Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon

EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) provided a scientific opinion on the assessment of a decontamination process consisting in the adsorption with activated carbon and physical filtration of fish oil in order to reduce the amount of dioxins (polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs)) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (DL-PCBs). All feed decontamination processes must comply with the acceptability criteria specified in the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786. The data provided by the feed business operator were assessed with respect to the efficacy of the process and on information demonstrating that the process does not adversely affect the characteristics and the nature of the product. As described in scientific literature, the process was effective in removing PCDD/Fs (84%) and DL-PCBs (55%), and therefore, it is possible to meet the current EU requirements with respect to these contaminants, assuming that the level of contamination of untreated fish oil was within the range of the tested batches. The Panel considered that the reference to information available in published literature was a pragmatic approach to demonstrate that the use of activated carbon adsorption does not lead to any detrimental changes in the nature of the fish oil; however, it was noted that the process could deplete some beneficial constituents (e.g. vitamins). Information was provided to demonstrate the safe disposal of the waste material. The CONTAM Panel concluded that on the basis of the information submitted by the feed business operator the proposed decontamination process to remove dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and DL-PCBs from the fish oil by means of physical filtration with activated carbon, was compliant with the acceptability criteria provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786 of 19 May 2015.

Keywords: PCDD/Fs; decontamination process; dioxins; dioxin‐like PCBs; feed; fish oil; physical filtration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the process used by the feed business operator
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graph representing analytical data from the tested fish oil batches

  1. Black lines in box plots show the median and blue lines the arithmetic mean. Whiskers show 10th and 90th percentiles and the dots outliers. Red dashed lines indicate maximum limits in fish oil according to Directive 2002/32/EC and its amendments

See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Guidance for the assessment of detoxification processes in feed.
    EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM); Schrenk D, Bignami M, Bodin L, Chipman JK, Del Mazo J, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hoogenboom LR, Leblanc JC, Nebbia CS, Nielsen E, Ntzani E, Petersen A, Sand S, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Wallace H, Rose M, Cottrill B, Lundebye AK, Metzler M, Whitty B, Navarro-Villa A, Anguita M, Christodoulidou A, Hogstrand C. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), et al. EFSA J. 2024 Jan 10;22(1):e8528. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8528. eCollection 2024 Jan. EFSA J. 2024. PMID: 38205503 Free PMC article.
  • Risk for animal and human health related to the presence of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in feed and food.
    EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM); Knutsen HK, Alexander J, Barregård L, Bignami M, Brüschweiler B, Ceccatelli S, Cottrill B, Dinovi M, Edler L, Grasl-Kraupp B, Hogstrand C, Nebbia CS, Oswald IP, Petersen A, Rose M, Roudot AC, Schwerdtle T, Vleminckx C, Vollmer G, Wallace H, Fürst P, Håkansson H, Halldorsson T, Lundebye AK, Pohjanvirta R, Rylander L, Smith A, van Loveren H, Waalkens-Berendsen I, Zeilmaker M, Binaglia M, Gómez Ruiz JÁ, Horváth Z, Christoph E, Ciccolallo L, Ramos Bordajandi L, Steinkellner H, Hoogenboom LR. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), et al. EFSA J. 2018 Nov 20;16(11):e05333. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5333. eCollection 2018 Nov. EFSA J. 2018. PMID: 32625737 Free PMC article.

References

    1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2009. Guidance of the Scientific Committee on transparency in the scientific aspects of risk assessment carried out by EFSA. Part 2: general principles. EFSA Journal 2009;7(5):1051, 22 pp. 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1051 - DOI
    1. Eppe G, Carbonnelle S, Hellebosch L, De Meulenaer B, Vila Ayala J, De Greyt W, Verhé R, Goeyens L, Focant J and De Pauw E, 2005. Removal of PCDD/Fs and DL‐PCBs from fish oil by activated carbon: compliance with European Legislation. Organohalogen Compounds, 67, 1412–1416.
    1. Maes J, De Meulenaer B, Van Heerswynghelsa P, De Greyta W, Eppec G, De Pauwc E and Huyghebaertb A, 2005. Removal of Dioxins and PCB from Fish Oil by Activated Carbon and Its Influence on the Nutritional Quality of the Oil. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 82, 593–597.
    1. Oterhals Å, Solvang M, Nortvedt R and Berntssen MHG, 2007. Optimization of activated carbon‐based decontamination of fish oil by response surface methodology. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 109, 691–705.

LinkOut - more resources

-