Clinical information seeking behavior of physicians: A systematic review
- PMID: 32334400
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104144
Clinical information seeking behavior of physicians: A systematic review
Abstract
Introduction: Physicians encounter a large number of questions during patient care. Therefore, finding high-quality evidence provides a good opportunity to improve patient care and continue learning.
Objectives: The present study aims to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the physicians' clinical information-seeking behavior.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, Emerald, Wiley Online Library, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were systematically searched based on the defined criteria. The inclusion criteria were the original articles in the context of patient care and full-text articles published in English from 2002 to 2017. The articles were reviewed, selected, and analyzed in group discussions.
Results: Seventy-three articles met the study criteria. Therapy, diagnosis, and epidemiology ranked the highest ones among physicians' information needs. The mean frequency of questions raised during patient care was varied from 0.18 to 1.5 per patient, and the percentage of questions answered ranged between 22.8 and 93 %. The time taken to find the answers to the questions was between 2 to 32 min. Consultation with colleagues, alongside reviewing journal articles, Internet websites, textbooks, and MEDLINE/PubMed were the most frequently used sources reported in the retrieved articles. Further, common search strategies used by physicians included keywords, Boolean operators, similar medical terms, and advanced search. In addition, lack of time, and information searching skills and the unawareness of accessible sources were the most frequent barriers while easily searching and finding information and summaries and synthesized evidence-based materials mainly facilitated information seeking.
Conclusions: Physicians increasingly encounter clinical point-of-care questions. However, the facilitation of accessing online information sources has not enabled the physicians to find answers to many of their questions. Considering the fact that they often refer to colleagues, Internet websites, and databases to find answers, the quality of information should be improved by evaluating the physicians' information-seeking behavior in the first stage, and developing information technology in a point-of-care environment, integrating EHR systems to communicate with colleagues, and accessing databases in the second stage.
Keywords: Barriers; Clinical information-seeking behavior; Facilitators; Information need; Patient care; Point-of-care.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Personal, technical and organisational factors affect whether physicians seek answers to clinical questions during patient care: a literature review.Health Info Libr J. 2021 Jun;38(2):81-96. doi: 10.1111/hir.12323. Epub 2020 Jul 20. Health Info Libr J. 2021. PMID: 32686897 Review.
-
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447007
-
Clinical questions raised by clinicians at the point of care: a systematic review.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 May;174(5):710-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.368. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24663331 Review.
-
Information-seeking behaviors of podiatric physicians.J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2012 Nov-Dec;102(6):451-62. doi: 10.7547/1020451. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2012. PMID: 23204196
-
Information-seeking behaviors and reflective practice.J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Spring;26(2):120-7. doi: 10.1002/chp.60. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006. PMID: 16802313
Cited by
-
Identifying primary care clinicians' preferences for, barriers to, and facilitators of information-seeking in clinical practice in Singapore: a qualitative study.BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 18;25(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02429-x. BMC Prim Care. 2024. PMID: 38762445 Free PMC article.
-
Modelling of physicians' clinical information-seeking behaviour in Iran: a grounded theory study.BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 16;14(4):e080602. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080602. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38626973 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Priorities in a Statewide Cardiovascular and Diabetes Health Collaborative Based on the Results of a Needs Assessment: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Apr 12;8:e55285. doi: 10.2196/55285. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 38607661 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the influence of big data resources on medical knowledge recall for staff with and without medical collaboration platform.BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 13;23(1):956. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04926-6. BMC Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 38093304 Free PMC article.
-
Classifying the Factors Affecting Information Therapy to Support Clinical Decisions on Addiction.Addict Health. 2023 Jul;15(3):156-162. doi: 10.34172/ahj.2023.1325. Epub 2023 Jul 29. Addict Health. 2023. PMID: 38026721 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous