Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;11(10):6074-6080.
doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_151_22. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

Assessment of clinical and virological outcomes of rural and urban populations: COVID-19

Affiliations

Assessment of clinical and virological outcomes of rural and urban populations: COVID-19

Usha Bhocal et al. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the clinical and virological status in urban and rural populations.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak for a period of six months. Upper respiratory tract (URT) specimens including nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected from the patients and their contacts and processed by RT-PCR technique for COVID-19 detection. Further, clinical and virological response in both the population were assessed and compared.

Results: A total of 37,724 URT samples were tested, out of which 20,144 (53%) samples were from the rural population and 17,580 (47%) from the urban population. Out of the total samples from urban and rural population, COVID-19 positivity was 13.9% in urban population and 6.2% in rural population. Around 86% patients or contacts were asymptomatic in both the rural and urban population and rests were symptomatic 14%. Among the symptomatic patients, sore throat was seen as the most common presenting symptom (95-100%) followed by fever (80-83%), dry cough (55-61%), nasal discharge (18-23%), and breathlessness (3-5%) in both the rural and urban population.

Conclusion: Our outcomes provide novel facts that the COVID-19 epidemic severely affected both rural and urban populations but with few differences. In our study, positivity rate in case of urban population was 13.9% as compared to 6.2% in rural population. There are two foremost facets that contributed variation in positivity in both the population. First, better immune response in rural population as compared to urban population which can be due to the fact that rural people in India are more exposed to various pathogens during their early lifetime thus, improving their immune status. Second, factor could be elevated population densities in urban areas which can contribute to increased infectiousness thus higher positivity rate. In addition, people living in urban population have to commute more for their work and are exposed to more people throughout the day thus, having more possibility to get infection of COVID-19 as compared to the rural population. To the best of our knowledge, there are no studies conducted on COVID-19, among rural population of Haryana. Hence, this study will allow us to fill the gap in knowledge about the variation in contagion spread and immune response in both rural and urban populations.

Keywords: COVID-19; Clinical; RT-PCR; virological seroprevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study cohort flowchart. Children to adult patients from rural and urban province were taken with COVID-19 during the study period from June 1 to November 30
Figure 2
Figure 2
Common symptoms of symptomatic case
Figure 3
Figure 3
2-D pie chart shows six months symptomatic-asymptomatic cases in rural-urban area
Figure 4
Figure 4
2-D pie chart showing percentages of COVID symptomatic and asymptomatic male/female cases in rural-urban provinces
Figure 5
Figure 5
Bar graph showing percent positivity of rural/urban province
Figure 6
Figure 6
Scatter plot shows month wise data distribution of covid symptomatic and asymptomatic male/female cases in rural-urban provinces
Figure 7
Figure 7
Scatter plot showing age wise percentage of covid symptomatic and asymptomatic male/female cases in rural-urban province
Figure 8
Figure 8
Mean CT value of urban/rural symptomatic and asymptomatic patients

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronanavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun. 2020;109:102433. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abuelgasim E, Saw L, Shirke M, Zeinah M, Harky A. COVID-19:Unique public health issues facing Black, Asian and minority ethnic communities. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2020;45:100621. doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100621. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2020. COVID-19 India Update. [Last accessed on 2020 Mar 31]. Availablefrom: https://www.mohfw.gov.in/
    1. Covid19.who.int, 2020. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. [Last accessed on 2020 Oct 27]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/
-