Novel Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Robustness and Stability in Probiotic Bifidobacteria
- PMID: 36802222
- PMCID: PMC10057886
- DOI: 10.1128/aem.00082-23
Novel Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Robustness and Stability in Probiotic Bifidobacteria
Abstract
Some probiotic bifidobacteria are highly robust and shelf-stable, whereas others are difficult to produce, due to their sensitivity to stressors. This limits their potential use as probiotics. Here, we investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the variability in stress physiologies of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum BB-46, by applying a combination of classical physiological characterization and transcriptome profiling. The growth behavior, metabolite production, and global gene expression profiles differed considerably between the strains. BB-12 consistently showed higher expression levels of multiple stress-associated genes, compared to BB-46. This difference, besides higher cell surface hydrophobicity and a lower ratio of unsaturated to saturated fatty acids in the cell membrane of BB-12, should contribute to its higher robustness and stability. In BB-46, the expression of genes related to DNA repair and fatty acid biosynthesis was higher in the stationary than in the exponential phase, which was associated with enhanced stability of BB-46 cells harvested in the stationary phase. The results presented herein highlight important genomic and physiological features contributing to the stability and robustness of the studied Bifidobacterium strains. IMPORTANCE Probiotics are industrially and clinically important microorganisms. To exert their health-promoting effects, probiotic microorganisms must be administered at high counts, while maintaining their viability at the time of consumption. In addition, intestinal survival and bioactivity are important criteria for probiotics. Although bifidobacteria are among the most well-documented probiotics, the industrial-scale production and commercialization of some Bifidobacterium strains is challenged by their high sensitivity to environmental stressors encountered during manufacturing and storage. Through a comprehensive comparison of the metabolic and physiological characteristics of 2 Bifidobacterium strains, we identify key biological markers that can serve as indicators for robustness and stability in bifidobacteria.
Keywords: Bifidobacteria longum subsp. longum; Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis; amino acids utilization and synthesis; cell membrane fatty acid profile; cell surface hydrophobicity; metabolite production; probiotic bacteria; robustness; stability; transcriptomic.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare a potential conflict of interest. M.S., K.J., A.G., R.A.F., and A.A.Z. were employed by Chr. Hansen A/S, a global supplier of probiotics, at the time of writing this manuscript. The authors' views presented in this manuscript, however, are solely based on scientific grounds and do not reflect the commercial interests of their employer.
Figures
![FIG 1](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10057886/bin/aem.00082-23-f001.gif)
![FIG 2](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10057886/bin/aem.00082-23-f002.gif)
![FIG 3](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10057886/bin/aem.00082-23-f003.gif)
![FIG 4](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10057886/bin/aem.00082-23-f004.gif)
![FIG 5](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10057886/bin/aem.00082-23-f005.gif)
![FIG 6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10057886/bin/aem.00082-23-f006.gif)
![FIG 7](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10057886/bin/aem.00082-23-f007.gif)
![formula image](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10057886/bin/aem.00082-23-f07a.jpg)
![formula image](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10057886/bin/aem.00082-23-f07b.jpg)
Similar articles
-
Identifying the essential nutritional requirements of the probiotic bacteria Bifidobacterium animalis and Bifidobacterium longum through genome-scale modeling.NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2021 Dec 9;7(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41540-021-00207-4. NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2021. PMID: 34887435 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and intestinal microbiota modulation by the exopolysaccharide-producing strains Bifidobacterium animalis IPLA R1 and Bifidobacterium longum IPLA E44 orally administered to Wistar rats.Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Jan 5;144(3):342-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.10.016. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011. PMID: 21078530
-
Use of tuf gene-based primers for the PCR detection of probiotic Bifidobacterium species and enumeration of bifidobacteria in fermented milk by cultural and quantitative real-time PCR methods.J Food Sci. 2010 Oct;75(8):M521-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01816.x. J Food Sci. 2010. PMID: 21535508
-
Stress Response in Bifidobacteria.Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2022 Dec 21;86(4):e0017021. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00170-21. Epub 2022 Nov 14. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2022. PMID: 36374074 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: Propionibacterium and Bifidobacterium.Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Sep 1;126(3):316-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.08.019. Epub 2007 Aug 22. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008. PMID: 17889391 Review.
References
-
- Joint FAO/WHO Working Group on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in. 2002. Guidelines for the evalualtion of probiotics in food, p. 8. London Ontario, Canada.
-
- Tripathi MK, Giri SK. 2014. Probiotic functional foods: survival of probiotics during processing and storage. J Funct Foods 9:225–241. 10.1016/j.jff.2014.04.030. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources