Google Versus PubMed: Comparison of Google and PubMed's Search Tools for Answering Clinical Questions in the Emergency Department
- PMID: 31623934
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.003
Google Versus PubMed: Comparison of Google and PubMed's Search Tools for Answering Clinical Questions in the Emergency Department
Abstract
Study objective: We assess which search tool returns the highest-quality, most relevant citations for standardized clinical questions arising at the point of care in the emergency department (ED).
Methods: Search terms related to 3 clinical questions commonly encountered in the ED were entered into 5 search tools. The following search engines and tools were assessed: Google Web, Google Scholar, PubMed, PubMed Clinical Queries set to narrow search, and PubMed Clinical Queries set to broad search. The first 60 hits, in the order of most recent first, were reviewed and assessed for quality of evidence, relevance versus irrelevance, and number of high-quality hits, and each search instrument was graded for overall readability with a visual analog scale. Quality relevance ratio, defined as the ratio of high-quality relevant hits to low-quality irrelevant hits, was calculated for each tool according to these searches.
Results: Overall, PubMed Clinical Queries narrow search had the highest quality relevance ratio, averaging 0.85. PubMed Clinical Queries narrow search also returned high-quality relevant hits without the need to filter out as many low-quality irrelevant hits. Google Scholar retrieved the highest number of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials, and returned the most complete search results, finding relevant citations other search engines did not. Google Web consistently had the lowest quality relevance ratio and contained many duplicate hits.
Conclusion: For the common clinical questions assessed in this study, PubMed Clinical Queries narrow search had the highest-quality, most relevant, and most readable hits. Google Scholar performed well, in some cases retrieving citations that other search engines did not. PubMed and Google Web were not as efficient.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Finding Needles in Stacks of Needles.Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;75(3):416-417. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Dec 23. Ann Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 31874769 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.Lupus. 2018 Oct;27(12):1911-1917. doi: 10.1177/0961203318793213. Epub 2018 Aug 16. Lupus. 2018. PMID: 30114969
-
An Improved Forensic Science Information Search.Forensic Sci Rev. 2015 Jan;27(1):41-52. Forensic Sci Rev. 2015. PMID: 26227137 Review.
-
Sensitivity and predictive value of 15 PubMed search strategies to answer clinical questions rated against full systematic reviews.J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 12;14(3):e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2021. J Med Internet Res. 2012. PMID: 22693047 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Retrieval of diagnostic and treatment studies for clinical use through PubMed and PubMed's Clinical Queries filters.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):652-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000233. Epub 2011 Jun 15. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011. PMID: 21680559 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar literature searches.Respir Care. 2010 May;55(5):578-83. Respir Care. 2010. PMID: 20420728
Cited by
-
Postpartum Psychosis: A Preventable Psychiatric Emergency.Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2024 Jan;22(1):44-52. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20230025. Epub 2024 Jan 12. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2024. PMID: 38694156 Review.
-
Health Literacy Analytics of Accessible Patient Resources in Cardiovascular Medicine: What are Patients Wanting to Know?Kans J Med. 2023 Dec 31;16:309-315. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol16.20554. eCollection 2023. Kans J Med. 2023. PMID: 38298385 Free PMC article.
-
Retraction of Clinical Trials about the SARS-CoV-2 Infection: An Unaddressed Problem and Its Possible Impact on Coronavirus Disease (COVID)-19 Treatment.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 19;20(3):1835. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031835. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36767202 Free PMC article.
-
PET/CT Evaluation of the Effect of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of T-Cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma.Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug 16;2022:6057017. doi: 10.1155/2022/6057017. eCollection 2022. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022. PMID: 36072622 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources