Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 15;14(7):4515-4531.
eCollection 2022.

Constructing a novel prognostic signature of tumor driver genes for breast cancer

Affiliations

Constructing a novel prognostic signature of tumor driver genes for breast cancer

Liqiang Zhou et al. Am J Transl Res. .

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically explore the function and prognostic ability of tumor-driver genes (TDGs) in breast carcinoma (BRCA).

Methods: Functional enrichment analysis of BRCA differentially expressed TDGs was assesed. We used univariate Cox, lasso, and multivariate Cox regression to identify the independent prognostic TDGs of BRCA. Then we constructed a prognostic signature and verified its predictive performance. Gene set enrichment analysis of the signal pathway revealed the differences between the prognostic signature high- and low-risk groups. Finally, a nomogram related to the prognostic model was established and verified.

Results: A total of 595 differentially expressed TDGs were identified, which are related to various molecular mechanisms of BRCA progression. We identified 8 independent prognostic TDGs for BRCA and validated their expression and prognosis with public data and clinical samples. The BRCA cohort was divided into training and validation cohorts, and prognostic signatures were constructed separately. The log-rank test showed that the survival rate of the high-risk group was significantly lower than that of the low-risk group in the prognostic signature (P<0.001); the AUC in the three cohorts were 0.805, 0.712, and 0.760, respectively; the nomogram also showed better predictive performance. Analyzing the difference between the two risk subtypes, the high-risk group is mainly enriched in angiogenesis, MTORC1, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and glycolysis, which means it is highly malignant.

Conclusions: The prognostic signature and nomogram was confirmed to accurately predict the prognosis of patients with BRCA and we validated the hub genes, suggesting their potential as future therapeutic targets.

Keywords: Breast cancer; nomogram; prognostic signature; tumor drive gene.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Identification of 595 differentially expressed drive genes in breast cancer. A. Volcano plots show differentially expressed driver genes, with green dots representing 327 down-regulated genes and red dots representing 268 up-regulated genes. B. Volcano plot showing the 535 differentially expressed tumor driver gene expression.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Functional enrichment analysis of the 535 differentially expressed driver genes, Top 10 results for each section. A. Cellular components of gene ontology. B. Molecular function of gene ontology. C. Biological process of gene ontology. D. Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes function enrichment analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Identification of the 8 breast cancer hub independent prognostic drive genes. A. Univariate Cox regression analysis screened 28 prognostic related tumor driver genes. B. Lasso regression analysis identified 21 candidate genes from 28 prognostic related genes. C. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified 8 hub-independent prognostic breast cancer driver genes from candidate genes.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Identification and construction of tumor driver gene-related prognostic signatures. A, E, I. Kaplan-Meier curve showed that the survival rate of the high-risk group was significantly lower than that of the low-risk group. B, F, J. The area under the 5-year subject-operable curve was calculated to assess the predictive performance of the prognostic signature. C, G, L. Univariate Cox regression analysis identifies clinicopathological characteristics, risk scores and the prognosis of breast cancer patients. D, H, M. Univariate Cox regression analysis identified clinicopathological characteristics with risk score independent prognostic performance. K. Distribution map of survival status in the complete cohort.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Analysis of the difference between the high and low risk groups. A. Principal component analysis showed significant differences between the two risk groups. B. Risk grouping is related to Nstage, T stage, pathological analysis, and age. C. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis showed that the high-risk group was enriched in angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, glycolysis, MTORC1 signaling, and PI3K/Akt/MTOR signaling.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Nomogram construction and verification. A. A nomogram based on the prognostic signature of the driver gene and clinicopathological characteristics. B. 5-year calibration curve validated nomogram. C. 10-year calibration curve validated nomogram.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Verification of the expression and prognosis of the 8 hub tumor driven genes. A. HPA database verifies MERTK, ABCC9, EZR, SAV1 protein expression. B. Oncomine verifies the 8 hub tumor driver gene mRNA expression. C. The expression of eight hub tumor driver genes in MCF10A and MCF 7 was verified by rt-PCR. D. Kaplan-Meier plotter verifies the prognosis of the 8 hub genes.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. - PubMed
    1. Pernas S, Barroso-Sousa R, Tolaney SM. Optimal treatment of early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancer. 2018;124:4455–4466. - PubMed
    1. Koshiba M. Molecular targeted therapy and laboratory tests. Rinsho Byori. 2016;64:709–716. - PubMed
    1. Beane J, Campbell JD, Lel J, Vick J, Spira A. Genomic approaches to accelerate cancer interception. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:e494–e502. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weber BL. Cancer genomics. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:37–47. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

-