Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds
- PMID: 36339988
- PMCID: PMC9626940
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11136
Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds
Abstract
Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) technology allows to choose a large variety of materials and it is widely used by companies and individuals nowadays. The cost effectiveness of rapid prototyping is achievable via FDM, that makes this technology useful for research and innovation. The application of 3D printing to aid production is the most common approach. Moreover, the use of 3D printing in prototypes result in a waste of material since no reuse is considered. In the following manuscript, this technology is applied to mould fabrication by achieving a low surface roughness at a modest cost compared to conventional manufacturing methods. Moreover, the possibility to use a combination of thermoplastic materials is analysed by examination of the CAD model optimized for Additive Manufacturing (AM) from scratch and was verified using metrology tools. Several moulds were finally built and applied to the specific case study of carbon fibre laminated components. This manuscript aims to analyse the manufacturing process by comparing the mould surface geometry before and after the smoothing process. The achieved tolerance between the produced moulds is ±0.05 mm that ensures the repeatability of the process from an industrial point of view; whilst the deviation between CAD and mould is ±0.2 mm. To combine an accurate FDM process together with chemical smoothing proved to be a powerful strategy to produce high quality components that can be inserted in the production process by means of traditional manufacturing techniques. This will aid to reduce the cost of standard manufacturing for low production batches and prototypes of carbon fibre composites.
Keywords: Carbon fibre mould; Chemical smoothing; FDM; Multimaterial FDM; PLA; PVB; Vapor smoothing.
© 2022 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr1.gif)
![Figure 2](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr2.gif)
![Figure 3](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr3.gif)
![Figure 4](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr4.gif)
![Figure 5](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr5.gif)
![Figure 6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr6.gif)
![Figure 7](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr7.gif)
![Figure 8](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr8.gif)
![Figure 9](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr9.gif)
![Figure 10](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr10.gif)
![Figure 11](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr11.gif)
![Figure 12](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr12.gif)
![Figure 13](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr13.gif)
![Figure 14](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr14.gif)
![Figure 15](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr15.gif)
![Figure 16](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr16.gif)
![Figure 17](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr17.gif)
![Figure 18](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr18.gif)
![Figure 19](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr19.gif)
![Figure 20](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr20.gif)
![Figure 21](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr21.gif)
![Figure 22](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr22.gif)
![Figure 23](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr23.gif)
![Figure 24](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr24.gif)
![Figure 25](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9626940/bin/gr25.gif)
Similar articles
-
Molds with Advanced Materials for Carbon Fiber Manufacturing with 3D Printing Technology.Polymers (Basel). 2021 Oct 27;13(21):3700. doi: 10.3390/polym13213700. Polymers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34771265 Free PMC article.
-
Investigation of a Short Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Polyamide and Comparison of Two Manufacturing Processes: Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) and Polymer Injection Moulding (PIM).Materials (Basel). 2020 Feb 3;13(3):672. doi: 10.3390/ma13030672. Materials (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32028619 Free PMC article.
-
X-ray computed tomography evaluations of additive manufactured multimaterial composites.J Microsc. 2022 Mar;285(3):131-143. doi: 10.1111/jmi.13034. Epub 2021 Jun 4. J Microsc. 2022. PMID: 34057229
-
FDM-based additive manufacturing of recycled thermoplastics and associated composites.J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. 2023;25(2):758-784. doi: 10.1007/s10163-022-01588-2. Epub 2023 Jan 11. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. 2023. PMID: 36686404 Free PMC article. Review.
-
FDM-Based 3D Printing of Polymer and Associated Composite: A Review on Mechanical Properties, Defects and Treatments.Polymers (Basel). 2020 Jul 10;12(7):1529. doi: 10.3390/polym12071529. Polymers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32664374 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Design of an innovative sanitation system for bike-sharing service.Heliyon. 2024 Feb 20;10(4):e26595. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26595. eCollection 2024 Feb 29. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38420367 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Shahrubudin N., Lee T.C., Ramlan R. An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials, and applications. Procedia Manuf. 2019;35:1286–1296.
-
- Guessasma S., Belhabib S., Nouri H. Effect of printing temperature on microstructure, thermal behavior and tensile properties of 3D printed nylon using fused deposition modeling. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021;138(14):50162.
-
- Ning F., Cong W., Hu Z., Huang K. Additive manufacturing of thermoplastic matrix composites using fused deposition modeling: a comparison of two reinforcements. J. Compos. Mater. 2017;51(27):3733–3742.
-
- Wang P., et al. Preparation of short CF/GF reinforced PEEK composite filaments and their comprehensive properties evaluation for FDM-3D printing. Compos. B Eng. 2020;198
-
- Sodeifian G., Ghaseminejad S., Yousefi A.A. Preparation of polypropylene/short glass fiber composite as Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) filament. Results Phys. 2019;12:205–222.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous