Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 1;33(4):237-256.
doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000833.

How should low-density lipoprotein cholesterol be calculated in 2022?

Janine Martins  1   2 , H Muller Rossouw  1 , Tahir S Pillay  1
Affiliations
Review

How should low-density lipoprotein cholesterol be calculated in 2022?

Janine Martins et al. Curr Opin Lipidol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The reference method for low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) quantitation is β-quantification, a technically demanding method that is not convenient for routine use. Indirect calculation methods to estimate LDL-C, including the Friedewald equation, have been used since 1972. This calculation has several recognized limitations, especially inaccurate results for triglycerides (TG) >4.5 mmol/l (>400 mg/dl). In view of this, several other equations were developed across the world in different datasets.The purpose of this review was to analyze the best method to calculate LDL-C in clinical practice by reviewing studies that compared equations with measured LDL-C.

Recent findings: We identified 45 studies that compared these formulae. The Martin/Hopkins equation uses an adjustable factor for TG:very low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratios, validated in a large dataset and demonstrated to provide more accurate LDL-C calculation, especially when LDL <1.81 mmol/l (<70 mg/dl) and with elevated TG. However, it is not in widespread international use because of the need for further validation and the use of the adjustable factor. The Sampson equation was developed for patients with TG up to 9 mmol/l (800 mg/dl) and was based on β-quantification and performs well on high TG, postprandial and low LDL-C samples similar to direct LDL-C.

Summary: The choice of equation should take into the level of triglycerides. Further validation of different equations is required in different populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organisation. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). 2021.
    1. Ginsberg HN, Rosenson RS, Hovingh GK, et al. LDL-C calculated by Friedewald, Martin–Hopkins, or NIH Eq. (2) versus beta-quantification: pooled alirocumab trials. J Lipid Res 2022; 63:100148.
    1. Wolska A, Remaley AT. Measuring LDL-cholesterol: what is the best way to do it? Curr Opin Cardiol 2020; 35:405–411.
    1. Farukhi Z, Mora S. Nonfasting lipids for all patients? Clin Chem 2021; 67:41–45.
    1. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972; 18:499–502.

Publication types

-