Challenges and opportunities of automated protein-protein docking: HDOCK server vs human predictions in CAPRI Rounds 38-46
- PMID: 31994779
- DOI: 10.1002/prot.25874
Challenges and opportunities of automated protein-protein docking: HDOCK server vs human predictions in CAPRI Rounds 38-46
Abstract
Protein-protein docking plays an important role in the computational prediction of the complex structure between two proteins. For years, a variety of docking algorithms have been developed, as witnessed by the critical assessment of prediction interactions (CAPRI) experiments. However, despite their successes, many docking algorithms often require a series of manual operations like modeling structures from sequences, incorporating biological information, and selecting final models. The difficulties in these manual steps have significantly limited the applications of protein-protein docking, as most of the users in the community are nonexperts in docking. Therefore, automated docking like a web server, which can give a comparable performance to human docking protocol, is pressingly needed. As such, we have participated in the blind CAPRI experiments for Rounds 38-45 and CASP13-CAPRI challenge for Round 46 with both our HDOCK automated docking web server and human docking protocol. It was shown that our HDOCK server achieved an "acceptable" or higher CAPRI-rated model in the top 10 submitted predictions for 65.5% and 59.1% of the targets in the docking experiments of CAPRI and CASP13-CAPRI, respectively, which are comparable to 66.7% and 54.5% for human docking protocol. Similar trends can also be observed in the scoring experiments. These results validated our HDOCK server as an efficient automated docking protocol for nonexpert users. Challenges and opportunities of automated docking are also discussed.
Keywords: CAPRI; HDOCK; automated docking; protein-protein docking; scoring function; template-based docking.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
The trRosetta server for fast and accurate protein structure prediction.Nat Protoc. 2021 Dec;16(12):5634-5651. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00628-9. Epub 2021 Nov 10. Nat Protoc. 2021. PMID: 34759384 Review.
-
Performance of human and server prediction in CAPRI rounds 38-45.Proteins. 2020 Aug;88(8):1110-1120. doi: 10.1002/prot.25956. Epub 2020 Jul 1. Proteins. 2020. PMID: 32483825 Free PMC article.
-
Template-based modeling and ab-initio docking using CoDock in CAPRI.Proteins. 2020 Aug;88(8):1100-1109. doi: 10.1002/prot.25892. Epub 2020 Mar 25. Proteins. 2020. PMID: 32181952
-
Docking proteins and peptides under evolutionary constraints in Critical Assessment of PRediction of Interactions rounds 38 to 45.Proteins. 2020 Aug;88(8):986-998. doi: 10.1002/prot.25857. Epub 2019 Dec 3. Proteins. 2020. PMID: 31746034
-
What method to use for protein-protein docking?Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2019 Apr;55:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.12.010. Epub 2019 Feb 1. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2019. PMID: 30711743 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Protein-Protein Docking with Large-Scale Backbone Flexibility Using Coarse-Grained Monte-Carlo Simulations.Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 8;22(14):7341. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147341. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34298961 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Wodak SJ, Janin J. Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol. 1978;124:323-342.
-
- Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:235-242.
-
- Huang S-Y. Search strategies and evaluation in protein-protein docking: principles, advances and challenges. Drug Discov Today. 2014;19:1081-1096.
-
- Vajda S, Hall DR, Kozakov D. Sampling and scoring: a marriage made in heaven. Proteins. 2013;81:1874-1884.
-
- Vakser IA. Protein-protein docking: from interaction to interactome. Biophys J. 2014;107:1785-1793.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials