Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;18(1):63-75.
doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12666. Epub 2022 Jun 20.

Acute oral toxicity of zinc phosphide: an assessment for wild house mice (Mus musculus)

Affiliations

Acute oral toxicity of zinc phosphide: an assessment for wild house mice (Mus musculus)

Lyn A Hinds et al. Integr Zool. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Irregular plagues of house mice, Mus musculus, incur major economic impacts on agricultural production in Australia. The efficacy of zinc phosphide (ZnP), the only registered broadacre control agent for mice, is reported as increasingly variable. Have mice become less sensitive over time or are they taking a sub-lethal dose and developing aversion? In this laboratory study, the sensitivity of mice (wild caught; outbred laboratory strain) was assessed using oral gavage of a range of ZnP concentrations. The estimated LD50 values (72-79 mg ZnP/kg body weight) were similar for each mouse group but are significantly higher than previously reported. The willingness of mice to consume ZnP-coated grains was determined. ZnP-coated grains (50 g ZnP/kg grain) presented in the absence of alternative food were consumed and 94% of wild mice died. Mice provided with alternative food and ZnP-coated wheat grains (either 25 or 50 g ZnP/kg grain) consumed toxic and non-toxic grains, and mortality was lower (33-55%). If a sublethal amount of ZnP-coated grain was consumed, aversion occurred, mostly when alternative food was present. The sensitivity of wild house mice to ZnP in Australia is significantly lower than previously assumed. Under laboratory conditions, ZnP-coated grains coated with a new higher dose (50 g ZnP/kg grain) were readily consumed. Consumption of toxic grain occurred when alternative food was available but was decreased. Our unambiguous findings for house mice indicate a re-assessment of the ZnP loading for baits used for control of many rodents around the world may be warranted.

Keywords: LD50; acute rodenticide; aversion; efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of mice dying after oral gavage with different ZnP concentrations (mg ZnP/kg body weight). Calculated dose response curves for (a) outbred laboratory mice, (b) naïve wild house mice, and (c) exposed wild house mice. Horizontal red dashed line represents 50% mortality; vertical solid line equates to LD50 value; vertical dashed lines represent standard error for the LD50 estimate. n > 4 animals per test dose, with a mix of males and females.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. APVMA (2000). Evaluation of the new active zinc phosphide in the product MouseOff zinc phosphide bait. Public Release Summary. National Registration Authority for Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals, Canberra, Australia. Available from URL: https://apvma.gov.au/node/14101
    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015). Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.
    1. Bell HB (1972). The hazards of secondary poisoning from zinc phosphide to selected vertebrate species (Master's thesis). University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
    1. Brown PR, Arthur AD, Jones DA, Davies MJ, Grice D, Pech RP (2020). Multiple ecological processes underpin the eruptive dynamics of small mammals: House mice in a semi‐arid agricultural environment. Ecology and Evolution 10, 3477–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown PR, Chambers LK, Singleton GR (2002). Pre‐sowing control of house mice (Mus domesticus) using zinc phosphide: Efficacy and potential non‐target effects. Wildlife Research 29, 27–37.
-