SVT discrimination algorithms significantly reduce the rate of inappropriate therapy in the setting of modern-day delayed high-rate detection programming
- PMID: 31646695
- DOI: 10.1111/jce.14250
SVT discrimination algorithms significantly reduce the rate of inappropriate therapy in the setting of modern-day delayed high-rate detection programming
Abstract
Background: Contemporary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) programming involving delayed high-rate detection and use of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) discriminators has significantly reduced the rate of inappropriate shocks. The extent to which SVT algorithms alone reduce inappropriate therapies is poorly understood.
Methods and results: PainFree SST enrolled 2770 patients with a single- or dual-chamber ICD or cardiac resynchronization defibrillator. Patients were followed for 22 ± 9 months with SVT discriminators on in 96% of patients. Sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and SVT episodes were adjudicated by an independent physician committee. For this analysis, all episodes were subjected to postprocessing computer simulation with SVT discriminators off with and without delayed high-rate detection criteria (ventricular fibrillation zone only, 30/40 at 320 ms). There were 3282 adjudicated SVT episodes of which 115 resulted in an ICD shock and 113 received only ATP (2-year inappropriate shock and therapy rates of 3.1% and 4.1%). Therapy was appropriately withheld for the remaining 3054 SVT episodes. With both SVT discriminators and delayed high-rate detection simulated off, the 2-year inappropriate therapy rate would have been 22.9% (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.20-7.49). With SVT discriminators simulated off and delayed high-rate detection simulated on in all patients, the 2-year rate would have been 6.4% (HR = 1.63; CI: 1.44-1.85).
Conclusions: The use of SVT discriminators has a significant role in reducing the rate of inappropriate ICD therapy even in the setting of delayed high-rate detection settings. Deactivating SVT discriminators would have resulted in an overall increase in the inappropriate ICD therapy rate by 63% and 524% with and without delayed high-rate detection programming, respectively.
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; inappropriate shock.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator in 2019 and beyond.Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Aug;30(6):378-384. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Oct 1. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020. PMID: 31610949 Review.
-
Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Programming in Patients With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 23;7(5):e007748. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007748. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29475875 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Sex Differences in Inappropriate ICD Device Therapies: MADIT-II and MADIT-CRT.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;28(1):94-102. doi: 10.1111/jce.13102. Epub 2016 Oct 27. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017. PMID: 27696593 Clinical Trial.
-
Reduction of inappropriate anti-tachycardia pacing therapies and shocks by a novel suite of detection algorithms in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: a historical comparison of a prospective database.Europace. 2016 Sep;18(9):1391-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv420. Epub 2016 Jan 29. Europace. 2016. PMID: 26826135
-
Supraventricular tachycardia-ventricular tachycardia discrimination algorithms in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: state-of-the-art review.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 May;12(5):606-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00606.x. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001. PMID: 11386525 Review.
Cited by
-
Multidisciplinary Critical Care Management of Electrical Storm: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Jun 6;81(22):2189-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.424. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37257955 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Successful Identification of and Discrimination Between Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmia with the Aid of Pacing and Defibrillator Devices.Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2021 Dec;10(4):235-240. doi: 10.15420/aer.2021.54. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2021. PMID: 35106174 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Wilkoff BL, Fauchier L, Stiles MK, et al. HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing. Heart Rhythm. 2015;13:e50-e86.
-
- Wilkoff BL, Williamson BD, Stern RS, et al. PREPARE Study Investigators: strategic programming of detection and therapy parameters in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators reduces shocks in primary prevention patients: results from the PREPARE (Primary Prevention Parameters Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:541-550.
-
- Gasparini M, Proclemer A, Klersy C, et al. Effect of long-detection interval vs standard-detection interval for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on antitachycardia pacing and shock delivery: the ADVANCE III randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;309:1903-1911.
-
- Moss AJ, Schuger C, Beck CA, et al. MADIT-RIT Investigators: Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2275-2283.
-
- Wathen MS, DeGroot PJ, Sweeney MO, et al. PainFREE Rx II Investigators: Prospective randomized multicenter trial of empirical antitachycardia pacing versus shocks for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Pacing Fast Ventricular Tachycardia Reduces Shock Therapies (PainFREE Rx II) trial results. Circulation. 2004;110:2591-2596.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical