Medical Experts' Agreement on Risk Assessment Based on All Possible Combinations of the COVID-19 Predictors-A Novel Approach for Public Health Screening and Surveillance
- PMID: 36554487
- PMCID: PMC9779080
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416601
Medical Experts' Agreement on Risk Assessment Based on All Possible Combinations of the COVID-19 Predictors-A Novel Approach for Public Health Screening and Surveillance
Abstract
During the initial phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there was a critical need to create a valid and reliable screening and surveillance for university staff and students. Consequently, 11 medical experts participated in this cross-sectional study to judge three risk categories of either low, medium, or high, for all 1536 possible combinations of 11 key COVID-19 predictors. The independent experts' judgement on each combination was recorded via a novel dashboard-based rating method which presented combinations of these predictors in a dynamic display within Microsoft Excel. The validated instrument also incorporated an innovative algorithm-derived deduction for efficient rating tasks. The results of the study revealed an ordinal-weighted agreement coefficient of 0.81 (0.79 to 0.82, p-value < 0.001) that reached a substantial class of inferential benchmarking. Meanwhile, on average, the novel algorithm eliminated 76.0% of rating tasks by deducing risk categories based on experts' ratings for prior combinations. As a result, this study reported a valid, complete, practical, and efficient method for COVID-19 health screening via a reliable combinatorial-based experts' judgement. The new method to risk assessment may also prove applicable for wider fields of practice whenever a high-stakes decision-making relies on experts' agreement on combinations of important criteria.
Keywords: agreement; combinations; dashboard-based rating; novel method; public health screening; public health surveillance; risk assessment.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9779080/bin/ijerph-19-16601-g001.gif)
![Figure 2](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9779080/bin/ijerph-19-16601-g002.gif)
![Figure 3](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9779080/bin/ijerph-19-16601-g003.gif)
![Figure 4](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9779080/bin/ijerph-19-16601-g004.gif)
![Figure 5](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9779080/bin/ijerph-19-16601-g005.gif)
![Figure 6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9779080/bin/ijerph-19-16601-g006.gif)
![Figure 7](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9779080/bin/ijerph-19-16601-g007.gif)
Similar articles
-
Expert assessment of exposure to carcinogens in Norway's offshore petroleum industry.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008 Mar;18(2):175-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500578. Epub 2007 Apr 25. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008. PMID: 17457323
-
Methods of assessing categorical agreement between correlated screening tests in clinical studies.J Appl Stat. 2021;48(10):1861-1881. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1777394. Epub 2020 Jun 9. J Appl Stat. 2021. PMID: 34305250 Free PMC article.
-
Using the Data Agreement Criterion to Rank Experts' Beliefs.Entropy (Basel). 2018 Aug 9;20(8):592. doi: 10.3390/e20080592. Entropy (Basel). 2018. PMID: 33265681 Free PMC article.
-
Dental care during COVID-19 pandemic: Follow-up survey of experts' opinion.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Oct;32 Suppl 21(Suppl 21):342-352. doi: 10.1111/clr.13783. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021. PMID: 34196051 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Updated diagnosis, treatment and prevention of COVID-19 in children: experts' consensus statement (condensed version of the second edition).World J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;16(3):232-239. doi: 10.1007/s12519-020-00362-4. Epub 2020 Apr 24. World J Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 32333248 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Patel S. Calculated decisions: CURB-65 score for pneumonia severity. Emerg. Med. 2021;23((Suppl. 2)):CD1–CD2. - PubMed
-
- Ismail A., Ibrahim M.S., Ismail S., Aziz A.A., Yusoff H.M., Mokhtar M., Juahir H. Development of COVID-19 Health-Risk Assessment and Self-Evaluation (CHaSe): A health screening system for university students and staff during the movement control order (MCO) Netw. Model. Anal. Health Inform. Bioinform. 2022;11:21. doi: 10.1007/s13721-022-00357-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ibrahim M.S., Hassan N.M., Aziz A.A., Yusoff H.M., Esa N.K., Makhtar M., Rahman N.I.A., Ismail S., Ramli R.A., Naing N.N., et al. Clinical manifestations of COVID-19; what have we learned from the global database? Bangladesh J. Med. Sci. 2022;21:702–709. doi: 10.3329/bjms.v21i3.59588. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials