographer. Eleven core outcomes were agreed upon. These were live birth, gestational age at birth, birth weight, intertwin birth-weight discordance, death of surviving twin after death of cotwin, loss during pregnancy or before final hospital discharge, parental stress, procedure-related adverse maternal outcome, length of neonatal stay in hospital, neurological abnormality on postnatal imaging and childhood disability.
Conclusions: This core outcome set for studies investigating the management of sFGR represents the consensus of a large and diverse group of international collaborators. Use of these outcomes in future trials should help to increase the clinical relevance of research on this condition. Consensus agreement on core outcome definitions and measures is now required. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords: Delphi consensus; consensus; core outcome set; fetal growth restriction; multiple pregnancy.
Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Study protocol: developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies.Trials. 2019 Jan 9;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3153-y. Trials. 2019. PMID: 30626413 Free PMC article.
-
Core outcome set for research studies evaluating treatments for twin-twin transfusion syndrome.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;54(2):255-261. doi: 10.1002/uog.20183. Epub 2019 Jul 11. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30520170
-
Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a Delphi procedure.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;53(1):47-54. doi: 10.1002/uog.19013. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 29363848
-
Outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy with selective intrauterine growth restriction according to umbilical artery Doppler flow pattern of smaller twin: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):559-568. doi: 10.1002/uog.17362. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27859836 Review.
-
Core outcome set for perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep;62(3):374-382. doi: 10.1002/uog.26235. Epub 2023 Aug 7. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37099763 Review.
Cited by
-
Balancing key stakeholder priorities and ethical principles to design a trial comparing intervention or expectant management for early-onset selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancy: FERN qualitative study.BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 9;14(8):e080488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080488. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39122401 Free PMC article.
-
Gestational age at birth and outcome in monochorionic twins with different types of selective fetal growth restriction: A systematic literature review.Prenat Diagn. 2022 Aug;42(9):1094-1110. doi: 10.1002/pd.6206. Epub 2022 Jul 17. Prenat Diagn. 2022. PMID: 35808908 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Synthesizing Core Outcome Sets for outcomes research in cohort studies: a systematic review.Pediatr Res. 2022 Oct;92(4):936-945. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01801-2. Epub 2021 Dec 17. Pediatr Res. 2022. PMID: 34921214 Free PMC article.
-
Core Outcome Sets (COS) related to pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04164-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. PMID: 34627170 Free PMC article.
-
Study protocol: a core outcome set for perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Trials. 2021 Feb 23;22(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05120-z. Trials. 2021. PMID: 33622390 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Buca D, Pagani G, Rizzo G, Familiari A, Flacco ME, Manzoli L, Liberati M, Fanfani F, Scambia G, D'Antonio F. Outcome in monochorionic twin pregnancies with selective intrauterine growth restriction according to the umbilical artery Doppler pattern of the smaller twin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 50: 559-568.
-
- Khalil A, Beune I, Hecher K, Wynia K, Ganzevoort W, Reed K, Lewi L, Oepkes D, Gratacos E, Thilaganathan B, Gordijn SJ. Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 47-54.
-
- Townsend R, D'Antonio F, Sileo FG, Kumbay H, Thilaganathan B, Khalil A. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction according to management: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 36-46.
-
- Sileo FG, Duffy JMN, Townsend R, Khalil A. Variation in outcome reporting across studies evaluating interventions for selective fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54: 10-15.
-
- Duffy JMN, Ziebland S, von Dadelszen P, McManus RJ. Tackling poorly selected, collected, and reported outcomes in obstetrics and gynecology research. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220: 71.e1-4.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous