In the Opinion of Elite Volleyball Coaches, How Do Contextual Variables Influence Individual Volleyball Performance in Competitions?
- PMID: 36287769
- PMCID: PMC9607642
- DOI: 10.3390/sports10100156
In the Opinion of Elite Volleyball Coaches, How Do Contextual Variables Influence Individual Volleyball Performance in Competitions?
Abstract
The main objective was to know the elite coaches’ opinions regarding the relevance, definition, and importance of volleyball contextual variables to measure individual performance in competition. After performing a literature review, an instrument to gather the opinion of the world’s elite volleyball coaches was elaborated by four volleyball specialists. The sample of experts consisted in 20 world’s elite volleyball coaches who met at least three experience years in first division or national teams. The instrument collected experts’ information on the contextual variables in relation to relevance, definition, and importance. Cronbach’s α and Aiken’s V coefficient were used to test the reliability and content validity of the contextual variables, respectively. To compare the importance of the contextual variables U de Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used. Results showed that opposition level, set period, score difference, results of the previous set, competitive load variables, high level, final periods ≥20, and high load categories were relevant (Aikens V > 0.70). In addition, high level, final period ≥20 and ≥+10, and high load categories were significantly more important (p < 0.05). We conclude that, according to the elite coaches, the contextual variables should not be analyzed separately. Future studies should consider contextual variables dynamically.
Keywords: coaching; competitive environment; performance analysis; practical perspective; sport.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Contextualizing Evaluation of Performance in Volleyball: Introducing Contextual Individual Contribution Coefficients to Assess Technical Actions.Percept Mot Skills. 2023 Dec;130(6):2663-2684. doi: 10.1177/00315125231212592. Epub 2023 Nov 6. Percept Mot Skills. 2023. PMID: 37927053
-
Exploring leadership behaviors of the coaches of champion teams.Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1091703. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1091703. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36687939 Free PMC article.
-
How players exploit variability and regularity of game actions in female volleyball teams.Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 May;17(4):473-481. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1271459. Epub 2017 Jan 9. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017. PMID: 28068210
-
Correspondence between training load executed by volleyball players and the one observed by coaches.J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jun;28(6):1588-94. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000324. J Strength Cond Res. 2014. PMID: 24276301
-
Attack and serve performances according to the match period and quality of opposition in elite volleyball matches.J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Dec;26(12):3385-91. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182474269. J Strength Cond Res. 2012. PMID: 22207260
References
-
- Wangrow D.B., Schepker D.J., Barker V.L. Power, performance, and expectations in the dismissal of NBA coaches: A survival analysis study. Sport Manag. Rev. 2018;21:333–346. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2017.08.002. - DOI
-
- James B., Henzler J. Win Shares. STATS Pub; Chicago, IL, USA: 2002.
-
- Wright C., Atkins S., Jones B., Todd J. The role of performance analysts within the coaching process: Performance Analysts Survey “The role of performance analysts in elite football club settings”. Int. J. Perform. Anal. Sport. 2013;13:240–261. doi: 10.1080/24748668.2013.11868645. - DOI
-
- Drikos S., Barzouka K., Balasas D.G., Sotiropoulos K. Effect of quality of opposition on game performance indicators in elite male volleyball. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 2021;3:174795412110137. doi: 10.1177/17479541211013701. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous