Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov-Dec;23(6):517-524.
doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_716_18.

An oral cavity profile in illicit- Drug abusers?

Affiliations

An oral cavity profile in illicit- Drug abusers?

Muhammad Mahmoud Al Bush. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2019 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to shed the light on the oral cavity profile assessing teeth and periodontal tissues in previously illicit drug abusers of cannabis and heroin with different drug addiction circumstances.

Materials and methods: Study population included 100 inmates, aged 21-64 years, incarcerated for previous addiction to cannabis or heroin. Personal information and drug circumstances of addiction were registered with dental and periodontal parameters including daily teeth brushing frequency, decayed missed filled teeth (DMFT), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), recession, and clinical attachment loss (CAL).

Results: Half of the population were illiterate, and 70% were married. Heroin was the most previously abused drug and more than 70% of the participants had been addicted for more than 12 months. Low teeth brushing activity profile dominated with higher values for DMFT and BOP in the heroin group compared with the cannabis (after age adjustment) (DMFT = 22.6 ± 7.9, 18.5 ± 9.8, respectively, P = 0.03) (BOP = 60% ± 30%, 66.6% ± 32%, respectively). In addition, higher values of BOP were recorded in the heroin injecting group compared with both of heroin fumes inhalation and cannabis smoking (BOP = 76.41% ± 27.7%, 59.12% ± 33.6%, 60.05% ± 31.8% P = 0.04, respectively), whereas PI, GI, Reces, and CAL means were comparable among groups regardless of other addiction circumstances.

Conclusion: Abused drug type and the way its chemical form being administered would negatively affect, directly or indirectly, the oral cavity concomitantly with the sustained state of self-negligence and less interest in implementing the oral hygiene measurements. Altogether, addiction circumstances synergize leading to a distinctive dental and oral profile which would impose a burden to adapt a more customized treatment approach.

Keywords: Dental profile; oral cavity; periodontal indices; prison inmates; substance abuse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample distribution according to the educational status
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sample distribution according to the marital status
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sample distribution according to the way of drug administration of cannabis and heroin
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sample distribution according to addiction circumstances of heroin (from above to bottom); abuse duration (month), daily quantity (g/day), daily frequency
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cause of cessation failure and self-opinion for prevention (%)
Figure 6
Figure 6
Generalized cervical caries in a 33-year-old patient inhaled burnt heroin fumes for 9 years
Figure 7
Figure 7
Generalized cervical caries with recessions in a 40-year-old patient inhaled burnt heroin fumes for 10 years
Figure 8
Figure 8
Generalized cervical caries with generalized periodontitis in a 48-year-old patient smoked cannabis for 17 years
Figure 9
Figure 9
Generalized cervical caries with a very poor oral condition in a 36-year-old patient injected heroin for 8 years
Figure 10
Figure 10
Sample distribution according to the current dental complaint
Figure 11
Figure 11
Means of decayed missed filled teeth score and bleeding on probing (%) in the two addicted groups
Figure 12
Figure 12
Means of plaque index, gingival index, recession (mm), and clinical attachment loss (mm) in the two addicted groups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. United Nations Publications. World Drug Report 2017. [Last accessed on 2018 Aug 12]. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/wdr2017/field/Booklet_1_EXSUM.pdf .
    1. Greydanus DE, Hawver EK, Greydanus MM, Merrick J. Marijuana: Current concepts. Front Public Health. 2013;1:42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Novak SP, Kral AH. Comparing injection and non-injection routes of administration for heroin, methamphetamine, and cocaine users in the United States. J Addict Dis. 2011;30:248–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ritter JM, Lewis LD, Mant TG, Ferro A. Drugs and alcohol abuse. In: Purdy S, editor. A Text Book of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 5th ed. London: Hachette Livre; 2008. pp. 437–8.
    1. Benowitz N. Section II. Specific poisons and drugs: Diagnosis and treatment. In: Kent O, editor. Poisoning and Drug Overdose. 6th ed. New York, USA: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2012. pp. 269–71.
-