Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 1;180(9):1225-1231.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2975.

Incidence of Hip Fracture Over 4 Decades in the Framingham Heart Study

Affiliations

Incidence of Hip Fracture Over 4 Decades in the Framingham Heart Study

Jay Swayambunathan et al. JAMA Intern Med. .

Erratum in

  • Error in Funding/Support Section of End Matter.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1717. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6386. JAMA Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 33074311 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Age-adjusted hip fracture incidence is decreasing in the US. The decrease has been attributed to osteoporosis treatment, but the cause is unknown.

Objective: To examine the decrease in hip fracture incidence over the past 40 years in the US.

Design, setting, and participants: A population-based cohort study using participants in the Framingham Heart Study was conducted. A total of 4918 men and 5634 women were followed up prospectively for the first hip fracture between January 1, 1970, and December 31, 2010. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2019, to May 30, 2020.

Main outcomes and measures: Incidence of hip fracture and contemporaneous prevalence of risk factors for hip fractures analyzed with age-period-cohort models.

Results: The study contained more than 105 000 person-years in 10 552 individuals with a gradual shift toward the offspring participants in the 1980s and 1990s. Women represented more than 55% of the study sample over the years. Adjusted for age, the incidence of hip fracture decreased by 4.4% (95% CI, 6.8%-1.9%) per year from 1970 to 2010. Both period associations (P < .001) and birth cohort associations (P < .001) were statistically significant. For example, in persons aged 85 to 89 years, the incidence of hip fracture was 759 per 100 000 person-years in the offspring group compared with 2018 per 100 000 person-years in the original cohort. The decrease in hip fracture incidence was coincident with a decrease in smoking and heavy drinking. Smoking decreased from 38% in the 1970s to 15% in the late 2000s, while heavy drinking decreased from 7.0% to 4.5%. The prevalence of other risk factors for hip fracture, such as underweight (body mass index <18.5), obesity (body mass index >30), and early menopause (age <45 years) were stable over the study period. When persons who never smoked were evaluated, a change in the incidence of -3.2% (95% CI, -6.0% to -0.4%) per year was observed. The difference between the decrease of the entire population and nonsmokers of 1.5% per year was similar to the hazard ratio conferred by smoking (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.14-1.96).

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, individuals born more recently appeared to have a low risk for hip fracture. Reductions in smoking and heavy drinking were the risk factor changes coincident with the observed decrease in hip fracture. Attributing the decrease in hip fracture incidence up to 2010 solely to better treatment is not supported by these data, emphasizing the need to treat patients with osteoporosis while continuing to encourage public health interventions for smoking cessation and heavy drinking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Kiel reported receiving grants from Radius Health, grants from Amgen, personal fees from Wolters Kluwer, and personal fees from Solarea Bio during the conduct of the study; and grants from National Dairy Council and personal fees from Springer outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Makeup of Study Cohort Over Time
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Hip Fracture Incidence Decrease Over the Study Period
The dots represent the incidence (events per 100 000 person-years). The error bars are the 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Relative Risk of Hip Fracture by Time Period and Prevalence of Risk Factors for Hip Fracture
The relative risk of hip fracture (A) and prevalence of risk factors (B) in a given period compared with the reference period of 1986-1990 are shown. Risk factors included smoking (yes/no), heavy drinking (≥3 drinks per day), low body mass index (<18 [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]), early-onset menopause (menopause age <45 years), glucocorticoid use, rheumatoid arthritis, and diabetes (defined as fasting glucose level >126 mg/dL [to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0555] or use of medication for diabetes).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1573-1579. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1462 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lewiecki EM, Wright NC, Curtis JR, et al. . Hip fracture trends in the United States, 2002 to 2015. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(3):717-722. doi:10.1007/s00198-017-4345-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leslie WD, O’Donnell S, Jean S, et al. ; Osteoporosis Surveillance Expert Working Group . Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. JAMA. 2009;302(8):883-889. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1231 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abrahamsen B, Skjødt MK, Vestergaard P. Hip fracture rates and time trends in use of anti-osteoporosis medications in Denmark for the period 2005 to 2015: missed opportunities in fracture prevention. Bone. 2019;120:476-481. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2018.12.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jean S, O’Donnell S, Lagacé C, et al. ; Osteoporosis Surveillance Expert Working Group . Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada: an age-period-cohort analysis. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(6):1283-1289. doi:10.1002/jbmr.1863 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

-